On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14/09/2011 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
procedure Run;
var
f: TFoo; // type is class, not interface
o: TObj;
begin
f := TFoo.Create;
This is just wrong.
1 - If i use the class not
On 8-9-2011 9:16, michael.vancanneyt-0is9kj9s...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Am I missing something obvious or does it make sense to expose something
like a SupportedFieldTypes property for datasets?
How does Delphi do this?
It does not.
Besides
On 14 Sep 2011, at 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
BUT, if I create my TFoo without refcount should works, right?
Only in some circumstances. These circumstances depend on when the
compiler allocates temporary interface instances, and when these are
finalized.
... but, does not work. In
Yes, the current FPC has this feature. Maybe the problem with WinCE
with multithreading is this:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18756
and not the use or not of Unaligned keyword.
Added with some outdated documentation on Wiki, this cause a little of
confusion in the mind of who starts
I have a form with some threaded objects that notify another form of events
by calling one of that forms events.
I want to convert to a data module and any interested object to register for
those notifications.
My idea is for each thread to have some kind of list of procedure types and
each
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:28:29 Frank Church wrote:
I have a form with some threaded objects that notify another form of events
by calling one of that forms events.
I want to convert to a data module and any interested object to register
for those notifications.
My idea is for each
On 15 September 2011 15:48, Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:28:29 Frank Church wrote:
I have a form with some threaded objects that notify another form of
events
by calling one of that forms events.
I want to convert to a data module and any
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/09/2011 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
procedure Run;
var
f: TFoo; // type is class, not interface
o: TObj;
begin
f := TFoo.Create;
This is just wrong.
Well, wrong just because the language is
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
On 14 Sep 2011, at 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
BUT, if I create my TFoo without refcount should works, right?
Only in some circumstances. These circumstances depend on when the compiler
allocates temporary
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:53:35 Frank Church wrote:
Are there some examples of that somewhere?
http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/mseclasses.pas?view=markup
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
f := TFoo.Create;
This is just wrong.
Well, wrong just because the language is so but not because is ilogical,
right?
I don't understand why it would be wrong. For me it seams correct and
similar to this example:
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:53:35 Frank Church wrote:
Are there some examples of that somewhere?
or
http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/msegui.pas?view=markup
tmethodlist.
Warning, tmethodlist.remove() must be called before destroying the registered
objects.
On 15 September 2011 16:26, Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:53:35 Frank Church wrote:
Are there some examples of that somewhere?
or
http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/msegui.pas?view=markup
tmethodlist.
Warning,
Hi!
I made some changes for WinCE and want test. How I rebuild only the
RTL on windows?
I'm using WinXP, Lazarus 0.9.30.1 with fpc 2.4.4 + cross-arm
downloaded from daily snapshots.
The best regards,
Fabio
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
f := TFoo.Create;
This is just wrong.
Well, wrong just because the language is so but not because is
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand why it would be wrong. For me it seams correct and
similar to this example:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/How_To_Use_Interfaces_to_write_less_code
I'd like to use the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Yeah, you're right... I didn't see this link. =)
But see it one more time: the R instance of TRealClass is not
released... saw? I didn't test but I think if R was released will
occur an AV.
As I said, if we use
Hi all,
I found the Wiki page about the new for-in loop and found a
misinformation. It stated wrongly that it is not possible to
have multiple enumerators per class. It even gave a proposal
for a new feature that did not add anything new.
I added an example how to add a second enumerator to a
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Hi all,
I found the Wiki page about the new for-in loop and found a
misinformation. It stated wrongly that it is not possible to
have multiple enumerators per class. It even gave a proposal
for a new feature
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:52:30 -0300
Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Hi all,
I found the Wiki page about the new for-in loop and found a
misinformation. It stated wrongly that it is not
20 matches
Mail list logo
