Alexander schrieb:
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check
because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
My current computer is PII. 350MHz 128 RAM 40G HDD
It work !
Free soft inteneded for save old computers.
Linux kernel can run on 386 CPU and
On Friday 13 July 2007 08.54, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Alexander schrieb:
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check
because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
My current computer is PII. 350MHz 128 RAM 40G HDD
It work !
Free soft inteneded
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check
because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
My current computer is PII. 350MHz 128 RAM 40G HDD
It work !
Free soft inteneded for save old computers.
Linux kernel can run on 386 CPU and support MFM HDD.
FPC
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check
because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
My current computer is PII. 350MHz 128 RAM 40G HDD
It work !
Free soft inteneded for save old computers.
Linux kernel can run on 386 CPU and support MFM HDD.
FPC
Sergei Gorelkin schrieb:
Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 12:06:51 AM, Florian wrote:
FK Vinzent Hoefler schrieb:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 09:58, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:40, Yury Sidorov wrote:
Maybe other way to detect SSE support exists...
CPUID?
To be more precise,
Yury Sidorov wrote:
CPU supports it. But CPU support doesn't mean OS support. And to check
if the OS supports SSE you've to execute an sse instruction and handle
the exception.
Florian, to prevent SIGILL on non SSE CPUs we can first check CPUID and
execute sse instruction only if CPUID
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
Yury Sidorov wrote:
CPU supports it. But CPU support doesn't mean OS support. And to check
if the OS supports SSE you've to execute an sse instruction and handle
the exception.
Florian, to prevent SIGILL on non SSE CPUs we can first check CPUID
and execute sse
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08.39, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check because I
didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
A PII with 256MB ram is my main development machine. Do you see why
MSEide+MSEgui is so fast? ;-)
From
Vinzent Hoefler schrieb:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 06:39, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check
because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :)
Well, if the OS supports SSE and thus no SIGILL is generated, what would
be
Hi,
Every program compiled with fixes_2_2 rev. 8006 crashes
in gdb:
GNU gdb 6.6
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show
- Original Message -
From: Martin Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 pm
Subject: [fpc-devel] win32 debugging broken in fixes_2_2?
Hi,
Every program compiled with fixes_2_2 rev. 8006 crashes
in gdb:
GNU gdb 6.6
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation
On 10 Jul 2007, at 14:38, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Every program compiled with fixes_2_2 rev. 8006 crashes
in gdb:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
0x00402091 in SYSTEM_FPC_CPUCODEINIT ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00402091 in SYSTEM_FPC_CPUCODEINIT ()
#1 0x0040a504 in SYSTEM_init ()
From: Martin Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Every program compiled with fixes_2_2 rev. 8006 crashes
in gdb:
GNU gdb 6.6
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:40, Yury Sidorov wrote:
Maybe other way to detect SSE support exists...
CPUID?
Vinzent.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 09:58, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:40, Yury Sidorov wrote:
Maybe other way to detect SSE support exists...
CPUID?
To be more precise, the way recommended by Intel:
To make this check, execute the CPUID instruction with an argument of 1
in the
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14.53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what should I do in MSEide? Disable SIGILL reporting by gdb?
How does Lazarus handle the problem?
It does not handle it. If you handle it in MSEIDE, please let us know how
you did it.
The IDE must check where the SIGILL is
On 10 Jul 2007, at 15:11, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Question to the FPC developers:
Is there really no other method to check for SSE support?
According to the comments of Florian in the code, there is no other
way which works everywhere.
Jonas
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15.13, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 10 Jul 2007, at 15:11, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Question to the FPC developers:
Is there really no other method to check for SSE support?
According to the comments of Florian in the code, there is no other
way which works everywhere.
Are
18 matches
Mail list logo
