Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Fr., 23. Dez. 2022, 10:48:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> > schrieb am Fr., 23. Dez. 2022, 08:18:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Fr., 23. Dez. 2022, 08:18:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Andrew Haines via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > Hi what I want to do is similar to this question here:
> >
> https://en.delphipraxis.net/topic/423-rtti-determine-record-helper-type-for-a-base-type/
> >
>
Am 20.11.2022 um 02:02 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Nov 20, 2022, at 4:26 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
wrote:
// this kind of constraint that uses T does not work yet
generic TList> = class
procedure Sort;
end;
Does this mean the generic param “Comparer” has a constraint which
Am 14.11.2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vojtěch Čihák via fpc-pascal:
Hi,
I wrote a generic abstract class - a list based on dynamic array (i.e. array of T;) and this class can be specialized elsewhere with any type (records or classes).
Part of the class is sorting. There are more ways how to deliver
Am 18.11.2022 um 20:44 schrieb Flávio Etrusco via fpc-pascal:
Em seg., 14 de nov. de 2022 15:26, Vojtěch Čihák via fpc-pascal
escreveu:
Hi,
I wrote a generic abstract class - a list based on dynamic array
(i.e. array of T;) and this class can be specialized elsewhere
with a
James Richters via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 9. Nov. 2022, 13:47:
> In other words.. is
>
> A:=(B+C/D)-E^F;
> G:=H*(I+J);
> K:=L+M/N;
> O:= A+G-K;
>
> Less efficient than
> O:= ((B+C/D)-E^F)+ (H*(I+J))-(L+M/N);
>
> Or does it end up being the same when it's done?
>
The compiler will insert temp
Jinyang He via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mo.,
10. Okt. 2022, 11:47:
> We, a team working for Loongson, are ready to submit some patches which
> support a new architecture named LoongArch for FreePascal. [1] is one of
> repositories about LoongArch. LoongArch is a RISC architecture. The work
> of Loon
Christo Crause via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mo., 10. Okt. 2022, 17:20:
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:47 AM Jinyang He via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
>
>> We, a team working for Loongson, are ready to submit some patches which
>> support a new architecture named LoongArch
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Do., 6. Okt. 2022, 13:49:
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 2022, at 12:45 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 05.10.2022 um 14:16 schrieb Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal:
> >> Is it possible to assign a class to a variant? I tried and get a crash.
> If
Am 05.10.2022 um 14:16 schrieb Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal:
Is it possible to assign a class to a variant? I tried and get a crash. If not,
why not? It’s just a pointer so I would expect it to work.
There is no field that would hold a class reference and no type value
that would differentiate
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 28. Sep. 2022, 16:17:
> Ok I narrowed down this bug I get with 3.2.2 to TJSONParser.
>
> I’m so confused as to what changed. FormatJSON prints the JSON as
> expected but AsString crashes and gives the error I was seeing from the RPC
> which it trapped
Dennis Lee Bieber via fpc-pascal schrieb
am Fr., 23. Sep. 2022, 04:10:
>If FP is attempting to translate \ into some escape code, you
> might try doubling the backslashes... C:\\Program Files\\My Program\\...
> (I'm presuming "Progam" is a typo.
>
FPC has no need for that as "\" isn't us
Hairy Pixels schrieb am So., 18. Sep. 2022, 02:50:
>
>
> > On Sep 17, 2022, at 10:57 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > === code begin ===
> >
> > type
> > TProc = reference to procedure;
> > TMyClass = class
> > procedure DoThis;
Am 18.09.2022 um 15:39 schrieb Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal:
On Sep 18, 2022, at 7:37 PM, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal
wrote:
This is in general the case that $mode overrides all previously set switches
i.e. it simply sets the switches as defined by the given mode so I am not sure
if this
Am 16.09.2022 um 03:53 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Sep 11, 2022, at 3:28 PM, Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-pascal
wrote:
You should be able to get the Invoke procedure pointer from the RTTI.
Sorry Sven mentioned this I must have glossed over it. So yes I am storing the
function reference in a class
Am 17.09.2022 um 17:04 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Sep 17, 2022, at 9:43 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Then you didn't read my announcement mail deeply enough, cause it's mentioned
there!
