Re: [f-nsp] Where have all the MLX/XMR users gone to?

Nope, just very little chatter. BR. > Le 28 janv. 2019 à 20:32, joe mcguckin a écrit : > > Is there a new list for Foundry/Brocade/Extreme? > > Thanks, > > joe > > > Joe McGuckin > ViaNet Communications > > j...@via.net > 650-207-0372 cell > 650-213-1302 office > 650-969-2124 fax > >

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe code recommendations

nd we > are actively looking into an upgrade to the 6.3 tree for the BGP Large Comm > patches. > > Jörg > >> On 13 Sep 2018, at 7:22, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Current target path is 6.0 something. >> >> Definitely wort

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe code recommendations

Hi, Current target path is 6.0 something. Definitely worth looking at. BR. > Le 13 sept. 2018 à 00:20, Eldon Koyle a > écrit : > > Does anyone have a recommendation for a code version for MLXe? > > The last I saw recommended here was recent 5.8, I'm wondering if it is worth >

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron OS 06.3.00 / RFC8092

Hi Jörg, Finally, I’ve been pushing for this in my previous job. Never too late I guess. Thanks for the feedback. Best regards. > Le 1 sept. 2018 à 11:50, Jörg Kost a écrit : > > Hi friends, > > 6.3 has been released yesterday. It includes support for RFC8092 BGP Large > Communities. >

Re: [f-nsp] BR-MLX-MR2-X / BR-MLX-100GX2 modules not recognized,

Hi, Stab in the dark : - In what hardware / OS version are you running ? - Did you check hardware compatibility matrix ? Best regards. > Le 14 août 2018 à 19:05, Joseph Clark a écrit : > > We have some BR-MLX-MR2-X and BR-MLX-100GX2-CFP2 modules that are having > issues. The

Re: [f-nsp] FCX and target path 8.0.10m (and an aside)

Personally, I never moved away from 7.4. Best regards. > Le 22 févr. 2018 à 11:16, Jethro R Binks a écrit : > > The silence was deafening! > > So bit of a development with this. We had three stack failure events > which required a hard reboot to sort. We made

Re: [f-nsp] SLX season's greetings

Hello Jörg, Thank you for this feedback. I was interested in following this webinar, I registered but was unable to connect. Do you have a link to download a slide-deck or a video ? Thank you. 2017-11-14 9:41 GMT+01:00 Jörg Kost : > Hi, > > I don't know, how many of you

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

gt; reload the device to apply the new settings. > > Best regards, > Martijn > >> On 06-09-17 21:53, Brian Rak wrote: >> What sort of resource limits are you running into here? Did you find any >> sort of workaround, or are you just reloading all the time? >>

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Been there, suffer from it everyday. They might not have CAM profiles ala MLXe, but they still have CAMs... so they have limited and counted ressources. Best regards. > Le 6 sept. 2017 à 21:37, Brian Rak a écrit : > > CER's don't have CAM profiles. From the

Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning

Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <benge...@gmail.com>: > Hi Clement, > > That is so very true. Still, that doesn't always work. > > I also like the idea of threatening your favorite vendor to throw > away their gear on the curve, even if we all know that it won't help. >

Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning

management to buy you some brand > new toys :-) > > Clément > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:01 +0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > > Hi Clement :-) > > > > Sur, I thought of that. But knowing sales guys in my company, someone at > > some point will have the br

Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning

Clement Cavadore <clem...@cavadore.net>: > I'd rather change my management method and switch to ipv4-ipv6-2 :-) > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 01:02 +0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > > Dear Daniel, > > > > Is this really the only option ? > > > > Eit

Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning

an additional default, and do an > ASN filter list with a little help from this: > https://github.com/ipcjk/asnbuilder > >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr >> <benge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No one ? Really ?!? >> >> Y. >&

Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning

No one ? Really ?!? Y. > Le 13 juin 2017 à 10:05, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <benge...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > Dear Foundry community, > > I'm about to revive an old trolly thread, but boy are they fun. > > With the growth of IPv6 DFZ over 32K e

[f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning

Dear Foundry community, I'm about to revive an old trolly thread, but boy are they fun. With the growth of IPv6 DFZ over 32K entries, we have been receiving the following syslog error message on our MLXe gear : Jun 13 07:51:02:A:CAM IPv6 partition warning: total 32768 (reserved 0), free 6, slot

Re: [f-nsp] CER-RT X4 MP CPU

Better believe in santa than expect hardware upgrades for this platform. Too bad, it's a very nice capable 1RU PE / BGP RR device. Best regards. > Le 20 avr. 2017 à 08:52, Clement Cavadore a écrit : > >> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 10:46 +1000, Patrick Cole wrote: >> I was

Re: [f-nsp] Extreme Networks bought MLX/VDX/SLX - what about future ?

