On 01.07.2019 23:25, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I understand. But all depends on how the compiler parses and evaluates
this.
Let me put brackets to make it more clear: is
MyTest.StringArray[i]
parsed & evaluated as
(MyTest.StringArray)([(i)])
or as
(MyTest.StringArray[(i)])
In the former
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 21:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 19:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul
On 01.07.2019 21:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
If the compiler encounters "Mytest.StringArray" it can be evaluated
only as the non-indexed overload.
Well... We can of course discuss forever, and still not agree.
I suggest we let the compiler people
Hello together!
For a project at work I need to run 16-bit x86 code on a bare x86
hardware (more precisely a 8086 VM). Considering that i8086-embedded had
been added to FPC nearly exactly 3 years ago I though I'd give it a try
and cross compiled the units for the tiny memory model. However
On 01.07.2019 21:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 19:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
From the above example
On 01.07.2019 21:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
If the compiler encounters "Mytest.StringArray" it can be evaluated
only as the non-indexed overload.
Well... We can of course discuss forever, and still not agree.
I suggest we let the compiler people have the last word on this. They
know best.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 19:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 15:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
TTest = class
public
On 01.07.2019 19:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 15:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
TTest = class
public
// ...
property StringArray[Index:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 15:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
Yes, I’ve made a patch to allow overriding the actual property
(https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35772).
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 15:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
Yes, I’ve made a patch to allow overriding the actual property
(https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35772).
Very good! Just a short question: does your
On 01.07.2019 18:21, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Jul 1, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
Very good! Just a short question: does your solution allow one overload without
array indexes? It is very useful as a for-in enumerator of the array property:
TTest = class
public
// ...
Hi,
did you find the time to review the patch in the issue (
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35691 ) ?
IMHO, as I used it quite some time now, it does what it claims :) ...
regards,
--
Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 01.07.2019 15:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
Yes, I’ve made a patch to allow overriding the actual property
(https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35772).
Very good! Just a short question: does your solution allow one overload
without array indexes?
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
>
> Very good! Just a short question: does your solution allow one overload
> without array indexes? It is very useful as a for-in enumerator of the array
> property:
>
> TTest = class
> public
> // ...
> property
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:38:31 -0400
Ryan Joseph wrote:
> > On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Ondrej Pokorny
> > wrote:
> >
> > type
> > TValue = record A: Integer end;
> > TMyClass = class
> > function GetValue(index: integer): TValue;
> > function GetValue(index: string): TValue;
> >
On 01.07.2019 15:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
Yes, I’ve made a patch to allow overriding the actual property
(https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35772).
Very good! Just a short question: does your solution allow one overload
without array indexes? It is very useful as a for-in enumerator of
On 01.07.2019 17:38, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
type
TValue = record A: Integer end;
TMyClass = class
function GetValue(index: integer): TValue;
function GetValue(index: string): TValue;
property Index[aindex: integer]: TValue read
Thank you Michael for the response. I'll check what headers INDY sends.
Ondrej
On 01.07.2019 14:57, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I tested:
If I run a strace, it just hangs on the read operation:
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80),
sin_addr=inet_addr("128.30.52.100")}, 16) =
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
>
> type
> TValue = record A: Integer end;
> TMyClass = class
> function GetValue(index: integer): TValue;
> function GetValue(index: string): TValue;
> property Index[aindex: integer]: TValue read GetValue; default;
> end;
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
>
> Properties do allow overloading of the parameters.
>
> You only must not declare the overloaded properties but declare overloaded
> getters/setters. The compiler will silently accept them.
>
>
On 7/1/19 8:10 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
Fails with exception:
EHTTPClient
Error reading data from socket
#0 fpc_raiseexception(0x145fb14, 0x0, 0x) at ..\inc\except.inc:158
#1 FILLBUFFER(0x145fb14) at fcl-web\src\base\fphttpclient.pp:731
#2 READSTRING(0x15e1c30, 0x0) at
I tested:
If I run a strace, it just hangs on the read operation:
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80),
sin_addr=inet_addr("128.30.52.100")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in
progress)
select(4, NULL, [3], NULL, {tv_sec=3, tv_usec=0}) = 1 (out [3], left {tv_sec=2,
On 20.06.2019 19:57, Ryan Joseph wrote:
I just had some plans for a cool JSON class thwarted because apparently []
properties don’t allow overloading of the parameters. Can we allow multiple
default properties as long as their parameters are different?
Properties do allow overloading of the
Hello,
I cannot download
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd
with TFPHTTPClient. Delphi INDY downloads it just fine. Does anybody
know what I am missing?
Test code:
program Project1;
uses Classes, SysUtils, fphttpclient;
procedure DownloadFile(const
24 matches
Mail list logo