Yes I just read that over and I remember it now. I feel like this not the same
behavior in other
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Sa., 17. Sep. 2022, 16:38:
>
>
> > On Sep 17, 2022, at 7:40 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > It seems you haven't read the part about capturing variables in my
> announcement mail, cause you have two problems:
> > First the spec
Am 17.09.2022 um 07:02 schrieb Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal:
Can anyone explain why this program doesn’t capture the state of the local
variable “I” and execute in order? It will return something like this:
Invoked: 3 id: 0001029D41C0
Invoked: 0 id: 0001029D42C0
Invoked: 0 id: 000102
Am 15.09.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Sep 15, 2022, at 12:28 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
As mentioned elsewhere function references are in fact interfaces. And you
can't retrieve a method pointer to a interface function, cause relying on that
would result in either memory lea
Am 08.09.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal:
A function reference can call a class method but can you get the TMethod data
from function references? It was possible with “is object” to cast to TMethod
but that doesn’t seem to be possible with references.
=
type
TMyCl
Am 10.09.2022 um 01:41 schrieb James Richters:
I thought I would make my own IncArray() function:
Procedure IncArray(Var TheArray);
Begin
SetLength(TheArray,Length(TheArray)+1);
End;
But I get a 'Type Mismatch' Any ideas how this could be done? Is this even
possible without specifying the
Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 11. Sep. 2022, 15:29:
> Am 11.09.2022 um 14:22 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
>
> Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-pascal schrieb
> am So., 11. Sep. 2022, 12:18:
>
>> Shouldn't this assignment be forbidden?
>>
>>
Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 11. Sep. 2022, 12:18:
> Am 11.09.2022 um 11:26 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
>
> Hairy Pixels schrieb am Sa., 10. Sep. 2022, 03:21:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 9, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Sven Barth
>> wrote:
>
James Richters via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Sa., 10. Sep. 2022, 22:55:
>
> For some reason
> {$Mode FPC}
> {$modeswitch typehelpers}
> Still had Error: Identifier not found "class"
>
Because support for the "class" keyword is only available when the
modeswitch Class is enabled which is the case for
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Sa., 10. Sep. 2022, 03:21:
>
>
> > On Sep 9, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > How about you simply report such corruptions as bugs? I can always close
> them as "not a bug" or duplicate if necessary.
> >
>
>
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 9. Sep. 2022, 18:05:
> This program gives internal compiler error 2019022201 (Free Pascal
> Compiler version 3.3.1 [2022/05/27] for aarch64). Something is wrong with
> the PPU. This is a very basic program using function references so it
> seems unlike
Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 9. Sep. 2022, 15:29:
> I don't know if it is more or less efficient than using a dynamic array
> but I think it's nicer.
>
It internally uses a dynamic array as well, but duplicates the size with
each growth and keeps track of a separate count of elem
James Richters via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 9. Sep. 2022, 14:58:
> I still end up with a lot of
> SetLength(MyArray,Length(MyArray)+1);
> Every time I want to add one more thing to the array.
>
With FPC 3.2.0 and newer you can do "Concat(MyArray, [TheNewElement])" or
(if modeswitch ArrayOperat
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 9. Sep. 2022, 00:52:
> Curious more than anything, if is nested captures state in a record and
> passes it as an hidden self param, why does returning the variable and
> calling from outside the calling stack frame corrupt the data? It seems
> like it t
Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 7. Sep. 2022, 13:01:
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple of TFPGMaps that I populate once and never change.
> Is it safe to read them (i.e. use Find and Data[]) from different threads?
> I'd avoid using a critical section if not absolutely necessary.
>
I'd s
Peter B via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mi., 7.
Sep. 2022, 13:58:
> I'm wondering if this is related to
> https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/38703
>
> That caused a parameter corruption in a standard function.
