On 01 Sep 2011, at 19:21, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 03:50, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> On 01 Sep 2011, at 18:42, Alexander Klenin wrote:
>>
>>> This leaves the first point, however. Why is it prohibited at all?
>>
>> I think because class properties have several limitation
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 03:50, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 01 Sep 2011, at 18:42, Alexander Klenin wrote:
>
>> This leaves the first point, however. Why is it prohibited at all?
>
> I think because class properties have several limitations that normal
> properties do not have:
> http://docwiki.emba
On 01 Sep 2011, at 18:42, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> This leaves the first point, however. Why is it prohibited at all?
I think because class properties have several limitations that normal
properties do not have:
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/en/Properties#Class_Properties
Jonas__
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 03:01, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Am 01.09.2011 17:48, schrieb Alexander Klenin:
>> First, I do not see a reason why normal property can not be
>> implemented by static field.
>> Second, even is such a reason is provided, compiler should error out
>> instead of generating bog
On 01 Sep 2011, at 18:01, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Am 01.09.2011 17:48, schrieb Alexander Klenin:
>> [Is there any method to either comment on or re-open resolved isses?
>> It is very frustrating to be forced to switch comminication channel]
Only the submitter and people with "developer" access
Am 01.09.2011 17:48, schrieb Alexander Klenin:
> [Is there any method to either comment on or re-open resolved isses?
> It is very frustrating to be forced to switch comminication channel]
>
> I think this issue is resolved prematurely.
> First, I do not see a reason why normal property can not be
[Is there any method to either comment on or re-open resolved isses?
It is very frustrating to be forced to switch comminication channel]
I think this issue is resolved prematurely.
First, I do not see a reason why normal property can not be
implemented by static field.
Second, even is such a reas