Hello Wilbur, Will SLX-OS finally support a true hitless ISSU ? As we all know, that was a major lack of the NetIron platform. Best regards. 2017-04-13 21:07 GMT+02:00 Wilbur Smith : > > > As SLX-OS adopts more routing & carrier features from CES & CER, you’ll > see a ToR

Re: [f-nsp] Extreme Networks bought MLX/VDX/SLX - what about future ?

Hi, That' is true. But distributors have worked around this by creating important stocks of units locally before they were hit by RoHS. I know that because we were able to by CER recently. Best regards. > Le 12 avr. 2017 à 22:05, i3D.net - Martijn Schmidt a > écrit

Re: [f-nsp] High CPU on LP

Also, what code version are you running ? Best regards. > Le 30 mars 2017 à 07:57, Eldon Koyle a > écrit : > > What protocols are you running over the GRE tunnel? > > It might be helpful to include the GRE config from both sides. > > The diagnostic guide

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

5.8g tentative GA is for May. Best regards. > Le 21 mars 2017 à 23:10, Daniel Schmidt a écrit : > > To follow up, I've been much happier with 05800fa. > >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Tony Sarendal wrote: >> >> 2017-01-28 11:08 GMT+01:00

Re: [f-nsp] Basic SNMP MIBs missing

Le 13 mars 2017 à 05:21, <frnk...@iname.com> <frnk...@iname.com> a écrit : > > Isn’t what’s being requested already available from the CLI? > > > > Frank > > > > *From:* foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > <foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net&

Re: [f-nsp] Basic SNMP MIBs missing

ing requested already available from the CLI? > > Frank > > From: foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Wilbur Smith > Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 1:37 PM > To: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <benge...@gmail.com>; foundry-nsp@puck.nether.ne

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

Dear community, For those who might be interested / hit by that SNMP bug regarding IPv6 BGP sessions' state, it has been officially addressed under DEFECT000633962. Best regards. 2017-02-15 16:33 GMT+01:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <benge...@gmail.com>: > Hi Jörg, > > I'm no whe

[f-nsp] Basic SNMP MIBs missing

Dear Community, Just wanted to share a basic / silly / simple experience I have gone through with our favorite $VENDOR. We use observium as an NMS for our backbone (MLXe / CERT, FCX,VDX) and I recently noticed lack of support for basic SNMP MIBs, in particular ones responsible for gathering

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

l stick to tftp > and/or the „old“ scp way for now. > > Jörg > > On 1 Feb 2017, at 7:05, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > > SCP based upgrade is possible, my SE confirmed that some time ago. >> >> It has been introduced officially as

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

SCP based upgrade is possible, my SE confirmed that some time ago. It has been introduced officially as a feature in release 6.1, look at the release notes. HTH.. > Le 1 févr. 2017 à 05:02, Richard Laager a écrit : > >> On 01/31/2017 06:01 PM, Daniel Schmidt wrote: >> I

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

e ran 5.6. Of course, perhaps 5.8 would be > more stable without the cards so a grain of proverbial salt applies. > >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr >> <benge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Care to elaborate please ? >> >> Y. >&g

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

Care to elaborate please ? Y. > Le 27 janv. 2017 à 18:22, Daniel Schmidt a écrit : > > 5.8 is about as stable as a disgruntled postal worker. I wish they'd keep > going with 5.6. > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Tim Warnock wrote: >> Also

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

3 10:40:23:W:LACP: ethernet 2/4 state changes from DOWN to >> LACP-BLOCKED >> Jan 23 10:40:22:W:LACP: ethernet 2/4 state changes from LACP-BLOCKED to >> DOWN >> Jan 23 10:40:22:I:LACP: Port 2/4 mux state transition: aggregate -> not >> aggregate (reason: peer is out

