I admit I do wonder how hard maintenance will be. True, there is some
more looking ahead, but it's not really any more complex than what it is
already (e.g. take a look at OptPass1MOV in the trunk).
When it comes to debugging the peephole optimiser, one thing I did was
write a function that
Aw, okay. Well, post peephole is still a separate stage, since that
prevents a lot of other optimisations (e.g. changing mov 0,%reg into xor
%reg,%reg).
I'll start breaking it up into smaller chunks.
Gareth aka. Kit
On Sat 01/12/18 19:54 , Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org sent:
Am
Am 01.12.2018 um 17:28 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
> Thanks Bart,
>
> I managed to get it to build after reinstalling the FPC compiler 3.0.4 - it
> seems it was getting confused between two
> different versions on my virtual machine - but after all that it does look
> like a bug in my new code.
Thanks Bart,
I managed to get it to build after reinstalling the FPC compiler 3.0.4 -
it seems it was getting confused between two different versions on my
virtual machine - but after all that it does look like a bug in my new
code. I've managed to get it to compile from a clean build and with
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:41 PM J. Gareth Moreton
wrote:
> /usr/bin/diff ppc3 ppcx64
> Binary files ppc3 and ppcx64 differ
>
> And then it drops out. I've tried the usual things of doing a "make
> distclean", but am I missing something obvious? Preliminary Linux testing is
> the only thing
I must have something configured incorrectly - I'm still getting the
error. Apologies for bugging everyone.
Gareth aka. Kit
On Sat 01/12/18 06:14 , "Christo Crause" christo.cra...@gmail.com sent:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, 01:37 J. Gareth Moreton ___
The only thing I've managed to run so far
is the standard "make all". What's
mysterious though is that if I grab a
clean copy from the trunk, it builds fine.
However, if I do "make clean" first, that
error appears. Does anyone else get this?
(I'm using Ubuntu and compiling on x86_64)
I
Am 30.11.2018 um 14:39 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a little question. I'm having problems compiling fpc under
> x86_64-linux. At first I thought it was a bug in one
> of my changes, but it seems to occur on the trunk as well. After
> successfully compiling the
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, 01:37 J. Gareth Moreton Actually still having lots of problems here. Can anyone give me some
> advice? Admittedly my skills with Linux are lacking, but I would like to
> get it to build on x86_64-linux before I submit my patch to everyone.
>
> What I've discovered so far is
Actually still having lots of problems here. Can anyone give me some
advice? Admittedly my skills with Linux are lacking, but I would like to
get it to build on x86_64-linux before I submit my patch to everyone.
What I've discovered so far is that if I pull a clean copy from the SVN
trunk, it
Never mind. Got it working after I got a clean copy ("svn update" then
"svn revert -R .") - now the adventure continues!
Gareth aka. Kit
On Fri 30/11/18 13:39 , "J. Gareth Moreton" gar...@moreton-family.com
sent:
Hi everyone,
I have a little question. I'm having problems compiling fpc
Hi everyone,
I have a little question. I'm having problems compiling fpc under
x86_64-linux. At first I thought it was a bug in one of my changes, but
it seems to occur on the trunk as well. After successfully compiling the
compiler a few times, the following happens:
/usr/bin/diff ppc3
12 matches
Mail list logo
