Any hints about the package?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=15795
thanks,
dmitry
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hello, FPC developers' list
Why dwarf information has so big debug files (comparing with stabs) on
windows?
lazarus.exe: 11MB
lazarus.dbg: 219Mb
As I remember with stabs I had something about 100MB for debug info. And
as I remember dwarf debug info must be less fat as stabs.
Best regards,
Hi,
I looked at the FPC 2.4.1 output of the 'fpc -h' command and couldn't see
any reference to the -Wx parameter.
Under Linux the following information is missing, yet this information is
displayed in the Windows version of FPC.
-
-Wx Target-specific options
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Under Linux the following information is missing, yet this
information is
displayed in the Windows version of FPC.
It's unrelated to Linux vs Windows. Those options are enabled/disabled
per architecture, and I bet you are using a 32 bit
On 16 Mar 2010, at 15:58, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Why dwarf information has so big debug files (comparing with stabs)
on windows?
Because Windows (just like Darwin) does not support referring to DWARF
debug info from one object file to another, so a lot of debug
information is duplicated in
On 16 Mar 2010, at 16:22, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 15:58, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Why dwarf information has so big debug files (comparing with stabs)
on windows?
Because Windows (just like Darwin) does not support referring to
DWARF debug info from one object file to another,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 15:58, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Why dwarf information has so big debug files (comparing with stabs) on
windows?
Because Windows (just like Darwin) does not support referring to DWARF debug
info
On 16 Mar 2010, at 16:37, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 15:58, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Why dwarf information has so big debug files (comparing with
stabs) on
windows?
Because Windows (just like
On 16 Mar 2010, at 16:41, Paul Ishenin wrote:
But 200 Mb of info for 10Mb executable is too much. How do you think?
I personally don't care at all.
I don't believe that other compilers on windows generates so fat
output for dwarf. Do you know any similar numbers for gcc?
No, since I
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Under Linux the following information is missing, yet this information is
displayed in the Windows version of FPC.
It's unrelated to Linux vs Windows. Those options are enabled/disabled per
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru wrote:
16.03.2010 22:33, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Why dwarf information has so big debug files (comparing with stabs) on
windows?
Because Windows (just like Darwin) does not support referring to DWARF
debug info from one object file
11 matches
Mail list logo