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

at >was introduced and fixed a couple of letter releases ago since we had >already locked everything down with receive ACL's to begin with. But >other than that, smooth sailing! > > Best regards, >Martijn > >>On 12/16/2016 06:42 PM, Youssef Ben

[f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

All, It came out à few weeks ago and seems it to be the lucky charm... At least for us. It was also designated as the new official target path. Any feedbacks from out there ? Any head acks in perspective ? Thank you. ___ foundry-nsp mailing list

Re: [f-nsp] Brocade SLX 9850

have indicated they're going to use > the SLX. > > On 13 September 2016 18:53:37 CEST, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr < > yous...@720.fr> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> At first glance, I don't think so. My SE told the NetIron product line was >> here to stay for wh

Re: [f-nsp] Brocade SLX 9850

Hi, At first glance, I don't think so. My SE told the NetIron product line was here to stay for while, confirme by HQ corp last summer. But I'll be meeting tomorrow with our local team / rep and they will undoubtly bring it on the table. Seems to me they are finally bringing the fight to the

Re: [f-nsp] Does VRF still take CAM resources from 'ipv4 vpn' in later MLXe code?

ll attempt to find > its status. > > From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <yous...@720.fr> > Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 12:36 PM > To: David Hubbard <dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> > Cc: "foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net" <foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Su

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe BGP Next Hop Not Reachable

NJ 07054* > > > *Colocation • Cloud Hosting • Network Connectivity • Managed Services* > Follow us on Twitter: @atlanticmetro <https://twitter.com/atlanticmetro> *• > Like us on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/atlanticmetro>* > www.atlanticmetro.net >

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe slow on 10G doing inter-vlan routing

> and just for reference the documentation for the commands: > > > http://www.brocade.com/content/html/en/configuration-guide/NI_05800a_SWITCHING/GUID-04EDFD31-E5FB-4593-8434-0DF8EDB3249E.html > > Have a nice day! > ------------ > On Wed, 5/25/16

Re: [f-nsp] Code recommendations + Broadcast storm control

Dear Nick, You should probably take a look at Brocade's recommended Target path versions. Personnally, I have been running multiple stacks of FCX-648S as pure L2 switchs using FCXS 740b with no issues. I can't comment on broadcast storm control as I don't use it. Hope this helps. Best

Re: [f-nsp] Brocade VDX6730 inband management ACL

t; Clément > > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 15:34 +0100, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > > Hello Clement, > > > > > > How about this for telnet : > > > > telnet@er01-par01(config)#telnet access-group ? > > ASCII string Standard Access List Name > >

Re: [f-nsp] Brocade VDX6730 inband management ACL

the VDX > is being used as a router. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I apply an ip access group, all the > routed traffic will be impacted by the ACL. > > I am just interested in applying such an ACL to the traffic towards the > switches itselves... > > Clément > > > O

Re: [f-nsp] Brocade VDX6730 inband management ACL

for the equivalent of "telnet/ssh > access-group XX" in NOS 4.1.x. > > Anyone know that ? > > Thanks ! > -- > Clément Cavadore > > ___ > foundry-nsp mailing list > foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net > htt

Re: [f-nsp] IronWare 8.0.40 not supported on most products...

this action. Anybody >> has same point of view like me ? >> >> Rob >> >> >> ___ >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >&g

Re: [f-nsp] MAC Corruption on CER ICL Links

Dear Dan, Could you please specify code version you are running ? Best regards. > Le 4 janv. 2016 à 20:53, Dan White a écrit : > > We are experiencing what appears to be MAC corruption on the ICL link > between a pair of CERs configured as an MCT cluster. We have seen this >

Re: [f-nsp] /31 prefixes on Ethernet

My bad, I got confused with the introduction of 127-bit IPv6 interface addresses in NI5.6. Best regards. 2015-12-22 16:31 GMT+01:00 Jeroen Oldenhof <jer...@cj2.nl>: > Works on ver V5.3.0cT163 > > > Op 22-12-2015 om 15:13 schreef Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr: > > Hello, >

Re: [f-nsp] arp problem on brocade mlx

92 > 8192 8192 > No > > > > > while my arp usage is of 2k (as seen by show arp) > > > > Any ideas what i > could look at or what might cause this? Logs do not mention > anything relevant. > > > > > Thanks a lot,

Re: [f-nsp] FCX stack problem and maybe move to 8?

