Hi,
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, St?phane Aulery wrote:
> Tonight I tried to register with user "LkpPo" and was always defeated by
> the CAPTCHA. After some times I reloaded the page to try again from the
> beginning. After that, lists.freepascal.org and wiki.freepascal.org are
> down (connection
Hi,
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> > I'm positive that some of you are just clever A.I. bots posing as
> > humans.. that's where your super powers come from. You're not actually
> > humans..
> Hahaha, you got that right! That's my secret! :)
For the record, I met him in person
Hi,
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> Yes, this is one of the horrible things I have beef with. I have several.
> ()
> 2) the fact that the array size is not exactly part of the type. In case
> you're wondering what this means, if you declare:
>
> int a[5];
>
> sizeof(a) gives
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> Pascal and C are actually twin brothers with slightly different
> syntax...
Fortunately, they really aren't. :) And this goes both ways.
> But my biggest hate for C is not C itself but just the one fact that it
> lacks strings.
Strings are a
Hi,
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> If the Free Pascal team is ever serious about migrating to Git, I'll
> happily help out with the migration process.
Well, I think the resistance is too big for the migration. The SVN people
go full berserk bloodbath mode when Git is mentioned,
Hi,
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Back in 2009 (I think it was) when I created Git mirrors of FPC and
> Lazarus, I initially did it with all branches and tags in place. It took
> long, but there was no roadblocks.
I think the claim was, after the svn 2 git conversion, some
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Florian Kl?mpfl wrote:
> > so they just use git-svn.
>
> This is what I do as well for several things, but I still think,
> subversion is the better solution as the canonical FPC repository.
*shrug*
As I said, I'm fine with it anyway, whatever. But I can see the
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Trust is that people are not deliberately doing things. For accidental
> things there are tools (except GIT, apparently)
Err...? :) The only way to can fuck up a remote Git repository is by force
pushing, if you have write access already. But
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Florian Kl?mpfl wrote:
> > For those interested, read the many blobs about how the Linux Kernel
> > development is managed.
>
> FPC is a compiler and not an OS kernel, so would like to see such blog
> posts from big compilers: e.g. gcc, clang
I see your point Florian,
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
> > To get get back on track, I'll restate the question I posed in the last
> > message unambigously:
> >
> > how to avoid that a push of member X doesn't leave a branch in an
> > undesirable state that
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> The problem is that if problems get practical the advocatists suddenly step
> back and aren't really able to do more than regurgitate either the standard
> beginner "wisdoms" or "you shouldn't want this" or "this is the new improved
> ways" or
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Martin Frb wrote:
> Or maybe they haven't forgotten how nice and simple svn is.
Erm, I really don't want to be involved in the usual religious war,
personally I use exclusively Git these days (for personal stuff), but I
don't mind SVN, CVS, or whatever a project uses
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 08/13/2015 11:47 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/15/08/13/1229239
In all fairness, they also optimise it so that they emit fewer checks
(if you check whether X of the correct type in one statement, you may
not have
13 matches
Mail list logo
