Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: ACK. There is no *need* to use MakeSkel with a project, but using this option offers many advantages. When we look at new packages, some general tasks come into mind: [snip] I'd prefer that all

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: When we look at new packages, some general tasks come into mind: [snip] I'd prefer that all beforementioned tasks can be accomplished by a single program, by only giving it an project file, task, and task-specific options. Feel free to create this program.

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:41:32 +0100 Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote: [...] The documentation related features could become Lazarus plug-ins, of course, similar to or as an extension of the FPDoc Editor window. But this already existing support makes it *harder* to add further

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-17 Thread Sven Barth
On 12.12.2011 19:50, Jonas Maebe wrote: Hi, A new FPC JVM snapshot has been put online at http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM The main new feature is full fledged support for Android/Dalvik, including a Pascal translation of the Android SDK classes. To compile for Android rather than for the

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread michael . vancanneyt
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: Feel free to create this program. If I may give some advice: the tasks you outline belong in a Documentation writers IDE. To some degree, maybe. But checking for updates should be doable by a script, without

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb: On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: Feel free to create this program. If I may give some advice: the tasks you outline belong in a Documentation writers IDE. To some degree, maybe. But checking for updates

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Mattias Gaertner schrieb: On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:41:32 +0100 Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote: [...] The documentation related features could become Lazarus plug-ins, of course, similar to or as an extension of the FPDoc Editor window. But this already existing support makes

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-17 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 17 Dec 2011, at 16:15, Sven Barth wrote: So, I have now tested your new snapshot (nice that make finally works in the top level ^^) and I've got the same error as before. The error occurs when I try to instantiate a custom class of mine that implements an (inner) interface from the

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb: On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: Feel free to create this program. If I may give some advice: the tasks you outline belong in a Documentation writers IDE.

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-17 Thread Sven Barth
On 17.12.2011 17:51, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 17 Dec 2011, at 16:15, Sven Barth wrote: So, I have now tested your new snapshot (nice that make finally works in the top level ^^) and I've got the same error as before. The error occurs when I try to instantiate a custom class of mine that

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-17 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 17 Dec 2011, at 20:25, Sven Barth wrote: Btw: can it be that not all Makefiles have been regenerated? I issued a make clean with cpu and os set to jvm and android respectively and in $fpcdir/utils the process complained that jvm-android is not supported. I compiled fpcmake and

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-17 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: I have done so for years, with the existing tools, using the Makefiles. No changes were necessary. Can you explain that a bit more? I'm not a professional commandline user, perhaps I'm doing something stupid? I just do a make updatexml or make updatefclxml or