Hi,
On 30 May 2018 at 11:52, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:23 PM Didier Roche wrote:
>> The only
>> requirements are that the person is attending GUADEC to receive the
>> pants, and that it's not a current or outgoing board member.
>
> I really wanted to nominate Carlos Sor
Hi all,
Sep 29 was my last day at Pelagicore and today is my first day at
Kinvolk gmbH. I will update wikipages.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Hi Max,
On 26 May 2017 at 18:13, Max wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> First, thanks to all candidates for volunteering to the Foundation Board.
> Max come from GNOME.Asia team and thanks GNOME and board support Asia.
>
>
> I know there will be more people ask questions about all domain with
> GNOME, so I
didn't happen so since I had not received any reply for two
weeks, I got very frustrated.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
what I was getting frustrated about but rather the complete
lack of communication from the committee for weeks in a row despite
weekly reminders and having no idea about when I'll be reimbursed.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: h
lot of time on getting the committee members to do their jobs,
I think we have a problem and we need to talk about it.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
foundati
king for one-way streaming to a lot of people,
> not for a meeting. But I could have misunderstood that.
It's a hackfest, so while the primary objective is one-way
communication, it would be very much desirable IMO for remote
participants to be able to talk with us.
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
>> Yeah I understand that but I'm wondering if they could be persuaded
>> not to treat all applying projects equally and give more room and time
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:45:59PM +, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> While I greatly appreciate your (and of everyone involved) voluntary
>> work on organising the devr
st desktops-devr...@lists.fosdem.org.
>>
>> Use this page to manage your subscription:
>>
>> https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/desktops-devroom
>>
>>
>> Organization
>>
>> The Desktops DevRoom 2016 is managed by a team representing the mos
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hey,
>
>> I don't even remember/know whats my username.
>
> Did you try your GNOME email alias?
Thanks. yeah that is it. I
s explained at point 5. under "Requesting" [4]. If that
> won't work please get in touch with the Accounts Team [5] instead.
I don't even remember/know whats my username.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: http://w
C vs. C++. The most important fact to keep in
mind here is that decision to go for Qt was not made by Maemo side of
Nokia. Keeping that in mind, I don't see any exaggeration in
Emmanuele's statement above.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befrie
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Sindhu S wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
>
>> Oh your visa was rejected? Really sorry to hear, having been there
>> myself. Did they give any reasons?
>
> Why are you being sarcastic? You are v
Hi Sindhu,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Sindhu S wrote:
> So what's the final consensus on the reimbursement of rejected visas?
Oh your visa was rejected? Really sorry to hear, having been there
myself. Did they give any reasons?
Zeeshan Ali
ork?
While I think you do a lot for Free Software and your passion and work
inspires many, I'm afraid I do share Oliver's concern here.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
_
thought that
I'm wrong here, I decided to rest my case.
Since you asked, I will reply in private to address your valid points about OPW.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:41 AM, meg ford wrote:
> Hi Zeeshan,
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
>>
>> Since visa process is not in the hands of the board, I think any help
>> that board offers is a big favour so IMO what i
ers is a big favour so IMO what is unfair here is for
you to complain for not getting a favour while another person did. I'm
a bit sad to hear this from an ex-OPW participant as OPW is itself an
unfair[1] advantage and you were one of the people to get that. If it
makes you feel better, Dieg
ating the communications between teams, contributors,
> adboard members, ISVs that wish to target GNOME, as well as OSVs that
> wish to use GNOME as their platform of choice for their products.
>
> ciao,
> Emmanuele.
--
Regards,
a brief summary of your work/contributions as
board member in the past year? It would greatly help the members in
deciding to vote for you.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http
n old flamebait, but if no one here who is still active
> ("influential") in GNOME is openly pro-GNU, then it's time to openly
> admit that.
How did you derive "I am not pro-GNU" from "I dont want to join the
GNU mailing-list"? If you ever need an example
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Le dim. 28 févr. 2010 à 19:20:39 (+0200), Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit:
>> Thanks for your clarification. Thing is that Philip had been using
>> the word 'we' quite a lot in the recent endless discussions
who is going to pay for this effort? :(
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
ftware and GNOME[1].
I didn't complain so far because it wasn't always 100% clear if he
means 'all GNOME developers' by 'we' until now where he made it
perfectly clear.
Now that that is sorted out, I would like the foundation to forbid
him from doing so in future. O
of the bar we do this. So
just one suggestion: Could we please do it some other place next year?
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
but
attracted users from all over the world.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
[1] http://irc-galleria.net/
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
e you in some way special?
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
rings
> attached, I don't care particularly why they give it.
>
> On the other hand, I feel under no obligation to promote their non-free
> software offerings, or guilt in encouraging free equivalents of their
> proprietary components & products.
I fee like you took thou
tive.
Just curious, shouldn't you be thinking the same way when posting
pictures of flying spaghetti monster on your blog?
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.
aid
operations such as status, diff and commit. In contrast a Git working
directory requires only one small index file that stores about 100
bytes of data per tracked file. On projects with a large number of
files this can be a substantial difference in the disk space required
per w
ing that we'll be
able to gather at least 10 volunteers and together we can do it, even
using our spare time.
In any case, after looking at the results of the survey we should
only look at hybrid/dual proposal like John's when we don't find any
way of moving to git in a reason
for such a big task. I hope I am wrong about
this and we do have enough resources to do the move but in case I am
right, I think we should seriously consider John's idea.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
w of
practical benefits of working with/for community in these conferences.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali Khattak
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
e case since I've been on Tenerife
and it wasn't possible in there.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali Khattak
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
ey for the beer, which as Quim pointed
out will not be expensive.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali Khattak
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
true about Spain.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali Khattak
FSF member#5124
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
37 matches
Mail list logo