mailing list >> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >> >> >> >> ___ >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >> > > > ___ > foundry-nsp mailing list > foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.8 feedbacks (was Netiron 5.7 feedbacks)

Dear Community, 580c has been released yesterday. Any feedbacks will be appreciated. Best regards. 2015-08-05 16:25 GMT+02:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <yous...@720.fr>: > Hello Steven, > > Nasty indeed. Was it fixed by BTAC ? Were you able to test 05800b ? > > Best regard

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Dear Community, 560g has been out for quit a while now and seems rock solid from what I can read. It's on the official NI Target Path. Anyone been able to test it and willing to share a feedback ? Best regards. 2015-02-08 9:20 GMT+01:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <yous...@720.fr>: >

Re: [f-nsp] Flapping stack

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

started looking at 5.7d mostly for the LACP flaps on LP insertion. But the list of fixed bugs is long (100+). /Tias On 04/08/15 23:38, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Dear community, Pinging about this. Any feedbacks to share ? Best regards. Le 30 juil. 2015 à 00:21, Takahiro

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

Dear community, Pinging about this. Any feedbacks to share ? Best regards. Le 30 juil. 2015 à 00:21, Takahiro Masuda tmas...@vpls.net a écrit : Dear community, Pinging about this. Any feedbacks to share ? Best regards. ___

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.8 feedbacks (was Netiron 5.7 feedbacks)

Dear community, Pinging about this. Any feedbacks to share ? Best regards. Le 30 juil. 2015 à 06:49, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Hello, Yes, there is that too. Any feedbacks on 5.8 ? Best regards. 2015-07-30 0:21 GMT+02:00 Takahiro Masuda tmas

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

Dear community, Pinging about this. Any feedbacks to share ? Best regards. Le 15 juil. 2015 à 12:21, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Dear f-nsp list, 57d has been out for a few days now. Upon reading the release notes, it seems quite a lot of bugs were fixed. Has

Re: [f-nsp] Trouble reaching brocade.com over ipv6

Hi, I read a thread about this on a french ML a few days. Try lowering your computer MTU to 1480B or below. It seems IPv6 PMTUD is broken which could explain this behavior ;-) HTH. Y. Le 15 juil. 2015 à 18:52, Thomas St-Pierre tstpie...@iweb.com a écrit : Hi! Brocade’s IPv6 site

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

Dear f-nsp list, 57d has been out for a few days now. Upon reading the release notes, it seems quite a lot of bugs were fixed. Has anyone started testing it ? Best regards. 2015-04-24 14:50 GMT+02:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr: Hello Mathias, What's do you mean by improved

Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 on MLX stopped working

a double edged sword. Some people want to know all the bugs, others will use all the bugs as ammo. The reality is everyone has software bugs, the difference is how many they tell you about. Mike On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr wrote

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr mailto:yous...@720.fr: Hello Mathias, What about core protocols (IGP / MPLS / BFD / etc.) ? We don't use any of them so I don't know. /Tias Best regards. 2014-11-17 8:28 GMT+01:00 Mathias

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

have the luxury of waiting for 5.7d or later, unfortunately. -- Eric Cables On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr wrote: Hi, Saw that. Waiting for 5.6g release (mid-june) which is part of the Target Path. Still, I'm interested in hearing feedbacks

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

discovered in v5.7.0b? -- Eric Cables On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Mathias Wolkert t...@netnod.se wrote: Hi 17 nov 2014 kl. 08:55 skrev Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr: Hello Mathias, What about core protocols (IGP / MPLS / BFD / etc.) ? We don't use any of them so

Re: [f-nsp] VLL local termination

Hello Clement, I don't recall seing anything mentionned about routing over VLL on the latest NI roadmap I've seen at Brocade EBC (2 weeks ago). Let me check and get back to you. Best regards. Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:03, Josh Galvez j...@zevlag.com a écrit : Clement, it is possible to add

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Dear all, 5.6.f has been out there for a few days now. Chears. Le 4 déc. 2014 à 08:18, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Dear All, I just got yesterday from my SE the details of NI 5.6e patch release (GA targeted for 12/16) and the DEFECTs that will be corrected

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

messages on CER-RT (reported by Clement C) corrected. You can all read about it here : http://freepdfhosting.com/34b6a9eb39.pdf HTH. Y. 2014-10-05 17:17 GMT+02:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr: Hi Mathias, Has it been validated by BTAC ? Any ETA on a defentive correction ? Best

