Hello,
Graeme has fixed a number of errors that should hopefully solve the problems
with
codepages; Changes have been tested on windows/linux/bsd but on Windows only
with a system that has an english locale.
These changes have been committed to FPC svn. (rev 33453)
We would appreciate it if
On 8 April 2016 at 22:19, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> Excellent, that did the trick - thanks! I ticked the "all network paths
> (UNCs)" option. I would never have found that option as I don't
> consider my local network as part of "Internet Options'. Oh well, that's
> just me.
No, it's not jus
On 8 April 2016 at 22:12, Michael Thompson wrote:
> As you've worked out, this isn't an issue with the exe, it's the new
> security paradigm. To solve/workaround you need to let your windows know
> the network location is secure. From memory, internet option / security /
> trusted sites / add
On 2016-04-08 15:12, Michael Thompson wrote:
> From memory, internet option / security /
> trusted sites /
Excellent, that did the trick - thanks! I ticked the "all network paths
(UNCs)" option. I would never have found that option as I don't
consider my local network as part of "Internet Options
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 22:02 Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2016-04-08 14:48, Tony Caduto wrote:
> > It only does that if the exe is executed from a location windows deems
> > unsafe.
>
> I just noticed that if I run the executable from a console window (not
> Windows Explorer, Total Commander, Double
On 2016-04-08 14:48, Tony Caduto wrote:
> It only does that if the exe is executed from a location windows deems
> unsafe.
I just noticed that if I run the executable from a console window (not
Windows Explorer, Total Commander, Double Commander etc), then the
prompt does not appear. We got to lo
It only does that if the exe is executed from a location windows deems
unsafe.
Even on Windows 10 my laz exes work fine with no publisher warning but as
soon as you try from a network mapped drive or a UNC location bam you get
the warning.
On Apr 8, 2016 8:39 AM, "OBones" wrote:
> If the exe is u
If the exe is unsigned, then Windows will complain everytime it is run.
If it is signed with a fully resolved certificate (not a self created
one), then it will show the publisher in the dialog and depending on
your security settings will either ask you if you want to be asked the
next time or
> Just a little hint: MSEide has "build modes". IIRC it had it even before
> Lazarus introduced them. Please ask on the MSEide+MSEgui mailinglist if you
> like to know how it works.
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.mseide.user
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
Graeme,
Glad to help, that's always annoyed me as well but have never had time to
fully investigate it, I imagine it's due to a signing issue like you
originally thought.
If you find anything out let us know 😁
On Apr 8, 2016 8:01 AM, "Graeme Geldenhuys"
wrote:
On 2016-04-08 13:51, Tony Caduto wr
On 2016-04-08 13:51, Tony Caduto wrote:
> I only get that if I run the exe from a shared network drive on Windows 7
> and up.
Ha, that was the problem! My Win7 is a VirtualBox VM, and my source code
is on a VirtualBox shared folder (mapped to a drive letter in Windows
7). If I copy that executabl
On 2016-04-08 13:35, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> Do you mean an UAC elevation dialog (with a broad yellow bar at the top),
No, see attached screenshot.
It is weird. Only some applications seem to pop up with this dialog,
others don't.
This specific app doesn't require admin privileges, and doesn't us
I only get that if I run the exe from a shared network drive on Windows 7
and up. Maybe your not enabling the manifest, the laz ide does it
automatically for win32.
On Apr 8, 2016 6:20 AM, "Graeme Geldenhuys"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't visit Windows much, but was doing some testing on a Win7 VM.
>
Am 08.04.2016 13:20 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't visit Windows much, but was doing some testing on a Win7 VM.
> Every time I run my FPC generated executable I get a Security Warning
> dialog pop up and it mentions a "Unknown Publisher", and I hav
On Friday 08 April 2016 13:33:35 Krzysztof wrote:
>
> I'm using MSEide only for design forms. For coding I'm still use
> Lazarus (with paths to MSEgui source) so I still can enjoy with
> Lazarus code completition, build modes etc.
Just a little hint: MSEide has "build modes". IIRC it had it even b
> > Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with
> > LCL projects.
>
> Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in
> compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many
> times before.
Oooops, I did not know that it was possible.
So,
On 2016-04-08 12:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Try
...snip...
Thanks Marco, I'll give those a try.
>> Like I said, I don't know which much, and when I do us Windows, it's
>> normally Win2000 which doesn't have this issue.
Wow, that reads terrible. My brain thought one thing, and my fingers
t
On 2016-04-08 12:34, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with
> LCL projects.
Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in
compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many
times before.
Regards,
- Gr
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> Every time I run my FPC generated executable I get a Security Warning
> dialog pop up and it mentions a "Unknown Publisher", and I have to then
> click the 'Run' button before my application runs.
> Does anybody know what is required to get rid of
> con of mside why I don't use it:
>
> The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
> line as it is usual in almost every other editor.
Huh, what do you mean ?
I do not feel any difference with other editors...
The big plus, IMO, of MSEide is his weight.
: less
2016-04-08 12:27 GMT+02:00 Rainer Stratmann :
> con of mside why I don't use it:
>
> The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
> line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Martin says it is difficult
> to
> integrate which I find hard to understand. That b
Hi,
I don't visit Windows much, but was doing some testing on a Win7 VM.
Every time I run my FPC generated executable I get a Security Warning
dialog pop up and it mentions a "Unknown Publisher", and I have to then
click the 'Run' button before my application runs.
Does anybody know what is requi
con of mside why I don't use it:
The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Martin says it is difficult
to
integrate which I find hard to understand. That behaviour of the cursor
confuses me. The other editors
On 2016-04-08 10:08, Santiago A. wrote:
> Any body has experience in both (or another IDE for FPC) and has his two
> cents?
ps:
It's MSEide - if you are refering to the IDE portion of the project. ;-)
I switch between Lazarus and MSEide very frequently. Overall I prefer
MSEide. Yes it's settings
I'm also learning MSEgui from a few weeks. It was very hard start but
now I love it. First what you need understand is that it is not using
any Qt, Gtk, WinAPI backend as Lazarus so you never get native OS look
but of course you can imitate it with own style. Yes, MSEgui has
styles engine. For exam
I know it is a dangerous question that can easily turn into a holly
war, flame or whatever. But here it is.
I have only used Lazarus or a general editor (usually Jedit, geany).
Time ago I checked a little MSEgui and, well, I didn't go for it.
In MSEgui I found fonts small and interface not very n
On 2016-04-07 17:11, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Right-click in explorer, 'Properties', and then 'details' or so ?
I checked again, and you were on the right track. The easiest way,
without installing another program or running the GNU "file" command, is
just to right click on the file, choose P
On 2016-04-08 09:12, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> It's a naming change: the previous Win64 releases were also
> cross-compilers.
I have the installs (with unintall support) for 2.6.0 & 2.6.2 on my
system, and they are both native Win64 compilers. I believe they are
official installers. The 2.6.4 and
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote on Thu, 07 Apr 2016:
I wanted to upgrade my VM to FPC 3.0.0, but I don't seem to find an
official Win64 release like prior versions. All I can find as a what I
assume is a 32-bit cross-complier to win64:
fpc-3.0.0.i386-win32.cross.x86_64-win64.exe
Why did FPC stop m
29 matches
Mail list logo
