[fpc-devel] Linux loadlibrary vs Windows
I use the Synapse TCP toolkit. I recently updated to 2.0.2 (can't get a
full working 2.0.3 in Windows yet for some reason) and found that
Synapse suddenly didn't compile in Linux.
Now, it's likely that the Synapse toolkit has already been updated, but
my point is the difference now between Linux and Windows. Previously
the same code worked, but now you have to remove the pointer(*) typecast
from Linux, but it still had to be there for Windows.
Was this intentional? Both compilers (Linux and Win32) are running
2.0.2 now.
Here's what I had to do to the Synapse toolkit:
function FreeLibrary(Module: HMODULE): LongBool;
begin
{$ifdef linux}
Result := dynlibs.UnloadLibrary(Module);
{$else}
Result := dynlibs.UnloadLibrary(pointer(Module));
{$endif}
end;
function GetProcAddress(Module: HMODULE; Proc: PChar): Pointer;
begin
{$ifdef linux}
Result := dynlibs.GetProcedureAddress(Module, Proc);
{$else}
Result := dynlibs.GetProcedureAddress(pointer(Module), Proc);
{$endif}
end;
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Stop the download HORROR
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Hello, The Lazarus installer comes with Free Pascal, so you only need to do one download to get both. It's located here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=89339 If you don't want Lazarus and you only want the Free Pascal Compiler, then you need to go to Free Pascal website. The website is here: www.freepascal.org/ The compiler download is here: http://www.freepascal.org/down/i386/win32.html Also if you want the latest svn snapshot from last night, you can download the installer from the USA mirror at http://lazarus.maro.net/ -Tony Maro ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] using sockets on linux and win32
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: Hi, im trying to use sockets in a unit which should work on linux and win32. I use the sockets unit, but for things like SOL_SOCKET, TTimeval (for setsockopt), SO_RCVTIMEO, fpgeterrno I finally had to use unix,unixtype,baseunix. This on Linux. Now I try to compile it on windows: It seems I need SocketError and not fpgeterrno ( there is a thread about that some days old ). But where do I find SOL_SOCKET for windows? using winsock did not help. I searched for a good example using google, searched the fpc docs... there seems to be a lot of outdated information. And now the question: Has someone an uses-clause compatible with linux and windows for an app really using sockets and not only for a simple hello socket? thank you kisda I'd recommend Synapse tools. They're blocking only, but I have used them extensively. They even support HTTP file transfers and SSL. But, I'm not too up on what the latest sockets development in FPC has been, perhaps there's something better now. -Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] How to get contents of TDOMNode.NodeValue ???
Alexander Todorov wrote:
document
messageHello word/message
/document
I did :
ShowMessage(Document.FindNode('message').NodeValue)
but it returns an empty string. Showing NodeName returns 'message'.
How to get the contents of the message tag Is it working ?
The real problem is that the computer recognized that it is NOT a true
Hello World message (word, not world) and it refused to display due to
the typo ;-) just kidding.
As I recall, there's another child node in the object heiarchy when you
have text between the tags. It's a #text subnode to the message
node. Someone with more experience in that can expound.
If you use Lazarus, my TMPack has a XML Treeview component that loads an
XML file into a TTreeView for visual display. It might you help
visualize what's going on better. I've attached a tiny screenshot based
on your example XML data.
http://tony.maro.net/mod.php?mod=downloadsop=showcatid=2level=1
Also if we have
tag
inner_tag
.
inner_tag
.
/tag
will NodeValue return the string between the tag tag
No, it returns nothing, and you'll have to look for child nodes to the
tag to find inner_tag.
The main problem is that you are thinking of an XML file as a text file,
when in fact it's a string of interconnected objects. It's kind of like
thinking of a .frm file textually (Is that a word) because it's stored
as a text file, when in fact it's a represenation of objects that make
up a form.
-Tony
attachment: xmlview.jpg
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] FindFirst broken due to ExpandFileName bug?
