On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> wrote: > On 12/08/2009 10:08 AM, sankarshan wrote: >> >> 2009/12/8 Pierre-Luc Beaudoin<pierre-...@pierlux.com>: >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 03:23 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >>>> >>>> But I find it interesting to know, say, what Miguel is up to these >>>> days. I don't think it's just me... >>> >>> I don't believe Frederic was pointing at Miguel. There are people who >>> have left the Gnome community working on products that don't use any >>> Gnome technology posting blog post/ads for said product on PGO. >> >> [0] Unless specific names are pointed out to the Board or, on this >> list, the shadow boxing will be more harmful >> >> [1] How does one define that they have "left the GNOME community" ? > > Exactly. The more I think about the issues raised in this thread, the more > I believe a voting system (similar to what maemo is doing perhaps) may be > all we need. > > Say, any viewer of p.g.o can vote a post +1 or -1. Then we can gather two > metrics per poster: 1) how impactful his/her posts are (avg / median / max > number of votes). 2) how interested are readers in his/her posts (avg / > median / min/max score. > > We can then have threshold to hide / collapse unpopular posts. That part > can even be done using JavaScript and you can the threshold on the page and > more posts will collapse/uncollapse... >
Really ? Most people read posts in Google reader (offline) and may not even be interested to vote for every author. -- Sankar P http://psankar.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list