On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 22:42 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> . Do you see any value in
> keeping those URLs around even if they're historical and not relevant
> since several years?
There's intertwined questions here...
* the old URLs should continue to resolve to useful resources, even if
they are
Liam,
thanks for your comments, an additional note: this is actually NOT the
old page as in theory whenever we'll have a new way of handling
projects views the former (and to be considered old) website is going
to be [1]. In 2013 we migrated several of those links to what
projects.gnome.org is
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 12:31 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Liam,
>
> no, I really meant projects-old.gnome.org which as I described on my
> original e-mail was the pre-2013 projects page we had running before
> transitioning to the new wiki.g.o based projects listing.
Yes, i understood that. Sorry
Liam,
no, I really meant projects-old.gnome.org which as I described on my
original e-mail was the pre-2013 projects page we had running before
transitioning to the new wiki.g.o based projects listing. I believe
the future of projects.g.o will vary, certain maintainers are setting
up GitLab pages
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 11:22 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Hey,
>
> the projects-old website [1] was decided to be left around in 2013
> right after transitioning projects pages to the GNOME's wiki
> (projects.g.o is a vhost that contains a set of redirects since then)
i think you mean
Hey,
the projects-old website [1] was decided to be left around in 2013
right after transitioning projects pages to the GNOME's wiki
(projects.g.o is a vhost that contains a set of redirects since then)
for a short period of time while the transition was happening. I
believe it's now a good time
