I'm probably not the best person to comment here, since I've already
been blasted in the past for telling things like they are, but me
personally, if I wanted to do something major with fpc, I'd not bother
trying to get it integrated to the main branch, I'd spawn my own
project, call it som
On 2010-10-22 02:50, Henry Vermaak wrote:
2010/10/21 Adem:
On 2010-10-22 01:23, Henry Vermaak wrote:
Did you notice the word 'promises'?
Somehow you have to prove these "promises".
And, how exactly do you expect them to be proved? On paper?
Seriously, if this work was done more co-operative
2010/10/21 Adem :
> On 2010-10-22 01:23, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>
> 2010/10/21 Adem :
>
> On 2010-10-21 23:47, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
> This is wrong. If a big change promises significant advantages for FPC
> users, it will be done.
>
> The qualifier 'significant' (above and below) is far too subje
On 2010-10-22 01:23, Henry Vermaak wrote:
2010/10/21 Adem:
On 2010-10-21 23:47, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
This is wrong. If a big change promises significant advantages for FPC
users, it will be done.
The qualifier 'significant' (above and below) is far too subjective
sometimes to even have a hop
2010/10/21 Adem :
> On 2010-10-21 23:47, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
> This is wrong. If a big change promises significant advantages for FPC
> users, it will be done.
>
> The qualifier 'significant' (above and below) is far too subjective
> sometimes to even have a hope of arriving at a common ground
On 2010-10-21 23:47, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
This is wrong. If a big change promises significant advantages for FPC
users, it will be done.
The qualifier 'significant' (above and below) is far too subjective
sometimes to even have a hope of arriving at a common ground.
But, I'll take my chaces
On 2010-10-20 09:31, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-10-20 03:30, Hans-Peter Diettrich het geskryf:
SourceForge has good project management tools, from bug reporting,
mailing lists (though I prefer newsgroups),
I also prefer newsgroups.
I could try to set one up, but INN simply scares me.
E
Am 21.10.2010 22:13, schrieb Adem:
> I don't have the top post (
> http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/FPC-other/2010-October/000468.html )
> in this thread to comment on in a more conversation fashion, as a result
> I reverting to bulleted listing of my views on the subject.
>
> 1) In the fpc-devel
I don't have the top post (
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/FPC-other/2010-October/000468.html )
in this thread to comment on in a more conversation fashion, as a result
I reverting to bulleted listing of my views on the subject.
1) In the fpc-devel I have read quite a few arguments that FPC
