Re: [fpc-pascal] JSON Test Suite

2016-10-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, leledumbo wrote: No problem. What about the false positive I demonstrated ? I guess we'll need to talk (open issue?) to the author for that. I have no idea if it's really should be supported or just a misunderstanding from the author. Nono: the test is correct.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Missing messages

2016-10-31 Thread Ralf Quint
On 10/31/2016 1:12 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote: Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote: Same here... First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup I used NNTP years ago the last time. How does marking read messages

Re: [fpc-pascal] Missing messages

2016-10-31 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
On 31/10/16 20:30, Florian Klämpfl wrote: Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote: Same here... First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup I used NNTP years ago the last time. How does marking read messages work

Re: [fpc-pascal] Missing messages

2016-10-31 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote: >> Same here... > > First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup I used NNTP years ago the last time. How does marking read messages work when reading a group with multiple

Re: [fpc-pascal] JSON Test Suite

2016-10-31 Thread leledumbo
> No problem. What about the false positive I demonstrated ? I guess we'll need to talk (open issue?) to the author for that. I have no idea if it's really should be supported or just a misunderstanding from the author. Anyway, FPC fcl-json is now merged into the repository:

Re: [fpc-pascal] Missing messages

2016-10-31 Thread Sven Barth
Am 30.10.2016 20:14 schrieb "Jonas Maebe" : > > José Mejuto wrote: > > Today I had detected that some emails does not reach me in this mailing > > list, in fact the last ones from "leledumbo" about JSON parsing, but > > Graeme and Michael ones arrive successfully > >

Re: [fpc-pascal] JSON Test Suite

2016-10-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016, leledumbo wrote: In comparison to Go, no it isn't. I guess we have some work to do. I mean, if fcl-json wants to be on top. In comparison with others, we're among the second top lines (good cases mostly correct, bad cases a bit behind). At least fcl-json is way above 3