Re: [fpc-devel] Is lnet compilation working?

2009-09-11 Thread Aleš Katona
Thanks for the patch, Micha will look into it. As for the absolute, I'll update lNet in fppkg when 0.6.3 goes out (hopefuly soon). Ales ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Is lnet compilation working?

2009-09-11 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:18 +0200, Aleš Katona wrote: > What did you change? Btw. the forward declaration bug in windows was fixed in > lNet trunk, so windows users can use it with fpc fixes branch at least... > (didn't try fpc trunk). Replaced the 'var lServerSocker: TLHTTPServerSocket absolu

Re: [fpc-devel] comparing methods

2009-09-11 Thread Mattias Gärtner
Zitat von Michael Schnell : Mattias Gärtner wrote: The @ operator is more than "address of". Hmm "Address of" is not that simple in itself. :) With a "Procedure of Object", "@" of course handles the Self pointer, too. I suppose to find the address of a function "@" uses the Virtual Method

Re: [fpc-devel] comparing methods

2009-09-11 Thread Nino Luciani
On Thursday 10 September 2009 17:52:44 Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Ivo Steinmann schrieb: > > 1. Using =nil or Assigned should result in the same. > > Afaik not, this was one of the reasons for assigned. > I have always used Assigned() to test whether a pointer is 'valid' or is nil. Thus Assiged()

Re: [fpc-devel] comparing methods

2009-09-11 Thread Michael Schnell
Mattias Gärtner wrote: > > The @ operator is more than "address of". > Hmm "Address of" is not that simple in itself. :) With a "Procedure of Object", "@" of course handles the Self pointer, too. I suppose to find the address of a function "@" uses the Virtual Method Table found with the Self