Sergei Gorelkin schrieb:
Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 12:06:51 AM, Florian wrote:
FK Vinzent Hoefler schrieb:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 09:58, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:40, Yury Sidorov wrote:
Maybe other way to detect SSE support exists...
CPUID?
To be more precise,
Yury Sidorov wrote:
CPU supports it. But CPU support doesn't mean OS support. And to check
if the OS supports SSE you've to execute an sse instruction and handle
the exception.
Florian, to prevent SIGILL on non SSE CPUs we can first check CPUID and
execute sse instruction only if CPUID
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
Yury Sidorov wrote:
CPU supports it. But CPU support doesn't mean OS support. And to check
if the OS supports SSE you've to execute an sse instruction and handle
the exception.
Florian, to prevent SIGILL on non SSE CPUs we can first check CPUID
and execute sse
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08.39, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check because I
didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
A PII with 256MB ram is my main development machine. Do you see why
MSEide+MSEgui is so fast? ;-)
From
Vinzent Hoefler schrieb:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 06:39, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check
because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
Well, if the OS supports SSE and thus no SIGILL is generated, what would
be