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Unexpected CPU load on NetIron CER

-- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

Hi, Good to hear that it is working as it's supposed to ! Anything else worth reporting back ? Best regards. Le 28 oct. 2014 à 14:11, Mathias Wolkert t...@netnod.se a écrit : On 10/28/2014 08:39 AM, Mathias Wolkert wrote: 5.7b is GA now anyway. I got lp auto upgrade to work with FPGA

Re: [f-nsp] LAG on BR-MLX-10GX20-M and NI-MLX-10Gx8-D

Hello, Unless there is a funky limitation somewhere, I don't see why that wouldn't possible. Best regards. Le 20 oct. 2014 à 17:25, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua a écrit : Hi All, we're planning to replace some NI-MLX-10Gx8-D modules with new BR-MLX-10GX20-M ones. We have a

Re: [f-nsp] IP/ARP: IP address x.y.z.t MAC movement detected, changed from (...)

with that ? Thanks, ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

it out now. First one looks ok. I was wrong andso was my SE. snmp counters are borked and disabling snmp cache is a workaround. Apart from that 5.6d seems ok. /Tias /Tias 28 sep 2014 kl. 10:48 skrev Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr: Hello Eldon, Any feedbacks from

Re: [f-nsp] Mapping QinQ VLANs into VPLS instances

Hello, Anyone ? Y. 2014-10-01 12:07 GMT+02:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr: Dear Community, A provider of ours is handing off clients VLANs over a fiber interco using QinQ (outer VLAN is for transport on their network and inner VLAN is our end client). We actually terminate

Re: [f-nsp] Mapping QinQ VLANs into VPLS instances

MODERATED 3003 vll-peer A.B.C.D untag e 7/2 SSH@MODERATED#show vlan e 7/2 VLL name MODERATED, VLL ID: 3003, VLAN:1 Untagged Best regards, Martijn On 10/02/2014 05:37 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hello Martijn, Would care to share some

Re: [f-nsp] Mapping QinQ VLANs into VPLS instances

regards, Martijn On 10/02/2014 08:23 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Dear Martijn, Thank you for your feedback but I'm trying to achieve the other way around ie strip Provider's outer VLAN. We do agree on the fact that provider-facing port has to be declared as expecting QinQ

[f-nsp] Mapping QinQ VLANs into VPLS instances

-inner-vlan-Y)#tagged Ethernet 2/1 X being SP transport VLAN (outer VLAN) and Y being clustomer VLAN (inner VLAN). Does that sound about right to you ? Thanks for the feedbacks. Best regards. -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

disable), which has eliminated the symptoms for us. I'm not sure what the other ramifications of that change will be. -- Eldon Koyle Information Technology Utah State University -- BOFH excuse #192: runaway cat on system. On Sep 28 10:48+0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hello

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hi, This DEFECT isn't listed in the official Brocade KB. Can you tell us a little bit more about it (affected versions, etc.) ? I will ask my SE to look it up. Thanks for the feedback. Best regards. Le 5 sept. 2014 à 21:08, Eldon Koyle esk

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe combination of -X and -X2 linecards

/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe combination of -X and -X2 linecards

yet, they should ship by the end of the year. Mike On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr wrote: Hello, We are not in that case but I was asking myself the same question as we are thinkig about X2 LCs. Y. 2014-09-12 10:52 GMT+02:00 André

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.7 feedbacks

Hello Tim, Which platforms are you running your tests on ? What kind of LCs ? Best regards. Le 12 sept. 2014 à 23:23, Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org a écrit : LAB Tested 5.7.0 and 5.7.0a so far. New VLL - LSP code works great. Already have 2 defects raised for the router reloading

Re: [f-nsp] Software management NetIron/Ironware

and I can't seem to get scp tp work. TFTP is no fun when box is 10ms away. Any tips? /Tias ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

there. -- Eldon Koyle Information Technology Utah State University On Sep 04 21:14+0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hello Eldon, Any news from BTAC ? Best regards. Le 18 août 2014 à 21:00, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Hello Eldon, Any news from BTAC ? Best

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Hello Eldon, Any news from BTAC ? Best regards. Le 18 août 2014 à 21:00, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Hello Eldon, Any news from BTAC ? Best regards. ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http

