On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, leledumbo wrote:
No problem. What about the false positive I demonstrated ?
I guess we'll need to talk (open issue?) to the author for that. I have no
idea if it's really should be supported or just a misunderstanding from the
author.
Nono: the test is correct.
On 10/31/2016 1:12 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote:
Same here...
First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup
I used NNTP years ago the last time. How does marking read messages
On 31/10/16 20:30, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote:
Same here...
First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup
I used NNTP years ago the last time. How does marking read messages work
Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote:
>> Same here...
>
> First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup
I used NNTP years ago the last time. How does marking read messages work when
reading a group with
multiple
> No problem. What about the false positive I demonstrated ?
I guess we'll need to talk (open issue?) to the author for that. I have no
idea if it's really should be supported or just a misunderstanding from the
author.
Anyway, FPC fcl-json is now merged into the repository:
Am 30.10.2016 20:14 schrieb "Jonas Maebe" :
>
> José Mejuto wrote:
> > Today I had detected that some emails does not reach me in this mailing
> > list, in fact the last ones from "leledumbo" about JSON parsing, but
> > Graeme and Michael ones arrive successfully
>
>
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016, leledumbo wrote:
In comparison to Go, no it isn't. I guess we have some work to do.
I mean, if fcl-json wants to be on top. In comparison with others, we're
among the second top lines (good cases mostly correct, bad cases a bit
behind). At least fcl-json is way above 3