RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-26 Thread Neil Martin
t; AT AT i-net@CCM i-netcc: (bcc: Neil Martin/US/PC/HUNTSMAN) Subject: RE: Back on the Soap Box

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-26 Thread Stear, Bo
OTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 11:29 AM To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List' Subject: RE: Back on the Soap Box There are a few of things I need to bring up: First, besides Bo, has anyone had success with doing an upgrade to 6.2 and not having to reboot the CP's. Bo says that he

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-26 Thread Stear, Bo
iority over any 'new' offerings. 3. That being said, I want to get on with this new mission and get online upgrades for myself and you. -Original Message- From: John Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 11:29 AM To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List'

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-26 Thread Joe Markham
oe Markham -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Miller Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 11:29 AM To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List' Subject: RE: Back on the Soap Box There are a few of things I need to bring up: First, besides Bo, has any

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-26 Thread John Metsker
RE: Back on the Soap Box Darn, I was beaten to the punch.  I had hoped to utilize the lull before the storm to propose a new 'tall pole' to vote on at the Users Group Meeting which I hope will can act as an umbrella to capture many other specific development issues (even Bo&

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-26 Thread John Miller
There are a few of things I need to bring up: First, besides Bo, has anyone had success with doing an upgrade to 6.2 and not having to reboot the CP's. Bo says that he has seen it work, yet I have had sources in Foxboro recommend against doing it. Does anyone know why we would be told this? Se

Re: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-22 Thread Kevin FitzGerrell
Hi all! On the subject of true on-line upgrades, if the process wasn't critical enough to have dual busses and fault tolerant CPs, then it's probably not so critical it can't be shut down for upgrades every couple of years -- just my opinion of course. In my plant, downtime is very expensive, bu

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-21 Thread Williams, Dave G SUKOP-CME/72/04
1144 __ > -- > From: Stear, Bo[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 July 2000 19:58 > To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List' > Subject: RE: Back on the Soap Box > > I would think that the most likely target

RE: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-20 Thread Stear, Bo
the impossible. -Original Message- From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 1:48 PM To: Foxboro DCS Mail List Subject: Re: Back on the Soap Box To add to what Neil just said, what about having to EPROM the FBMs, do we have to have redundant

Re: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-20 Thread David Johnson
To add to what Neil just said, what about having to EPROM the FBMs, do we have to have redundant I/O too? David --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work

Re: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-20 Thread Neil Martin
: (bcc: Neil Martin/US/PC/HUNTSMAN) i-net Subject: Re: Back on the Soap Box 07/19/00 04:51 PM Folks, I also would very much like to have bootless CP upgrades. Since it can be a complicated issue an