I had exactly the same situation with fpc for fink and solved it exactly as suggested by Daniel Herzog. I would go for Individual bootstrap tar balls for each arch, because this saves a lot of bandwidth. I called the one for macosx/darwin: fpc-1.9.8.darwin.bootstrap.tar.gz. maybe it should be
Even better:
One single archive containing all ppc* starting compilers - this way i
could also package it quite easily for all arches, and it would easy to
script it using ppc${ARCH} everywhere...you see?
I don't see it. Because that package will be huge since you need a ppc for
every cpu-os
I had exactly the same situation with fpc for fink and solved it exactly
as suggested by Daniel Herzog. I would go for Individual bootstrap tar
balls for each arch, because this saves a lot of bandwidth. I called the
one for macosx/darwin: fpc-1.9.8.darwin.bootstrap.tar.gz. maybe it
should be
Does the darwin ppcppc binary actually work on linux-ppc?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 30 mrt 2005, at 19:32, Dr. Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
Does the darwin ppcppc binary actually work on linux-ppc?
No, you need a different ppcppc for that.
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Does the darwin ppcppc binary actually work on linux-ppc?
No. - i just tought ppcppc was linux on ppcwell then, replace it
with the correct one :-)
$ ./ppcppc
bash: ./ppcppc: cannot execute binary file
$ file ppcppc
ppcppc: Mach-O executable ppc
$ file ppc386
ppc386: ELF 32-bit LSB
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 20:52 +0200, Daniel Herzog wrote:
No. - i just tought ppcppc was linux on ppcwell then, replace it
with the correct one :-)
It is also called ppcppc on linux:
$ file /usr/lib/fpc/1.9.4/ppcppc
/usr/lib/fpc/1.9.4/ppcppc: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500,
Of Daniel
Herzog
Sent: 30 March 2005 19:52
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Packaging
Does the darwin ppcppc binary actually work on linux-ppc?
No. - i just tought ppcppc was linux on ppcwell then, replace it
with the correct one :-)
$ ./ppcppc
bash: ./ppcppc
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 20:52 +0200, Daniel Herzog wrote:
No. - i just tought ppcppc was linux on ppcwell then, replace it
with the correct one :-)
It is also called ppcppc on linux:
$ file /usr/lib/fpc/1.9.4/ppcppc
/usr/lib/fpc/1.9.4/ppcppc: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or
I think this should be a nice solution:
bootstrap-arch-os-the version i can bootstrap with this.tar.gz
This results in:
bootstrap-386-linux-1.9.8.tar.gz containing a 1.0.10 version binary, for
example.
Please note i used 386 for arch, not x86, or something. So arch is
always a valid ppc* ending.
I think this should be a nice solution:
bootstrap-arch-os-the version i can bootstrap with this.tar.gz
This results in:
bootstrap-386-linux-1.9.8.tar.gz containing a 1.0.10 version binary, for
example.
Please note i used 386 for arch, not x86, or something. So arch is
always a valid
Hi all,
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
My suggestion would be the same dir as the fpc source tar ball, i.e.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
Hi all,
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
640 K ? Is that a joke ? The compiler sources alone are
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
Hi all,
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
640 K ? Is that a joke ? The compiler sources
On 29 mrt 2005, at 15:52, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
640 K ? Is that a joke ? The compiler sources alone are more
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
Hi all,
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg
Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
This is done via ebuilds.
There is grap this file:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
And compile and install it.
Don't expect this directory to exists very long.
Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
This is done via ebuilds.
There is grap this file:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
And compile and install it.
Don't expect this directory to exists very long. When
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
This is done via ebuilds.
There is grap this file:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
And compile and install it.
To
Thanks. I'll, for now, work around it using the binary.tar.
In practise, the only problem is the bigger download, and getting the
ppc386 out of it...
This was clear from the beginning :)
But thank you for taking the trouble yo elaborate.
We're discussing on the core list how we can
Even better:
One single archive containing all ppc* starting compilers - this way i
could also package it quite easily for all arches, and it would easy to
script it using ppc${ARCH} everywhere...you see?
___
fpc-devel maillist -
A sample configuration, or the great (i really like it) samplecfg tool,
are needed, to avoid possibly broken/outdated/... /etc/fpc.cfg files
please add this somehow too.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
A sample configuration, or the great (i really like it) samplecfg tool,
are needed, to avoid possibly broken/outdated/... /etc/fpc.cfg files
please add this somehow too.
I'm sorry. Forget about it - OPT=-n solves it...
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Hi guys.
It would be nice if you could add a starting compiler to your source
packages, this eases up packaging with gentoo alot. this is especially
important for the 1.9.x series, which is changed. (the stable release
looks kinda freezed until 2.0.0 is released)
Sources shouldn't contain
24 matches
Mail list logo