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: This is a snapshot compiler, please use the official compiler if you can. If you use snapshots, use only the latest possible. The development compiler is not guaranteed bug free, as you can see. The current development compiler has no problem with your code, so that is the one you should use... The fixbranch compiler also no longer has the problem: home: compiler/ppc386 -l -Furtl/units/i386-linux ~/testp Free Pascal Compiler version 2.0.1 [2005/09/02] for i386 Copyright (c) 1993-2005 by Florian Klaempfl home: ~/testp /home/michael/ Maybe you can update that one (not to the 2.1.1 branch) Thanks - I guess then that confirms that it _was_ an issue (which is why I posted this here rather than run do a bug report.) I forget exactly why I ended up grabbing the snapshot that day, but there was some reason I'm sure. I'm not one to update unless I have to or I get several months behind ;-) -Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] FindFirst broken due to ExpandFileName bug?
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Tony Maro wrote:
I just tried to use FindFirst to get a listing of files in a directory. I
passed FindFirst the following:
if FindFirst('/home/tony/test/*',faAnyFile, Res) 0 then begin
It never would return any results. Then I noticed that FindFirst calls:
GlobSearchRec^.Path:=ExpandFileName(ExtractFilePath(Path));
So I ran:
ExpandFileName(ExtractFilePath('/home/tony/test/*'));
And I got:
/home/tony/LazarusFiles/testapp//home/tony/test/
Do you still have this bug ?
The most recent compiler/rtl gives the following, which is IMHO correct:
I'm running:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.0.1 [2005/07/20] for i386
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?
Joost van der Sluis wrote: I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer allows reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just reverts the cell back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will let the change save (and I'm not sure why it's not consistent.) I'm assuming this might be related to the recent db subsystem changes? Is that fpc-related or lazarus-related? (ie: does it work with fpc 2.0.0?) Several people including myself reported this, but Jesus Reyes can't reproduce it. (If it's fpc-related, i'll have a look at it) I'm not sure to be honest with you. You can't compile the latest Lazarus CVS with FPC 2.0.0, and the problem doesn't exist in my 2.0.0 FPC + older Lazarus. It was introduced on my PC when I upgraded my FPC to 2.0.1 so I could update my Lazarus... - meaning I updated both then found the problem, so I don't know which causes it. I was assuming that if the TDataSet components were changed recently that it might be the cause... I'll see if I can't make an already-compiled demonstration app and send it to Jesus Reyes so he can see it happen. Thanks, Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote: Can someone confirm the date issue for me? I can't confirm it, but I do want to mention that I fixed all datetime-related routines for *nix platforms in sysutils a while ago. They operated based on the supposition that the dates they get are in Windows format, as opposed to the number of seconds since x/x/1970. Maybe some databases always store the date in Windows format and maybe some database units counted on this bug... I wouldn't think so in this case - it's not just returning the wrong date, it's always returning the SAME wrong date, regardless of the value in the database table. But I won't rule it out as a possibility. I'll point Micha to this thread. -Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote: Can someone confirm the date issue for me? I can't confirm it, but I do want to mention that I fixed all datetime-related routines for *nix platforms in sysutils a while ago. They operated based on the supposition that the dates they get are in Windows format, as opposed to the number of seconds since x/x/1970. I have a concern on that - and please keep in mind I've not even looked at the code, so I don't know if it's an issue or not. My main purpose in using FPC is to write cross-platform applications. From what I gather, I'll now need to understand that TDateTime doesn't actually store things the same way on different OS's? I know, FPC's goal is not specifically Delphi compatibility, but... Here's a quote I found online: In Delphi for Win32 (and Kylix), TDateTime is defined as a Double (64-bit floating-point number). Date and time information is stored as the count of days since midnight on 30-Dec-1899. Here you can see that even Kylix uses the same methodology in storing TDateTime values. I can see both perspectives, but if the idea is to make it easier to develop cross-platform software, I'd expect TDateTime to be stored the same way across platforms regardless of how the OS counts. A lot of software written for Delphi is going to be awfully hard to convert for Linux, Mac, etc if TDateTime is stored differently everywhere. -Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
RE: [fpc-devel] David Intersimone Interview about Freepascal andLazarus!!!
