- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Triplett"
> To: "Marina Zhurakhinskaya"
> Cc: "foundation-list"
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:06:49 PM
> Subject: Re: code of conduct question for Board candidates
>
> On Sat, May 23, 20
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Nobody is asking anyone to sign anything. A CoC would simply be a
> > stated policy for expected behavior on community resources, such as
> > mailing lists, IRC, Bugzilla,
Hi!
On Sa, 2015-05-23 at 11:41 -0400, Marina Zhurakhinskaya wrote:
> What do you think about adopting a detailed code of conduct, similar
> to the one used for GUADEC 2014 [3], for all GNOME events and creating
> a similarly detailed code of conduct for the GNOME community?
It's a complicated subj
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Nobody is asking anyone to sign anything. A CoC would simply be a
> stated policy for expected behavior on community resources, such as
> mailing lists, IRC, Bugzilla, wikis, email, etc.
Except the board did ask the GUADEC 2014 attendees to
Hi Marina!
Marina Zhurakhinskaya wrote:
...
> Thanks to all the candidates for stepping up to run for the board and for all
> the work you already do for the Foundation!
>
> Many free software organizations have adopted codes of conduct for their
> events [1] and some for their communities [2].
>
> People can do as they like on their own systems and resources, but when
> participating in the GNOME community, they should do so with respect.
> Refusing to exclude anyone is itself an exclusionary policy; it selects
> for the kind of people who will put up with absolutely anything, and
> excl
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:34:14AM +0100, Magdalen Berns wrote:
> OK in light of these responses, I feel I should maybe better clarify that
> whilst I agree this sort of stance may be a fair way to moderated
> communications with non-members, I do not agree with expelling card
> carrying members fr
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Josh Triplett
wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 07:11:42PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > I'm entirely in favor of an improved code of conduct, both for events
> > > and in general. And thank you
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 07:11:42PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I'm entirely in favor of an improved code of conduct, both for events
> > and in general. And thank you for raising this issue.
> >
> > Some searching turned up https
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 05:15:29PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> I suggest
2015-05-23 17:41 GMT+02:00 Marina Zhurakhinskaya :
> What do you think about adopting a detailed code of conduct, similar to the
> one used for GUADEC 2014 [3], for all GNOME events and creating a similarly
> detailed code of conduct for the GNOME community?
Having a final version of the Code o
Hi Marina,
I think we all agree we want a welcome community, and that means searching for
the commune divisor and not allowing anything outside that.
As far as I saw, all the previous answer from the candidates share the same
opinion.
I would actually like to have a code of conduct for every pa
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marina Zhurakhinskaya
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Many free software organizations have adopted codes of conduct for their
> events [1] and some for their communities [2]. Detailed codes of conduct with
> specific enforcement guidelines signal to newcomers that the comm
Hi Marina,
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Marina Zhurakhinskaya
wrote:
> What do you think about adopting a detailed code of conduct, similar to
> the one used for GUADEC 2014 [3], for all GNOME events and creating a
> similarly detailed code of conduct for the GNOME community?
>
I welcomed t
Hi Richard,
I agree, it is probably appropriate for those of us who have answered to
hold off on debating about CoCs for the time being. Apologies for the
noise. I'm happy to back off so other candidates can answer Marina's
question. Do carry on... :D
Magdalen
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:15 PM, R
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I suggest that
we postpone discussion on codes of conduct until after the election.
I
Hi Olav,
I don't follow why I'd sign something can cause legal issues for me if I
> could do without that.
>
I am not sure why you are concerned that a community code of conduct could
cause legal issues for you, are you able to elaborate on that?
> I think in the question the GNOME community vs
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I'm entirely in favor of an improved code of conduct, both for events
> and in general. And thank you for raising this issue.
>
> Some searching turned up https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct
> , but that's definitely ins
Hi Marina,
Thanks for your question!
What do you think about adopting a detailed code of conduct, similar to the
> one used for GUADEC 2014 [3], for all GNOME events and creating a similarly
> detailed code of conduct for the GNOME community?
>
I hold the view that the vast majority people will
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:41:06AM -0400, Marina Zhurakhinskaya wrote:
> Thanks to all the candidates for stepping up to run for the board and
> for all the work you already do for the Foundation!
>
> Many free software organizations have adopted codes of conduct for
> their events [1] and some fo
Hi,
Thanks to all the candidates for stepping up to run for the board and for all
the work you already do for the Foundation!
Many free software organizations have adopted codes of conduct for their events
[1] and some for their communities [2]. Detailed codes of conduct with specific
enforcem
21 matches
Mail list logo