ied type.
> Effectively telling you if you can do a hard cast of that value to
> that type.
> >
> > I fail to see the difference?
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: fpc-devel On
> Behalf Of
> >> Ozz Nixon
> >> Sent: Saturday, 1
On 14.04.2018 15:16, Ozz Nixon wrote:
following the grammar, I would suggest “in” when trying to do what you want,
not “is”.
if a in 3..10 then begin
You can overload the IN operator:
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse104.html#x213-23500015.6
According to Jonas, this could make
ay, 14 April 2018 22:43
>> To: FPC developers' list
>> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Dangerous
>> optimization in CASE..OF
>>
>> I understand the thread, however, in one of the ISO standards for
>> Pascal, the keyword is, is defined f
u can do a hard cast of that value to that type.
I fail to see the difference?
> -Original Message-
> From: fpc-devel On Behalf
> Of Ozz Nixon
> Sent: Saturday, 14 April 2018 22:43
> To: FPC developers' list
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Dan
I understand the thread, however, in one of the ISO standards for Pascal, the
keyword is, is defined for type not value. The example I gave is the only way I
can see supporting is on non objects - because we are a typed language. That
was my point, not arguing against, however, sharing a way I c
Eh, Ozz? Did you actually read this thread?
It has nothing to do with the declared type of i. it compares the current value
of i against the range of the specified type and will return true if the
current value falls inside that range.
5 is TSubRange -> true
2000 is TSubRange -> false
Also:
c