Well, he does not say anything about the project specifically, just that Borland is committed to Delphi, surprise, surprise :-) Micha Actually, when asked if Lazarus, FPC, etc are competitors to Delphi he says: I think they're just other languages or other projects for people to take a look at. I.E. Yes, it's called competition. He's also afraid to admit that FPC + Laz actually IS the same language as Delphi and tries to make people believe it's not the same language... It's NOT the same IDE, but it IS the same LANGUAGE. -Tony -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.5.2 - Release Date: 6/3/2005 ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] First benchmark of Abbrevia 4.0
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:29 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, DrDiettrich wrote: A friend of mine just has tested my archiver, with the following results for an TAR with a million of files: PowerArchiver: 530 minutes. My Unarch: 160 minutes. Huh ? Who creates archives with million of files ? Who creates a million of files in the first place ?! Any microsoft app seems to... I mean, OOo is what, a few hundred MB while equivalent MS is gigs+ If we are to be truly cross-platform we must be prepared for cross-platform bloat as well. ;-) ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] webserver
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:56 +0400, Alexey Barkovoy wrote: But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ? Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now (maybe even more). Sometimes it's just reappears - last time it's happened in sunday - I've succesfully filed bug report and downloaded sources from CVS. But next day it again disappeared. And now not reachable either throw www.freepascal.org or 62.166.198.202. I hate being a me to or not me, but it works fine from here (WV, USA). Web responds quickly, however last week I did notice some slowdowns. Here's a traceroute: traceroute to www.freepascal.org (62.166.198.202), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0.726 ms 0.674 ms 0.698 ms 2 L200.DSL-RTR1.CHAR.verizon-gni.net (151.205.95.1) 27.748 ms 27.505 ms 27.541 ms 3 130.81.12.89 (130.81.12.89) 27.846 ms 27.932 ms 27.801 ms 4 so-2-2-1-0.BB-RTR1.PHIL.verizon-gni.net (130.81.18.30) 45.182 ms 45.109 ms 44.786 ms 5 so-1-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.PHIL.verizon-gni.net (130.81.7.226) 43.275 ms 43.577 ms 43.098 ms 6 dca-edge-03.inet.qwest.net (65.118.218.45) 46.026 ms 46.443 ms 47.013 ms 7 dca-core-02.inet.qwest.net (205.171.9.61) 46.072 ms 46.209 ms 46.054 ms 8 dca-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.9.54) 46.780 ms 45.944 ms 46.029 ms 9 so0-1-0-622M.ar3.wdc2.gblx.net (208.51.74.9) 46.059 ms 46.696 ms 46.026 ms 10 so0-0-0-2488M.ar3.AMS2.gblx.net (67.17.73.86) 129.326 ms 128.660 ms 128.834 ms 11 Versatel-Nederland.so-3-0-0.ar3.AMS2.gblx.net (64.211.166.182) 131.008 ms Versatel-Nederland.so-2-0-0.ar3.AMS2.gblx.net (64.212.109.2) 130.687 ms Versatel-Nederland.so-3-0-0.ar3.AMS2.gblx.net (64.211.166.182) 130.895 ms 12 62.58.126.196 (62.58.126.196) 134.834 ms 134.170 ms 133.728 ms 13 unlabelled.versatel.net (62.58.126.46) 134.015 ms 135.156 ms 133.503 ms 14 cust198-193.dsl.versadsl.be (62.166.198.193) 138.201 ms 138.953 ms 138.834 ms 15 cust198-202.dsl.versadsl.be (62.166.198.202) 138.213 ms 139.142 ms 138.955 ms ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] Unhandled Exception if CTRL-C pressed.... hehe
Just installed CVS and I always verify the correct version is being run by just running the compiler at the console without arguments to check the version number, then CTRL-C out the first press enter prompt. Check it out: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc]$ fpc Free Pascal Compiler version 1.9.7 [2005/02/13] for i386 Copyright (c) 1993-2005 by Florian Klaempfl /usr/local/lib/fpc/1.9.7/ppc386 [options] inputfile [options] put + after a boolean switch option to enable it, - to disable it -a the compiler doesn't delete the generated assembler file -allist sourcecode lines in assembler file -anlist node info in assembler file -apuse pipes instead of creating temporary assembler files -arlist register allocation/release info in assembler file -atlist temp allocation/release info in assembler file -Ax output format: -Adefault use default assembler -Aas assemble using GNU AS -Anasmcoff