On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:16:53PM +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a linux unit with epoll system call wrappers. Also a demo is
included that creates 100 pipes and writes a character to each and reads it
non-blockingly.
Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in
Attached is a linux unit with epoll system call wrappers. Also a demo is
included that creates 100 pipes and writes a character to each and reads it
non-blockingly.
Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in rtl/linux/arch
from a newer version of the kernel ? It's probably
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in rtl/linux/arch
from a newer version of the kernel ? It's probably less work than me
trying to split all the syscall numbers up and you copy pasting them
for each arch
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in
rtl/linux/arch
from a newer version of the kernel ? It's probably less work than me
trying to split all the syscall numbers up and you copy pasting them
for each
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
First sb who is more into practical aspects of the Linux kernel should say
which kernel we are targeting.
Defining the syscall numbers is independent of choosing the target linux
kernel, right ?
It should. But
Try 2...
---BeginMessage---
This is an update kqueue and a sendfile support for freeBSD with example.
Kqueue will run on all BSDs (I've added other syscall_nrs for it) but
sendfile is specific to FreeBSD.
Ales
kqueue_sendfile.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
---End Message---
On 3 feb 2006, at 12:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I think most will have a 2.6 kernel by now, except for people running
odd architectures with lazy kernel maintainers.
IIRC FC4 comes standard with at least 2.4 as choice. Don't
underestimate
peopl that run under standard circumstances.
Any one call a webservice (WSDL) from Freepascal. I did it using Delphi,
but now i want to do it by freepascal/Lazarus.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Has something changed on the SVN repository? For the last week I
cannot get updates from SVN for FPC or Lazarus. I was using svn
command line client ver.1.2.3
I just saw a new version of SVN was released, so thought that was the
problem, so upgraded to ver.1.3.0 and
I can access all other repositories without error.
Repositories I tested:
Apache svn - no problems
TechInsite running apache on Windows - no problems
FPC and Lazarus - error mentioned below.
All the above repositories run via HTTP using apache.
I did a Google search and found similar reports
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I can access all other repositories without error.
Repositories I tested:
Apache svn - no problems
TechInsite running apache on Windows - no problems
FPC and Lazarus - error mentioned below.
All the above repositories run via HTTP using apache.
I did a Google search
On 2/3/06, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already did a checkout just to test this for you.
Umm... Thanks for the test. Back to Googling
Graeme.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Does svn client create a logfile somewhere that could possibly give me
more hints as to what is going wrong?
Graeme.
On 2/3/06, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I can access all other repositories without error.
Repositories I tested:
Apache svn -
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:36:47PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Defining the syscall numbers is independent of choosing the target linux
kernel, right ?
It should. But sometimes call names are changed to _old and new ones with
the same name appear (with e.g. rt_ prefixed).
So I'm
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know,
go to http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
What do you think?
Ales
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ales Katona wrote:
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know, go to
http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ales Katona wrote:
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know,
go to
http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why prefix everything with fp ?
To have a common prefix that shows it is part of
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Peter Vreman wrote:
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why prefix everything with fp ?
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:41:49 +0100
Ales Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try 2...
And almost the same sendfile support for linux. Uses the 64bit sendfile
syscall per default.
Micha
sendfile-linux.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
___
fpc-devel
I'll be honest to say that I don't care much if it's in FCL or
Packages/Bare or Extra but the fp is not going to happen.
Names are already done and they are used, I can't rename the API.
Ales
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On 2/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Packages are not necessarily class based, are often simple imports of
libraries and so on; not the place for VCL/CLX counterparts.
I don't want to get into the fp discussion, but I think that many
things on FCL are not the counter-part of
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why prefix everything with fp ?
I think it will be more obvious as to why it is
23 matches
Mail list logo
