On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel wrote:
On Dec 11, 2019, at 4:16 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
It does gain something: it tells you it is NOT a varargs, but an array of
const, which is a different beast altogether.
But it's a syntax equivalent for "a variable amount of
Am 12.12.2019 um 00:34 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
That's true. Given I specialise in optimisation, I've started to
venture towards the node level to see where improvements can be made.
One question I do have in that regard... are platform-specific nodes
allowed? What I mean is, for example,
Am 11.12.2019 um 23:40 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel:
On Dec 11, 2019, at 4:16 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
It does gain something: it tells you it is NOT a varargs, but an array of
const, which is a different beast altogether.
But it's a syntax equivalent for "a variable amount of
That's true. Given I specialise in optimisation, I've started to
venture towards the node level to see where improvements can be made.
One question I do have in that regard... are platform-specific nodes
allowed? What I mean is, for example, a node's 'simplify' routine may
transmute a set of
Am 05.12.2019 um 13:48 schrieb bla...@blaise.ru:
1) Currently, the following snippet
vmtbuilder:=TVMTBuilder.Create(...);
vmtbuilder.generate_vmt;
vmtbuilder.free;
is present @
types_dec :objectdef
generate_specialization_phase2 :objectdef
jvm_maybe_create_enum_class
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 4:16 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
> It does gain something: it tells you it is NOT a varargs, but an array of
> const, which is a different beast altogether.
But it's a syntax equivalent for "a variable amount of arguments", i.e.
varargs. ;) I guess others don't
Am 09.12.2019 um 01:03 schrieb bla...@blaise.ru:
On 08.12.2019 22:30, Sven Barth wrote:
there is no official way to access such parameters
1) At the time of providing that answer on Stack Overflow, Barry Kelly
worked as a DCC developer. While it is not truly official, it is
pretty close,
Am 11.12.2019 um 07:26 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering... is there an intrinsic in Free Pascal that swaps the
pointers stored in two object or pointer variables? That is...
something like "procedure SwapAddresses(var Obj1: TObject; var Obj2:
TObject);" so after it is
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel wrote:
On Dec 10, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel
wrote:
From the view of the *caller* you are mostly right. Though the square brackets
can't be left away, cause we're talking about an array parameter here. If it
would be
> On Dec 10, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> From the view of the *caller* you are mostly right. Though the square
> brackets can't be left away, cause we're talking about an array parameter
> here. If it would be allowed for array of const then it would also need to
Of course, I briefly forgot that UsedRegs and TmpUsedRegs aren't
objects, but arrays of objects - the same principle still applies though
to their members.
On 11/12/2019 06:26, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering... is there an intrinsic in Free Pascal that swaps the
11 matches
Mail list logo
