~
From: John Metsker
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:28 PM
To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List'
Subject: RE: PLC Question
List,
I have been meaning to chime in on this topic, but I was stuck on the road
when it was first raised and I have struggling to catch up on a lot of
things ever
Re: I will be able to make the choice of a Windoze based system that has
logged a few hours running process facilities as opposed to helping Invensys
with development.
Without trying to address all of the issues being covered by this thread -
most of which are way beyond my purview, I must
:
oject.org Subject: RE: PLC Question
)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Martin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: PLC Question
Alex,
I think
Is it just me, or is this ridiculous? Does their documentation say writes
don't work well, this is a read-only device, good write performance is
option # xxx-yyy, call your account manager for details, or something? Was
your product a beta version, and did you get a concomitant discount
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: PLC Question
oject.org
DCS Mail List' Foxboro
cc:
Subject: RE: PLC Question
I've been wanting to ask this question for months, but the latest thread
regarding the new architecture makes it all the more relative. But first, is
Invensys abandoning I/A on Solaris? If all we're seeing is a refinement or
rethinking
4. Micro I/A with AB Ethernet interface.
This was actually something I was very interested in until I found out the
true performance and it isn't much better than the AB30. I would still end up
with many stations.
We tried the Micro I/A w/ AB Ethernet interface about 9 or 10 months ago. It
that could use
this technology today. Is that too much to ask?
Glen Bounds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corn Products International
- Original Message -
From: Jason Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PLC Question
Glen,
I don't think there is a real good answer, but I've seen it done. I have
Hear Hear on the 70 bit...
-Original Message-
From: Glen Bounds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: Re: PLC Question
First, thanks for all the responses.
Second, I have issues with all of the listed methods
+ - without problems. Alas, I cannot say
that about Integrator 30s.
Corey Clingo
Sr. Engineer
BASF Corporation
Stear, Bo [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/14/2001 09:21:38 AM
Please respond to Foxboro DCS Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List' Foxboro
cc:
Subject: RE: PLC Question
, September 12, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: RE: PLC Question
Glen,
I don't think there is a real good answer, but I've seen it done. I have
copied some old information I found below for reference (from Foxboro tech).
There are several options depending on the amount of data and type
Contact Gary Camfield at (918)258-2639 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] He has
successfully installed ControlLogix on the AB30 Gateway.
---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
postings from this list
Foxboro does not yet endorse connectivity to ControlLogix.
We (FeedForward, a Foxboro Systems Integrator) have, however, successfully
integrated the two for one of our customers.
I was not directly involved with this project, but from my understanding, it
requires no more than entering the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glen Bounds
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: Re: PLC Question
I for one would be interested in some more detailed information.
I have asked Foxboro about this for a couple
OPC
software which addresses data in the native ControLogic naming structure.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glen Bounds
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: Re: PLC Question
I for one would
16 matches
Mail list logo