> https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2022-March/060361.html
Am 04.09.2022 um 22:05 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Sep 4, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Does this also happen if you don't use a class? Otherwise it might be related
with the other error you already reported. But report this anyway, I'll simply
mark it as duplicate if necess
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 4. Sep. 2022, 18:07:
> The following program uses an anonymous nested function which captures a
> local variable. It seems the arguments get corrupted (likely because of the
> hidden first param for the nested function signature) and prints garbled
> da
Am 29.08.2022 um 01:41 schrieb James Richters via fpc-pascal:
I'm curious if there is a way to search the FPC version history of changes for
BoolToStr to see why it was changed, and see if there is a valid reason not to
change it back. it was obviously changed from the way the documentations is
Anthony Walter schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug. 2022, 22:45:
> I'd be all for just eliminating the "class", "record", and "type" helper
> and adding support for just using "helper" in all modes.
>
"type helper" already allows you to use any supported type. There won't be
any further changes regarding
Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Sa., 27. Aug. 2022, 15:07:
> Ah, it seems the problem is even in {$mode delphi} you must use
> {$modeswitch typehelpers} to define a type helper for an interface.
>
Delphi doesn't support interface helpers, so I don't know whether they'd
use "class helper
Am 27.07.2022 um 15:14 schrieb Ched via fpc-pascal:
Hello All,
I have a long code which include lines for writing stuffs into an
assigned writable text-file F.
WRITELN(F: 'Hello');
WRITELN(F, 'Hello');
The code can be compiled with 3.2.2 in i386/windows and i386/linux and
runs both t
Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Sa., 25. Juni 2022, 15:07:
> Sorry, one additional thought - it's better to choose a directory
> without spaces when installing the LLVM package (i.e. not to accept the
> default proposal "C:\Program Files\..."), or at least let the installer
> change the PAT
Wolfgang Hubert via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Sa., 25. Juni 2022, 11:03:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Tomas Hajny wrote:
> > if you already have your FPC 3.2.2 installation, plus installation of an
> > external package (LLVM). All of it rather feasible. Yes, you may
> possibly
> > encounter some issues with the c
Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 24. Juni 2022, 15:33:
> Thank you very much, declaring the operator within the record does indeed
> solve the issue.
>
> Just to be sure in case I might need it some day: Does this mean, if I
> need e.g. a comparison operator for a specialized TPair, I w
Travis Siegel via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Do., 23. Juni 2022, 20:08:
> There actually is a 64-bit version of xp, but it's not compatible with
> very much. Apparently, it didn't have an emulator in it, so running
> 32-bit software wasn't something it did by default. I never did figure
> out if it
Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Do., 23. Juni 2022, 19:45:
> When compiling, I get this error:
>
> pathfinding.pas(17,17) Error: Operator is not overloaded: "TTileSegment" =
> "TTileSegment"
>
> Which I don't understand -- because the "=" operator is defined in
> tesstypes.pas.
>
> Am I doi
Tomas Hajny schrieb am Mi., 22. Juni 2022, 10:57:
> On 2022-06-21 20:01, Sven Barth wrote:
> > Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal schrieb
> > am Di., 21. Juni 2022, 18:08:
>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> .
> .
> >> I just tried to follow the advice above. Compiling the
Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 21. Juni 2022, 18:08:
> On 2022-06-21 00:14, Pierre Muller via fpc-pascal wrote:
> > Le 20/06/2022 à 23:53, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal a écrit :
> >> Am 20.06.2022 um 12:34 schrieb Wolfgang Hubert via fpc-pascal:
>
>
This is just a test of the mailing list.
@Ryan: if you can see this, would you please reply with only the list, but
not myself as receiver?
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/ma
Am 20.06.2022 um 12:34 schrieb Wolfgang Hubert via fpc-pascal:
Hi,
I have developed a DLL for x64 Windows and compiled with fpc 3.2.2. I
would like to compile the same code for ARM64 running Windows. I need
this to support the MS Surface devices.
Even though the platform list of the Laza
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2022, 15:12:
>
>
> > On Jun 20, 2022, at 7:12 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > Please report a bug.
> >
>
> Done. https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39794. I may
> actually try to fix this m
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2022, 15:41:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> > Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni
> 2022,
> > 08:04:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Sven B
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2022, 15:30:
>
>
> > On Jun 20, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > If the compiler can proove that the function reference never leaves the
> scope (that means no assignment to global variables, out/var parameters,
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2022, 15:32:
> Can anyone explain why this works? TProc is a normal function pointer so
> how did it capture gVar? My understanding is that only nested proc vars
> could do this.
