On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Mike Allen wrote:
Off-hand, I think you want to go with link-agg active as opposed to
passive. Not sure about the trunk commands, normally that would be for
setting up static trunks, but I don't remember the exact process in
older versions of switch and code (which I
On 23/09/2011 06:21, panicloop wrote:
This switch model is Foundry FirstIron Edge 12GCF.
And according to the customer, they are trying to change passive to active
or adding another parameter such as key XXX or type server,
but it seems that nothing help this problem.
panicloop,
If you're
Same experience here. Linux does support round-robin distribution of
frames, but most switch vendors do not. We tried cisco/hp/smc/3com.
It kinda makes sense, as the RR method can produce out-of-order frame
arrival, and the reassembly will use more CPU on the receiver side.
Guess it depends
On 23/09/2011 09:19, Jethro R Binks wrote:
I'm a bit hazy on details now, but given the scenario of a single client
trying to multiplex essentially one traffic stream to a single server over
aggregated links, would that have been doable with a Foundry device?
Something about mode 0 at the