coff (Go32v2) file using Nasm -Anasmelf elf32 (Linux) file using Nasm -Anasmwin32Win32 object file using Nasm -AnasmwdosxWin32/WDOSX object file using Nasm -Awasm obj file using Wasm (Watcom) -Anasmobj obj file using Nasm -Amasm obj file using Masm (Microsoft) -Atasm obj file using Tasm (Borland) -Aelf elf32 (Linux) using internal writer *** press enter *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc]$ Error: Compilation aborted An unhandled exception occurred at $0805BB23 : Exception : Ctrl-C Signaled! $0805BB23 $BFFFE77C $080546DE $080575C6 $0805797E $08059410 $08059505 $08081352 $08084AD9 $0805F6E6 $0805F7A5 $08048278 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc]$ -- Thanks, Tony Maro Check out CheckBook Tracker, a free personal finance software for Linux! http://tony.maro.net ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] Mac G3 and FPC
I have a client who wants to give me a G3 laptop for future development work. (yes, I said give - no cost on my part.) I know that FPC has some functionality starting with testing on the G4... I know almost NOTHING about Mac's, so my question is, is the G3 so different from the G4 that I can't expect to run FPC 1.9.x on it within any reasonable timeframe (or ever)? Yes, I know it's initial stages right now, but a long term goal for this project is to compile a Lazarus applictation for Mac - 1 year / 1.5 years away has been discussed Thanks, Tony Maro ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] installing lazarus on linux
Treeve Jelbert wrote: I tried the latest source tarball of lazarus and did 'make' as instructed. everything compiles ok then I did 'make install PREFIX=/usr/share/lazarus' Wrong list - try the lazarus list. However, Lazarus needs no install. Just a make will do it for you. In fact I don't think you CAN install it separate like that because the IDE needs it's full sources handy to work properly. -Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel]FPC CVS breaks Lazarus build within IDE
I just updated my FPC cvs today. My last update was 3 or 4 days ago. I haven't updated Lazarus in a week or so. The latest FPC update breaks building Lazarus from inside the IDE. For those familiar, if you try to install a package, Lazarus will optionally rebuild itself. Now it will either freeze or crash when you try to do this. I tried to get a crash, but lately only got the freeze. Here's the last console out from Lazarus when it stops responding: TPascalParserTool.BuildTree B OnlyIntf=False project1.lpr TMainIDE.DoNewEditorFile end unit1.pas TMainIDE.DoNewProject end [TExternalToolList.Run] /usr/bin/make ide OPT=-Cn Xlib: sequence lost (0x10200 0x5c9a) in reply type 0x10! Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 0x5c9a) in reply type 0x10! I know this isn't a Lazarus list, but like I said, I haven't changed Lazarus code that worked on the CVS from a few days ago, so I assume it's an FPC issue. Building from the console with make works fine. There was some recent discussion about this regarding Win32 building, but this is in Linux that I'm experiencing it. Thanks, Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel]DateSeparator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you can see it is a typed const, which means you can set it to any character you like. To solve your problems, set it to '/' at program startup, and you should be fine. Same for the other constants. Ah... okay. So just a lack of knowledge on my part. Thanks guys, Tony ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel]DateSeparator
The DateSeparator is defined in sysinth.inc as
Const
{ Character to be put between date, month and year }
DateSeparator: char = '-';
{ Format used for short date notation }
ShortDateFormat: string = 'd/m/y';
{ Format used for long date notation }
LongDateFormat: string = 'dd ';
Which means if I try to display something in the standard American
format of mm/dd/yyy using:
FormatDate('mm/dd/',mydate)
I end up with mm-dd-. The / gets replaced with the DateSeparator
constant. Since it's an FPC constant, I can't easily change this.
Basically, this makes every date format function useless for me.
I see a note above it that says use InitInternational to set this, but
that procedure seems to do nothing of the sort.
Can we not change all the defines in sysinth.inc to VAR instead of CONST
so they could be manipulated by the programmer?
