Yakov Sudeikin wrote:
I would really appreciate some comments on my question about patches
that would implement "optional", "unofficial" or "pluggable" features.
I would like very much to be able to build extensions for particular
idioms. I understand that not everybody will like this possibility.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Absence of automatic construction/destruction of
classes is very painfull and it can significantly
degrade the
development process (i.e. smart pointers and RAII are
impossible). It's one of the greatest flaws of Pascal
relatevly to
C (the second thing are Templ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send fpc-devel mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTE
