On Monday 15 May 2006 07.51, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Monday 15 May 2006 07.29, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
How do FPIDE and Lazarus solve the problem?
The IDE retrieves the messages through
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Monday 15 May 2006 07.51, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Monday 15 May 2006 07.29, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
How do FPIDE and Lazarus solve the
On Sun, 14 May 2006 08:48:07 +0200 (CEST)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About flushing the output, I think it is impossible to receive the output
interactively currently, it will output in bursts. You should still be
able to receive the output, though. If you want to receive it
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln.
On linux I can use a pseudo terminal, what can I do on win32 to get flushed
output from FPC into the message window of MSEide?
About flushing the
On Sunday 14 May 2006 08.48, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln.
On linux I can use a pseudo terminal, what can I do on win32 to get
flushed output from FPC into the message window of MSEide?
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 08.48, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln.
On linux I can use a pseudo terminal, what can I do on win32 to get
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln.
On linux I can use a pseudo terminal, what can I do on win32 to get flushed
output from FPC into the message window of
On Sun, 14 May 2006 12:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006,
On Sun, 14 May 2006 11:46:33 +0200
Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef
We could do this ourselves by assigning a unique number to each error.
(and keeping these numbers)
All messages already have an unique number. It is only not used in the output.
Peter
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
Parsing the current error messages isn't that hard?
Perhaps it is even easier than the format I proposed, but it is bad
software design and asking for breakage.
Daniël___
fpc-devel maillist -
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Peter Vreman wrote:
We could do this ourselves by assigning a unique number to each error.
(and keeping these numbers)
All messages already have an unique number. It is only not used in the output.
So, in principle they don't change ?
I seem to remember
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 16.54, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The error numbers didn't change, they are keep unique.
I propose to do the following:
- add an option -vm (machine readable output)
Using this option the compiler outputs the messages csv like and flushes
after
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2006 12:10:14 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm all for such a message form; it should be easy to add with some -v
switch... But
- This is no use if the message code changes over
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The error numbers didn't change, they are keep unique.
I propose to do the following:
- add an option -vm (machine readable output)
Using this option the compiler outputs the messages csv like and flushes
after each message:
message type tab
On Sunday 14 May 2006 17.16, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I need no machine readable output (up to now), I need a way to get
flushed writeln output from the RTL on widows to display it in the MSEide
message window (compiler output) and the target window (program output).
On linux I use a PTY to
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The error numbers didn't change, they are keep unique.
I propose to do the following:
- add an option -vm (machine readable output)
Using this option the compiler outputs the messages csv like and flushes
after each message:
message type
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 17.16, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I need no machine readable output (up to now), I need a way to get
flushed writeln output from the RTL on widows to display it in the MSEide
message window (compiler output) and the target window (program output).
On
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The error numbers didn't change, they are keep unique.
I propose to do the following:
- add an option -vm (machine readable
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Dani?l Mantione wrote:
XML requires an advanced parser and existing parsers will also produce
complicated parser trees. (All that is needed is a sequence of key/value
pairs, XML is a recursive tree). I'm not against it, but I have a light
preference for something
On 14 May 06, at 19:20, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On 14 May 06, at 8:54, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln.
On linux I can use a pseudo terminal,
On Sunday 14 May 2006 20.17, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber wrote:
The problem exists not only for the compiler but for all console
programs. I found no way to display the interactive output in a IDE
window on win32. On Linux I can use a pseudo terminal to get flushed
output
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 20.17, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber wrote:
The problem exists not only for the compiler but for all console
programs. I found no way to display the interactive output in a IDE
window on win32. On Linux
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Monday 15 May 2006 07.29, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 15 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber:
How do FPIDE and Lazarus solve the problem?
The IDE retrieves the messages through the comphook unit.
And the output from a console
Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln.
On linux I can use a pseudo terminal, what can I do on win32 to get flushed
output from FPC into the message window of MSEide?
Martin
___
fpc-devel maillist -
25 matches
Mail list logo