>
Globals don't need to be captured, because they're reachable from any scope.
Hairy Pixels schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2022, 03:38:
> NOTE: I’m replying to this and CC’ing Sven so hopefully he can see it.
>
> > On Jun 19, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Hairy Pixels wrote:
> >
> > This code snippet will give a compiler error "Syntax error, ";" expected
> but "(“ found”. It’s an unspecial
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2022,
08:04:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > Am 20.06.2022 um 03:37 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
> >>
> >>> On Jun 19, 2022, at 10:04 PM, Sven Barth
>
> > wrote:
> >&g
Am 20.06.2022 um 03:37 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Jun 19, 2022, at 10:04 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
As you can see the allocation only happens once and not all the time.
What might be worse however is the optimization behavior as in this example the
compiler wouldn't optimize the counter var
Hairy Pixels schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2022, 15:44:
>
>
> > On Jun 19, 2022, at 7:01 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > As I can see neither Anthony's nor Ryan's mail, but I can see them in
> the archive
Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 5. Juni 2022, 21:02:
> On 2022-06-05 18:20, Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > As the "reference to" feature was recently added to fpc trunk, I'd like
> > to ask if internally there are any penalties (performance perhaps) or
> > drawbacks to usin
Steve Litt via fpc-pascal schrieb am Di.,
31. Mai 2022, 04:12:
> Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal said on Tue, 31 May 2022 08:39:20 +0700
> > FPC is very good about keeping
> >new features behind mode switches you can disable all the cruft if you
> >ever want to create plain procedural Pascal like in
Steve Litt via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mo.,
30. Mai 2022, 21:25:
> With the addition of callback functions, and the closures and events
> they bring to the table, you can go procedural, OOP, or to a degree
> functional. I think adding yet more features obfuscates and Perlizes
> Pascal.
>
We are ad
Am 28.05.2022 um 14:04 schrieb Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal:
Hi,
Sort((left, right) begin
if left < right then
result := -1
else if left > right then
result := 1
else
Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal schrieb
am Fr., 27. Mai 2022, 13:31:
>
> On 27-5-2022 00:46, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
> >
> >> As these two features are rather complicated there might still be a
> >> huge bundle of bugs lurking around so I ask you to test them to year
> >> heart's
Am 27.05.2022 um 00:46 schrieb Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal:
On Thu, 26 May 2022 21:47:06 +0200
Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
As these two features are rather complicated there might still be a
huge bundle of bugs lurking around so I ask you to test them to year
heart's conten
Dear Free Pascal Community,
The Free Pascal Developer team is pleased to finally announce the
addition of a long awaited feature, though to be precise it's two
different, but very much related features: Function References and
Anonymous Functions. These two features can be used independantly o
Am 25.04.2022 um 17:30 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal wrote:
I cannot remember why, but a long time ago when learning Delphi 5 or
6, I
have learned not to call the destructor from within any method of the
class, only from outside.
Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal schrieb
am Mo., 25. Apr. 2022, 13:50:
>
> >[...]
> > type
> > generic TArrayHelper = type helper for array of T
> > procedure Add(value: T);
> > end;
> >
> > var
> > a: array of integer;
> > begin
> > a.Add(1); // specialize TArrayHelper since the comp
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mo., 25. Apr. 2022, 10:58:
>
>
> > On Apr 25, 2022, at 2:39 PM, Martin Frb via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it's dealing with SmallInt (or ShortInt). And if the
> programmer does not know that, then it might be an
Am 22.04.2022 um 23:08 schrieb Rainer Stratmann via fpc-pascal:
Am Freitag, 22. April 2022, 19:53:34 CEST schrieben Sie:
Am 22.04.2022 um 15:48 schrieb Rainer Stratmann via fpc-pascal:
Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2022, 19:15:15 CEST schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-
pascal:
We don't de
Am 23.04.2022 um 00:42 schrieb Martin Frb via fpc-pascal:
Possible one more / Though more of an optimization.
If the code has multiple
Add(Int64(0), Int64(0));
then they will all use the same procedure (just break in the debugger
and check the CRC).
But if one specialization is explicit
Am 22.04.2022 um 22:22 schrieb Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:51:56 +0200
Martin Frb via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]
Well, I tested: It uses the type of the first Param. So it calls a
function for both param of type Byte. The cardinal argument is
converted. (potentially tr
Am 22.04.2022 um 20:51 schrieb Martin Frb via fpc-pascal:
I created a little test program (see bottom of mail).
And it gives a strange warning:
Compile Project, Target:
C:\Users\martin\AppData\Local\Temp\project1.exe: Success, Warnings: 1,
Hints: 3
project1.lpr(67,52) Warning: Range check err
Am 22.04.2022 um 15:48 schrieb Rainer Stratmann via fpc-pascal:
Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2022, 19:15:15 CEST schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
This feature is enabled with the modeswitch
ImplicitFunctionSpecialization and is for now not enabled by default as
this has the potential to break
Dear FPC community,
The FPC developers are pleased to announce the implementation of a new
feature: implicit generic function specializations. This feature was
implemented by Ryan Joseph, so thank you very much, Ryan.
This feature allows you to use generic routines (functions, procedures,
me
Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal schrieb
am Di., 5. Apr. 2022, 10:36:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:23:45 +0200 (CEST)
> Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > RTLEventWaitFor uses WaitForSingleObject internally.
> >
> > According to this:
> >
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/wi
Peter via fpc-pascal schrieb am So., 13.
März 2022, 22:58:
> On 13/03/2022 18:19, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal wrote:
> > Thanks for tracking this down! I have cherry picked the commit to fixes.
>
> Great! It was a nasty bug. Good to see it fixed for the next release.
>
Would you please check
Peter via fpc-pascal schrieb am Fr., 11.
März 2022, 13:47:
> I had a look at the assembler generated by 3.3.1
>
> .
>
> # Var uix located in stack [rsp+83240]
> movl%edx,%eax
> movq%rax,83280(%rsp)
> # Var AttackLoc *located in stack [rsp+83280]*
> # [503] var
>
> .
>
>
Peter via fpc-pascal schrieb am Fr., 11.
März 2022, 00:48:
> Pleased to report that with version
> "Free Pascal Compiler version 3.3.1-10685-gf6ac49a139-unpushed-dirty
> [2022/03/08] for x86_64"
>
> it seems fine.
>
So it seems it was fixed in main at least. Now the interesting question is
3.2.3
Peter via fpc-pascal schrieb am Do., 10.
März 2022, 23:39:
> There are four source files, around 250k, to compile this library. I can
> supply them if anyone wants to investigate.
> Is this sufficient for a bug report? Does anyone know of any existing
> bugs like this? Maybe already fixed?
>
Wo
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 16. Feb. 2022, 07:59:
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 2022, at 2:46 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > // nested function/procedure/routine variable
> > type
> >
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 16. Feb. 2022, 03:14:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 11:09 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > For a global function the compiler has to generate a wrapper that gets
> rid of
Am 15.02.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
On Feb 15, 2022, at 8:26 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
wrote:
It's relatively "easy" to implement assigning a nested function to function
references. However assigning a nested function variable to a function re
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 15. Feb. 2022, 15:02:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 8:32 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > A function reference is simply an interface of which the Invoke method
> can
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Di., 15. Feb. 2022, 15:29:
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 15, 2022, at 8:26 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
>
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 15. Feb. 2022, 13:14:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 5:15 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > It contains a capture object that backs the method.
> > If nothing is captured and the right hand side is a direct function or
&
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 15. Feb. 2022, 13:06:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 3:32 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > I requested that this:
> >
> > procedure TMyObject.Demo;
> >
> > Procedure DoSub;
> > begin
> >Writeln
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 15. Feb. 2022, 13:16:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 7:10 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
> >
> > In Delphi it is not. In FPC it should be :-)
>
> Indeed should be but that's what I'm trying to figure out with how this is
> implemented.
>
> Why wouldn't D
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 15. Feb. 2022, 08:34:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 2:09 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > I've answered this question before:
> >
> > The "Reference to procedure" that will be part of anonymous
> fu
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am So., 13. Feb. 2022, 09:47:
>
>
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:14:14 +0100 (CET)
> > Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pasca
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Sa., 12. Feb. 2022, 12:14:
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This can't be right, can it?
> >
> > type
> > TBird = class
> >procedure Fly;
> > end;
> > TEagle = TBird; // alias
> >
> > procedure
Am 25.01.2022 um 18:48 schrieb Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal:
Consider the following code:
***
PROGRAM project1;
{$mode objfpc}
{$longstrings on} // see output below
{$modeswitch advancedrecords}
USES Variants, Generics.Collections, SysUtils;
TYPE TRecord = PACKED RECORD
FID: NativeUInt;
F
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 26. Jan. 2022, 03:18:
> I have this macro:
>
> {$define TCallback := TCallback2}
>
> which gives a long list of these errors.
>
> warning: Expanding of macros exceeds a depth of 16.
>
> What does this warning mean and how can I resolve it?
>
I did not l
Bart via fpc-pascal schrieb am So., 23.
Jan. 2022, 21:43:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 6:12 PM Rainer Stratmann via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> > // making only one procedure bugtest public in the interface section
> > // makes all other bugtest procedures public as well!
> > // Lazarus 2.0.0+dfsg-2
>
Am 19.01.2022 um 02:48 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
On Jan 18, 2022, at 5:28 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
The values will have the same differences between each other upon each start so
ideally this would work anyway, but if one also throws dynamic packages into
the mix things would get
Am 17.01.2022 um 13:58 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
On Jan 17, 2022, at 5:09 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The VMT writer already does that, cause the VMT pointer is required for each
constructor call.
The pointer to the VMT table is just PVmt(self) right? If I make a program and
do
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mo., 17. Jan. 2022, 08:53:
>
>
> > On Jan 17, 2022, at 1:55 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > Question then is how you get the VMT address as a constant at compile
> time.
> >
> > I'll need to get back to you w
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mo., 17. Jan. 2022, 02:38:
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 2022, at 11:15 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > The class type already is a unique "ID" for each class type when doing
> an equal comparison. You can essentially take
Am 16.01.2022 um 15:25 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
On Jan 16, 2022, at 9:01 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
case PtrUInt(o.ClassType) of
4500656856: writeln('TObject');
end;
I may have spoken too soon and without thinking the through clearly (it's
getting late here!). For this to wor
Am 12.01.2022 um 14:37 schrieb Volo Zyko via fpc-pascal:
Hello,
Some time ago it was announced an experimental support for Windows on Aarch64
(namely in this post
https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2020-April/057762.html). I
tried to build a dll with a proprietary code for that
Bart via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mi., 12.
Jan. 2022, 22:31:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:13 PM Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> > From the definition you can see it is a compilerproc function, meaning
> that the
> > compiler writes direct calls to this.
> > To change the signature of
DougC schrieb am Mi., 12. Jan. 2022, 17:57:
> So, are you saying the one cannot declare an IntToStr function with the
> string represented by a PChar argument? Seems pretty straightforward to me.
>
> Isn't that what is being requested?
>
No, it's not. He's requesting to change the functions that
DougC via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mi., 12.
Jan. 2022, 15:20:
> Alexey-
>
> You can always create such a function yourself, gain experience using it,
> and share the source with us. That way others can gain experience with it
> and maybe someday also ask for it to be added to the standard library.
Am 29.12.2021 um 12:22 schrieb wkitty42--- via fpc-pascal:
On 12/29/21 4:54 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
Translated to RPC: if you want speed, don't use HTTP or JSON. WST
offers a
binary protocol and plain TCP channel, it's bound to be much faster.
i'm sorry... what is WST? g
Rainer Stratmann via fpc-pascal schrieb
am Fr., 24. Dez. 2021, 15:04:
> Is it possible to make a direct 64 bit Linux syscall from a 32 bit fpc
> programm?
>
No, because your program is running as a 32-bit process and thus only has
access to the 32-bit space of syscalls.
Why, what do you want to
101 - 200 of 2815 matches
Mail list logo
