Regarding the FPC 3.0 what's new language features, I think there is are
more new than what's listed on the wiki. Off the top of my head here two
language features not present in 2.6.4:
* Helpers now work on intrinsic types such as string and integer (eg.
StringHelper = record helper for string)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <luizameri...@gmail.com>
Verzonden: zo 30-08-2015 19:56
Onderwerp: Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
Aan:FPC developers' list <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>;
> Em 30/08/2015 12:43, "Marc
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <luizameri...@gmail.com>
Verzonden: zo 30-08-2015 19:56
Onderwerp: Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
Aan: FPC developers' list <fpc-devel@lists.freep
On 30/08/15 11:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30/08/15 09:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Adding a new package is really not done between a release candidate and
the final release. And merging it can always introduce a new build or
packaging
On 30/08/15 09:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Any specific reason why packages/googleapi is absent from 3.0?
None specific. It was simply committed to SVN after the branch was made.
In theory, there should be no danger to include
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30/08/15 09:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Any specific reason why packages/googleapi is absent from 3.0?
None specific. It was simply committed to SVN after the branch was made.
In
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
2015-08-25 12:50 GMT-03:00 Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl:
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by
On 29/08/15 11:16, John Marino wrote:
Hi, I'm retesting an diffset to put FPC 3.0 in FreeBSD ports. I notice
the file is named 3.0.0-rc1 with a similar tag in github's svn mirror,
but when I build it, the version is listed as 3.0.1
The version number in the tagged svn version is definitely
On 8/29/2015 11:31 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29/08/15 11:16, John Marino wrote:
Hi, I'm retesting an diffset to put FPC 3.0 in FreeBSD ports. I notice
the file is named 3.0.0-rc1 with a similar tag in github's svn mirror,
but when I build it, the version is listed as 3.0.1
The version
On 8/25/2015 5:50 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl:
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_3.0.0
I have created short report in mentioned wiki
Am 28.08.2015 10:56 schrieb Maciej Izak hnb.c...@gmail.com:
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl:
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl:
A preview of the 3.0.0 docs is available at
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/
Small bug in documentation for
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl:
A preview of the 3.0.0 docs is available at
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/
Small bug in documentation for
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/rtl/system/finalizearray.html
in description is described
On Thu, August 27, 2015 15:03, Frank Grotelueschen wrote:
At 10:42 26.08.2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
..
Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they
are no longer
formally supported and tested afaik.
Question is: if the
At 10:42 26.08.2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
..
Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they
are no longer
formally supported and tested afaik.
Question is: if the first is the target system and the latter the host
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Thu, August 27, 2015 15:03, Frank Grotelueschen wrote:
Please don't stop support for W2K. It was the first 'full useable' Windows
based on NT-Kernel and is still used today.
I don't think that the Win32 target maintainers would want to break
working under W2K on
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
I still have a few NT4 app servers, and a very small number of W2K systems.
Possession That's not the important question, rather how much new software
do you develop for those?
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
I still have a few NT4 app servers, and a very small number of W2K systems.
Possession That's not the important question, rather how much new software
do you develop for those?
I'd not expect to ship anything
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:50:50 +0400, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl
wrote:
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
This bugs is unworthy to be released in 3.0 :)
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27349
In our previous episode, LacaK said:
i386, x86_64, PowerPC or Sparc processor
Win32:
- MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported
in FPC officially any longer).
But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded.
I think, that at first place it should be also
Am 26.08.2015 08:36 schrieb Kazantsev Alexey kazantsev.ale...@mail.ru:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:50:50 +0400, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl
wrote:
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
This bugs is unworthy to be released
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said:
Win32:
- MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported
in FPC officially any longer).
But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded.
I think, that at first place it should be also excluded.
Yup, and remove
Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, LacaK said:
i386, x86_64, PowerPC or Sparc processor
Win32:
- MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported
in FPC officially any longer).
But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded.
I
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_3.0.0
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you
News and changes related to this release are described in whatsnew.txt.
Free Pascal 3.0.0 is currently available for the following platforms:
- Linux-i386
- Linux-x86_64 (amd64)
- Linux-powerpc
- Linux-sparc
- Linux-ARM
- Win32-i386 (Win95/98/Me/XP/2000/2003/Vista/7 and WinNT)
Here is
Am 25.08.2015 18:02 schrieb silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com:
Wow!
This is the best news in this year!
\o/\o/\o/ Congratulations! \o/\o/\o/
It's /only/ the release candidate, you know?
Also: did you really have to quote the whole mail? (I mean one can
definitely argue about the acceptable
28 matches
Mail list logo