-Tony Maro
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel]Access violation with IndexName property of TDbf
Tony Maro wrote: I'm not sure if this is a TDbf issue, or an FPC db issue, so I'm posting both places. I'm using CVS of FPC from about 1 hour ago. Basically, whatever I do, if I try to set the IndexName or IndexFieldNames property of the TDbf I get an access violation. Found it... This only occurs if there are no records yet. Here's why: On or aboutdataset.inc: 1582 If (GetRecord(Fbuffers[FRecordCount-1],gmcurrent,True)grOk) and Think of what happens if there's no records. It passes: GetRecord(FBuffers[-1],... Access Violation. Don't ask me the proper way to fix it though. -Tony Maro ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel]Another TDataSet issue to think about (I think)
I've got a TDbf on a form. I've got a TDataSource attached to it. I've set an event handler on the DataSource.OnDataChanged. When I set the TDbf active, it's triggering an OnDataChanged BEFORE the dataset is fully active. If you do reading of data within the event handler, it results in Operation cannot be performed on an inactive dataset. Wouldn't the dataset already be open to trigger an OnDataChanged? -Tony Maro ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel]Access violation with IndexName property of TDbf
I'm not sure if this is a TDbf issue, or an FPC db issue, so I'm posting
both places. I'm using CVS of FPC from about 1 hour ago.
Basically, whatever I do, if I try to set the IndexName or
IndexFieldNames property of the TDbf I get an access violation.
Here's a sample:
var
MyDbf: TDbf;
begin
MyDbf := TDbf.Create(nil);
MyDbf.FilePath := 'data/';
{ we want to use Visual dBase VII compatible tables }
MyDbf.TableLevel := 7;
MyDbf.Exclusive := True;
MyDbf.TableName := 'customers.dbf';
With MyDbf.FieldDefs do begin
Add('Id', ftAutoInc, 0, True);
Add('Name', ftString, 80, True);
End;
MyDbf.CreateTable;
MyDbf.Open;
MyDbf.AddIndex('custid', 'Id', [ixPrimary, ixUnique]);
MyDbf.AddIndex('custname.ndx','Name', [ixCaseInsensitive]);
MyDbf.Close;
MyDbf.Free;
MessageDlg('Created.', mtInformation,[mbOk],0);
MyDBF := TDBf.Create(nil);
MyDBF.FilePath := 'data/';
MyDBF.TableLevel := 25;
MyDBF.TableName := 'customers.dbf';
MyDBF.Open;
MyDBF.OpenIndexFile('custname.ndx');
MyDBF.IndexName := 'custname';
//MyDBF.IndexFieldNames := 'Name'; // doesn't work either
//MyDBF.IndexName := 'custid'; // doesn't work EITHER...
MyDbf.Close;
end;
And the obligatory backtrace:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/tony/Projects/testcrash/project1
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0806a29c in DBF_TDBF_$__GETRECORD$PCHAR$TGETMODE$BOOLEAN ()
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x0806a29c in DBF_TDBF_$__GETRECORD$PCHAR$TGETMODE$BOOLEAN ()
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x08070de8 in DB_TDATASET_$__RESYNC$TRESYNCMODE ()
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x0806b252 in DBF_TDBF_$__RESYNC$TRESYNCMODE ()
No symbol table info available.
#3 0x0806cf63 in DBF_TDBF_$__SETINDEXNAME$ANSISTRING ()
No symbol table info available.
#4 0x0816dd29 in TFORM1__BUTTON1CLICK (SENDER=0x40440ea8, this=0x4043eae8)
at unit1.pas:59
MYDBF = (TDBF *) 0x4057c014
#5 0x08102158 in TCONTROL__CLICK (this=0x40440ea8) at control.inc:1813
No locals.
#6 0x080d6b25 in TBUTTONCONTROL__CLICK (this=0x40440ea8)
at buttoncontrol.inc:51
No locals.
#7 0x080ca201 in TCUSTOMBUTTON__CLICK (this=0x40440ea8) at buttons.inc:187
FORM = (TCUSTOMFORM *) 0x0
#8 0x080ca220 in TCUSTOMBUTTON__WMDEFAULTCLICKED (MESSAGE=
{MSG = 1031, WPARAM = -1073746528, LPARAM = 26, RESULT =
1075674240, WPARA MLO = 60832, WPARAMHI = 49151, LPARAMLO = 26, LPARAMHI
= 0, RESULTLO = 31872, RE SULTHI = 16413}, this=0x40440ea8) at
buttons.inc:199
No locals.
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
