This is good advice.
It happened to me once or twice ;) that a certain company with ever
changing names used my sourcecode and licensed it under their own closed
terms because i included the term: use as you like.
If the owner wants that not to happen,, choose any of these licenses
mentioned.
Thaddy schrieb:
It happened to me once or twice ;) that a certain company with ever
changing names used my sourcecode and licensed it under their own closed
terms because i included the term: use as you like.
Better: free for private use.
If the owner wants that not to happen,, choose any
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
If the owner wants that not to happen,, choose any of these licenses
mentioned.
This is really important. Without huge legal fees I can't get my
intellectual property back
Sorry, that's nonsense. You still have all rights on your own software,
no need to get
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Tue, January 14, 2014 11:27, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote:
Well, all open source projects need a license, otherwise they're not
very useful legally speaking, so he'll need to pick one. If he doesn't
care what people do with his code he can use a
On Tue, January 14, 2014 15:38, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
If the owner wants that not to happen,, choose any of these licenses
mentioned.
This is really important. Without huge legal fees I can't get my
intellectual property back
Sorry, that's nonsense. You
Mark Morgan Lloyd schrieb:
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
If the owner wants that not to happen,, choose any of these licenses
mentioned.
This is really important. Without huge legal fees I can't get my
intellectual property back
Sorry, that's nonsense. You still have all rights on your
