El dj 01 de 06 del 2006 a les 10:51 -0500, en/na Shaun McCance va
escriure:
there tends to
be a reasonably high percentage of women in technical jobs
that aren't necessarily programming (though they may involve
some programming), such as project management, tech writing,
graphic design, and
I think it is a natural step to take after the EU and FLOSSPOLS report
has shown that women are being excluded from the community.-
This rubs me the wrong way. It's not like we're actively working to
exclude women, Asians, or Martians from GNOME. Nor are we actively
trying to make GNOME a
On 6/1/06, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne wrote:
[snip]
I do not say this to start a new long debat in this tread. But it has
become obvious that the 1% participation of women in FLOSS is
embarrassing and we need to have a look at why this is the case and make
some cultural
Hi,
Luis Villa wrote:
Such a plan should be written by someone who has actually been
involved in IRC, our mailing lists, bugzilla, etc., *as a developer*-
which, sorry, isn't Anne. It will not work if it is not driven by
someone with such experience.
That's not so. There's nothing
Actually, it should be someone who is able to detect possible obstacles
that put Asians or Women out of GNOME (or in general Free Software). I
doubt that anyone have any emprical study about that. But is it harsh
and rude behavior of developers or the community? Or technical limits?
Or even
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 16:27 +0300, skrev Baris Cicek:
Actually, it should be someone who is able to detect possible obstacles
that put Asians or Women out of GNOME (or in general Free Software). I
doubt that anyone have any emprical study about that. But is it harsh
and rude behavior of
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 08:13 -0400, skrev Luis Villa:
On 6/1/06, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne wrote:
[snip]
I do not say this to start a new long debat in this tread. But it has
become obvious that the 1% participation of women in FLOSS is
embarrassing and we need to
On Iau, 2006-06-01 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Hmm, how about people working together? It just seems that the person who
most most obviously wants this should be the person trying to make it
happen.
I'd be wary of pursuing just the women in GNOME issue, because many of
the same
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 18:57 +0200, skrev Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:57 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2006-06-01 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Hmm, how about people working together? It just seems that the person who
most most obviously wants this should be the person
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 22:21 +0200, Anne Østergaard wrote:
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 18:57 +0200, skrev Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:57 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
Also if Code of Conduct is too strong then Expected Behaviour
perhaps. Personally I don't see a problem with Code of
Hi,
Anne Østergaard wrote:
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 18:57 +0200, skrev Murray Cumming:
I think it is a natural step to take after the EU and FLOSSPOLS report
has shown that women are being excluded from the community.-
What I've seen shows that women are not participating in the community -
this
I think it is a natural step to take after the EU and FLOSSPOLS report
has shown that women are being excluded from the community.-
This rubs me the wrong way. It's not like we're actively working to
exclude women, Asians, or Martians from GNOME. Nor are we actively
trying to make GNOME a
12 matches
Mail list logo