Re: [f-nsp] FCX code trains

Hello, I have been running three stacks (2 members) with code 740b with no issues what so ever for 2+ years. We are running them as pur L2 switchs, nothing more. Best regards. Le 3 sept. 2014 à 23:02, Jethro R Binks jethro.bi...@strath.ac.uk a écrit : A while ago there was talk about

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

of concepts to each other without consideration of their relation to experience. -- Albert Einstein On Aug 13 6:33+0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hi Eldon, On which platform did you notice this ? Did you open a case with BTAC ? Best regards. Le 13 août 2014 à 00:50

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

www.crissic.net Crissic Solutions, LLC *From:* foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr *Sent:* Friday, July 18, 2014 8:43 AM *To:* Josh Galvez *Cc:* foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks Hi, Little update

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

to it and then delete the message from your computer. *From:* foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr *Sent:* Monday, May 26, 2014 6:48 PM *To:* Wouter de Jong *Cc:* foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Hi, I hope this one will be more mature and stable :-) Y. 2014-05-26 10:26 GMT+02:00 Wouter de Jong wou...@widexs.nl: Hi Youssef, OK, that is the same date I received :) Regards, Wouter -Original Message- From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr [mailto:yous...@720.fr] Sent

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Hi, Interesting... Did TAC give you 56d GA release date ? Y. Le 25 mai 2014 à 12:57, Wouter de Jong wou...@widexs.nl a écrit : Hi, (Apologies for not quoting, etc as I don't have the original email in my mailbox) Too bad that 5.6 seems 'buggy' ... some of it's new features look

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Hi, Answering my own post. Just heard from my SE, 56d GA is targeted for July 16th. Best regards. Le 25 mai 2014 à 20:34, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Hi, Interesting... Did TAC give you 56d GA release date ? Y. Le 25 mai 2014 à 12:57, Wouter de Jong wou

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

-Strasse 70 CH-8400 Winterthur Switzerland http://www.init7.net/ Am 23.05.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr: Hello, Thanks for the feedback. I was planing to run 56b but Brocade advised us not to do that because of TSB TSB 2014-184-A : This is a high severity

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

to MAC 001b.2109.d2a6 / port 1/13 There is no MAC change or physical port change, 1/13 is connected to an IX (tagged mode, vlan 2 + ve2), and is route-only. Regards, -- Clément On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 11:57 +, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hello, Anyone else ? Best regards

[f-nsp] MLXe line card auto-upgrade

Hello, Has anyone tried line card auto upgrade feature for MLXe ? Thanks. -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe line card auto-upgrade

Hello Steven, I share your feeling here. Y. 2014-03-18 15:29 GMT+01:00 Steven Raymond sraym...@acedatacenter.com: On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:20 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hello, Has anyone tried line card auto upgrade feature for MLXe ? Thanks. Yes, I tested it a bit

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe - Line Card Swap - Associated Configuration

Institute of Technology ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] BGP sflow and IPv6

-- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] IronWare version on XMR-4000

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Hello, Anyone else ? Best regards. Le 19 févr. 2014 à 09:48, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr a écrit : Hello, Thank you for the feedback Clement. Looking for someone running MLXe + CER-RT with : ISIS / BFD / MPLS-LDP (VPLS mostly) / MPLS-RSVP-TE / BGP full views Very

[f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

Hello, Anyone running NI5.6 on MLXe/CER-RT out there ? Any gotchas of nasty things to be aware of ? Thank you for your feedbacks. Best regards. -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks

... I have been running it on a couple of my CER-RT, withing a quite simple setup (BGP Fullview with IX/MPLS-LDP/OSPF) and everything went fine, in my setup. -- Clément Cavadore On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:03 +0100, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hello, Anyone running NI5.6 on MLXe/CER-RT

Re: [f-nsp] CER bfd

and and gets config Thanks http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 540e feedbacks

, but 5.4.00d has been very solid. Mike On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr wrote: Hello, Anyone running 540e out there ? Best regards. ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http

[f-nsp] NetIron 540e feedbacks

Hello, Anyone running 540e out there ? Best regards. ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] MLX Route issues after 5.4.0d upgrade

Hello James, I have been running 540d successfully for a few months now, never seen such symptoms. We don't offer BGP transit to our customers so my shared experience might not prove relevant to you. Have you read 540d release notes ? IIRC, this behavior doesn't ring a bell. Did you report

  1   2   >