Make parallisation (was Re: [fpc-devel] New less verbose compilation of trunk)

2013-01-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Apologies for reviving an old thread, but I've been reinstalling Debian on one of may larger systems and rebuilding FPC on it. Sven Barth wrote: Am 07.03.2012 13:51, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: On 7 March 2012 12:27, Marco van de Voort wrote: IIRC add FPMAKEOPT='-T 3' (3= number of

Re: Make parallisation (was Re: [fpc-devel] New less verbose compilation of trunk)

2013-01-19 Thread Sven Barth
On 19.01.2013 11:54, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Am 07.03.2012 13:51, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: On 7 March 2012 12:27, Marco van de Voort wrote: IIRC add FPMAKEOPT='-T 3' (3= number of paralel threads) What version did this start working with- 2.6 or 2.7? The need for

[fpc-devel] arm-embedded buid broken since rev 23325

2013-01-19 Thread Michael Ring
Today I found some time to research since when excactly arm-embedded does not compile anymore, I found that since revision 23325 compile does not work anymore, can anybody help, it seems that the problem itself is hidden somewhere else in code... Michael Error Message: /bin/mkdir -p

Re: Make parallisation (was Re: [fpc-devel] New less verbose compilation of trunk)

2013-01-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Sven Barth wrote: On 19.01.2013 11:54, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Am 07.03.2012 13:51, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: On 7 March 2012 12:27, Marco van de Voort wrote: IIRC add FPMAKEOPT='-T 3' (3= number of paralel threads) What version did this start working with- 2.6 or

[fpc-devel] dwarf for array [ 0..191] of

2013-01-19 Thread Martin
Since I don't know the fpc cdoebase, I can not check this myself. I suspect it is a gdb issue. But if it is not to much work, maybe someone who does know fpc dwarf generation can check that it is not fpc? I got the following source: type TFoo = array [0..191] of integer; and in gdb

Re: [fpc-devel] dwarf for array [ 0..191] of

2013-01-19 Thread Sven Barth
On 19.01.2013 15:17, Martin wrote: Since I don't know the fpc cdoebase, I can not check this myself. I suspect it is a gdb issue. But if it is not to much work, maybe someone who does know fpc dwarf generation can check that it is not fpc? I got the following source: type TFoo = array

Re: [fpc-devel] arm-embedded buid broken since rev 23325

2013-01-19 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 19.01.2013 12:18, schrieb Michael Ring: Today I found some time to research since when excactly arm-embedded does not compile anymore, I found that since revision 23325 compile does not work anymore, can anybody help, it seems that the problem itself is hidden somewhere else in code...

Re: [fpc-devel] arm-embedded buid broken since rev 23325

2013-01-19 Thread Michael Ring
Thank you very much Florian, this problem is now indeed fixed. I have encountered another one: /Users/ring/devel/fpc/rtl/units/arm-embedded/sysutils.s: Assembler messages: /Users/ring/devel/fpc/rtl/units/arm-embedded/sysutils.s:20800: Error: thumb conditional instruction should be in IT block

Re: [fpc-devel] arm-embedded buid broken since rev 23325

2013-01-19 Thread Jeppe Græsdal Johansen
Could you write the complete command line you use for compiling? Den 19-01-2013 22:58, Michael Ring skrev: Thank you very much Florian, this problem is now indeed fixed. I have encountered another one: /Users/ring/devel/fpc/rtl/units/arm-embedded/sysutils.s: Assembler messages: