On implementing a linked list I hit to some unexpected (doesn't
mean incorrect though) behaviour.
ptest = ^test;
test = record
p:
pointer;
end;
new(mytest);
When I allocate mytest the pointer
variable p is initialized as $ instead of nil as I did
suspect. In my code though I
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
On implementing a linked list I hit to some unexpected (doesn't mean incorrect
though) behaviour.
ptest = ^test;
test = record
p: pointer;
end;
new(mytest);
When I allocate mytest the pointer variable p is
How do I make FPC not rebuild the unit object file when
contributing units to the compiled unit have been modified?
What is the best strategy - if at all?
If the contributing unit is a stand-alone unit which doesn't depend on other
units (fe. a database connector), you can copy the source
On 16 dec '11, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
On implementing a linked list I
hit to some unexpected (doesn't mean incorrect though) behaviour. ptest
= ^test; test = record p: pointer; end; new(mytest); When I allocate
mytest the
Hello listers,
Navigating in FPC source codes, I found fpcunit. It's really
wonderful. With the tTestCase class, we can generate a report with
the success or the failure of our tests.
However, only observing the source code, it's not easy to comprehend
how it works. I found a single parcial
2011/12/16 luciano de souza luchya...@gmail.com:
Hello listers,
Navigating in FPC source codes, I found fpcunit. It's really
wonderful. With the tTestCase class, we can generate a report with
the success or the failure of our tests.
Is there documentation on the usage of fpcunit? What is
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2011/12/16 luciano de souza luchya...@gmail.com:
Hello listers,
Navigating in FPC source codes, I found fpcunit. It's really
wonderful. With the tTestCase class, we can generate a report with
the success or the failure of our tests.
Is there
Hello,
I just committed a JSON dataset in fcl-db.
This is a dataset which stores its data in JSON objects (as in fpjson) in memory.
The records are in a JSON array, each record can be a JSON object or array.
(not mixed)
The dataset is read-write. It can be used to create JSON data from
From: Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
To: FPC mailing list fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org; Lazarus mailing list
laza...@lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:37 PM
Subject: [fpc-pascal] JSON Dataset in FCL-DB.
Hello,
I just committed a JSON dataset in fcl-db.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
From: Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
To: FPC mailing list fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org; Lazarus mailing list laza...@lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:37 PM
Subject: [fpc-pascal] JSON Dataset in FCL-DB.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Cc: Lazarus mailing list laza...@lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] JSON Dataset in FCL-DB.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
What is missing currently is the delta to update data on the server, but that
should be easily added.
Michael.
Thanks.
Btw. I've found this dependency related error when I tried to compile.
Fixed in revision 19858.
I have the following:
unit foo;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
uses
foobar;
function BitCnt(ABitmap: TBitBoard): Integer;
implementation
{$ifdef cpu386}
function BitCnt(ABitmap: TBitBoard): Integer; assembler; register; nostackframe;
asm
...
end;
{$else}
function BitCnt(ABitmap:
On 16 Dec 2011, at 21:36, Bernd wrote:
This seems to compile and work as intended, no matter which of the two
implementations I choose. But I wonder how this can work? I always
thought that what is written in the interface section is
authoritative. How can the compiler properly use this unit
Perhaps becouse I am not an experienced programer, but the code sounds a
little complex. However, the effort will bring large bennefits.
Thank you very much for the article. It will help me a lot.
Em 16/12/2011 11:44, Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Vincent Snijders
The programmer's guide says in chapter 6.3 that when using register
convention then it does not save any registers. A very old version of
this document even said explicitly: The registers are not saved when
calling a function or procedure, this sentence is no longer in the
programmer's guide but
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:46, Bernd wrote:
Is there maybe any other document somewhere that describes what
*exactly* is expected by the compiler to happen with the registers
during a function call or maybe somebody can show me where in the FPC
sources I have to look to see for myself what
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:59, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:46, Bernd wrote:
Is there maybe any other document somewhere that describes what
*exactly* is expected by the compiler to happen with the registers
during a function call or maybe somebody can show me where in the FPC
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
On implementing a linked list I hit to some unexpected (doesn't mean
incorrect though) behaviour.
ptest = ^test;
test = record
p: pointer;
end;
new(mytest);
When I allocate mytest the pointer variable pÂ
19 matches
Mail list logo
