I don't think, full UTF-16 really would be desirable desirable over UC-2.
Imagine you have a string of some million characters (e.g. a Book). All
functions that need to find the n-th character (like x[n], copy, ...)
would take forever, as they need to scan the complete string (if not
widest
The encoding can be important for speed:
For example the widestring xml parser is up to 10 times slower than
the ansistring xml parser.
That obviously is the reason why Turbo - Delphi uses UCS-2 (16 bit)
instead of OF UTF-8 or UTF-16 for WideStrings (and WideChar is a 16 bit
(UCS-2) value).
s[i]:='x' doesn't work in UTF-8, nor UTF-16, nor UTF-32.
It would work, but it would need an implementation that moves the tail
of the string around and thus would be really slow.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Am Montag, 29. September 2008 09:25 schrieb Michael Schnell:
> > The encoding can be important for speed:
> > For example the widestring xml parser is up to 10 times slower than
> > the ansistring xml parser.
>
> That obviously is the reason why Turbo - Delphi uses UCS-2 (16 bit)
> instead of OF UT
That obviously is the reason why Turbo - Delphi uses UCS-2 (16 bit)
instead of OF UTF-8 or UTF-16 for WideStrings (and WideChar is a 16
bit (UCS-2) value).
You didn't read http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=30 , did you?
They are talking about Delphi 2009, of which I don't have any
infor
Michael Schnell schrieb:
>
>> The encoding can be important for speed:
>> For example the widestring xml parser is up to 10 times slower than
>> the ansistring xml parser.
>>
> That obviously is the reason why Turbo - Delphi uses UCS-2 (16 bit)
> instead of OF UTF-8 or UTF-16 for WideStrings (an
Hi.
Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
Other hints I want to see, but this is by my opinion useless and only
makes dirty compiler output. I cannot effectively suppres it in my code.
For examle:
procedure TObj.OnEvent(Sender: TObject);
Sometimes I need S
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
No. People regularly ask for the ability to disable particular hints/
warnings, but no one is interested enough to submit a patch to add
such functionality to th
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
> Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
I agree, it would be nice to suppress that hint! It's quite pointless,
99% of the time.
I have seen some code like the following, to suppress that hint
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
No. People regularly ask for the ability to disable particular
hints/warnings, but no one is interested enough to submit a patch to add
such f
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
I agree, it would be nice to suppress that hint! It's quite pointless,
99% of the time.
For this particular hint with Sender
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:31, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
No. People regularly ask for the ability to disable particular
hints/warnings, but no one is inte
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:31, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any posibility to hide compiler hint:
Hint: Parameter "xxx" not used
No. People regularly ask for the ability to disable particular
hints/warnings,
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:41, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe пишет:
That's just a hack, and you have to regenerate the message file for
every new FPC release.
Ofcource, but what can we do simple fpc users ;)
Submit a patch. The message handling code really isn't rocket science.
It's pretty
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Florian Klaempfl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try to repeat the static keyword in the body, this could work with 2.2.0
> too.
That was the first thing I tryed:
controller.pas(85,97) Error: Procedure directive "STATIC" not allowed
in implementation section
with fp
are you sure they are using UCS2 and not some 16bit codepages? That
exists also ;)
Not really.
I checked the unicodes 0x0100 and 0x0101 (capital and lower case "A"
with a dash). Same can correctly be viewed in the debugger when pointing
to the WideString variable. So I guess it indeed is un
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:41, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>
>> Jonas Maebe ??:
>>> That's just a hack, and you have to regenerate the message file for every
>>> new FPC release.
>>
>> Ofcource, but what can we do simple fpc users ;)
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
