Hi,
[rant]
I'm just sick of the idiocy of Linux/Unix with there case sensitive
file systems! Google'ing a round for the reason for this, it seems
that in the 60's, it was C programmers that decided that searching for
case sensitive files was easier to implement (and marginally faster).
Well, 40+ y
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
[rant]
I'm just sick of the idiocy of Linux/Unix with there case sensitive
file systems!
Well, some men prefer blondes, others prefer brunettes.
[/rant]
Anyway, back to the point I seriously doubt there would be any
problems, but I'l
Am 23.02.2012 17:17, schrieb Everton Vieira:
Is there any plans to implement public procedures/function of a class
that can be used without been necessary to create the class?
Do you know class procedures/functions?
=== example begin ===
type
TTestClass = class
class procedure Foo;
On 23/02/2012 16:17, Everton Vieira wrote:
> Is there any plans to implement public procedures/function of a class
> that can be used without been necessary to create the class?
>
> -- Everton Vieira.
>
does
class procedure foo(bar: TSomething);
not work ?
L.
___
On 23/2/12 4:17, Everton Vieira wrote:
Is there any plans to implement public procedures/function of a class
that can be used without been necessary to create the class?
I presume you know about class methods such as TObject's
class function ClassName : shortstring;
that you can use like this
Everton Vieira hat am 23. Februar 2012 um 17:17
geschrieben:
> public procedures/function of a class that can be used without been
> necessary to create the class?=?71c4af2e-7ede-4749-bc03-e827c6f6ed0d--
>
>
> Maybe you mean "class procedures"?
> That exists since many years.
>
> Mattias
>
>
I think that you just described class methods:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu27.html
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Everton Vieira wrote:
Is there any plans to implement public procedures/function of a class that can
be used without been necessary to create the class?
This exists: class functions.
Given the declaration
TMYClass = Class
Class function doGLobal (Arg : ArgType) :
Exactly that i was meant, thank you people.
2012/2/23 Michael Van Canneyt
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Everton Vieira wrote:
>
> Is there any plans to implement public procedures/function of a class
>> that can be used without been necessary to create the class?
>>
>
>
> This exists: class functi
I was trying to make this construction:
type
TRec = record
Numero: Integer;
Nome: String;
end;
function mTRec(Numero: Integer; Nome: String): TRec;
type
TTest = class
const Nomes: array[0..2] of TRec = (mTRec(1, 'everton'), mTRec(2,
'murilo'), mTRec(3, 'vieira'));
end;
imple
On Fri, February 24, 2012 12:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
.
.
>> Anyway, back to the point I seriously doubt there would be any
>> problems, but I'll ask anyway. Has anybody here used JFS (case
>> insensitive option enabled) with FPC an
On 24 Feb 2012, at 14:28, Everton Vieira wrote:
type
TTest = class
const Nomes: array[0..2] of TRec = (mTRec(1, 'everton'), mTRec(2,
'murilo'), mTRec(3, 'vieira'));
end;
See http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse22.html (the syntax
is the same for typed constants and initialized
2012/2/24 Tomas Hajny :
> One concrete example - if you create a unit and store it in a file with a
> mixed case name, it will be found by the compiler in your case. If you
> share this source with someone else (also using Linux like you), it may
> not be found. This would be an equal problem if do
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:09:09 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [rant]
> I'm just sick of the idiocy of Linux/Unix with there case sensitive
> file systems! Google'ing a round for the reason for this, it seems
> that in the 60's, it was C programmers that decided that searching for
> case
On 24/02/12 11:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
[rant]
I'm just sick of the idiocy of Linux/Unix with there case sensitive
file systems! Google'ing a round for the reason for this, it seems
that in the 60's, it was C programmers that decided that searching for
case sensitive files was easier to
Is contructions like this that aren't available:
type
TRec = record
Numero: Integer;
Nome: String;
end;
implementation
{$R *.lfm}
procedure ShowTRec(rec: TRec);
begin
ShowMessage(rec.Nome);
end;
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
ShowTRec((Numero: 1; Nome: 'P
>> Is there any how to do it?
You can use advanced record syntax and do something like this:
type
TRec = record
Numero: Integer;
Nome: String;
class function Create(ANumero: Integer; const ANome: string):
TRec; static; inline;
end;
...
class function TRec.Create(ANumero: Integer
Doesn't work this code doesn't compile:
type
{ TRec }
TRec = record
Nome: String;
class function Create(aNome: String): TRec; static; inline;
end;
procedure ShowTRec(rec: TRec);
implementation
{$R *.lfm}
procedure ShowTRec(rec: TRec);
begin
ShowMessage(rec.Nome);
end;
{ TRec }
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
[rant]
I'm just sick of the idiocy of Linux/Unix with there case sensitive
file systems! Google'ing a round for the reason for this, it seems
that in the 60's, it was C programmers that decided that searching for
case sensitive files was easier to implement (and marg
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Everton Vieira wrote:
> Doesn't work this code doesn't compile:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that advanced record syntax works in Delphi
mode only. To compile it you must change {$mode objfpc} to {$mode
Delphi}.
See also:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Feature
On 24 Feb 2012, at 17:50, kyan wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that advanced record syntax works in Delphi
mode only. To compile it you must change {$mode objfpc} to {$mode
Delphi}.
Or add {$modeswitch advancedrecords} after {$mode objfpc}
Jonas
Is true, with {$modeswitch advancedrecords} worked. But i dont see much
sense in put a diretive for enable a new feature.
2012/2/24 Jonas Maebe
>
> On 24 Feb 2012, at 17:50, kyan wrote:
>
> Sorry, I forgot to mention that advanced record syntax works in Delphi
> mode only. To compile it you must
static; should be a keyword, doesn't?
2012/2/24 Everton Vieira
> Is true, with {$modeswitch advancedrecords} worked. But i dont see much
> sense in put a diretive for enable a new feature.
>
> 2012/2/24 Jonas Maebe
>
>>
>> On 24 Feb 2012, at 17:50, kyan wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot to mention t
Am 24.02.2012 12:09 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" :
>
> Hi,
>
> [rant]
> I'm just sick of the idiocy of Linux/Unix with there case sensitive
> file systems! Google'ing a round for the reason for this, it seems
> that in the 60's, it was C programmers that decided that searching for
> case sensitive f
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > Anybody know of other Linux file systems that have a case insensitive
> > option? I really thought ext2 had this, but searching now through the
> > man pages, it seems I was mistaken. Anybody know if Btrfs would have
> > such an option?
>
> Did you kno
Hi,
> You can get similar problems when copying code from Windows to OS X,
> because OS X is not only case insensitive, it normalizes UTF
> characters.
Well that's a good thing in the long run, because you can guarantee more
matches if you always normalize.
>
>
> My recommendation: If you have
On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:07, Everton Vieira wrote:
> static; should be a keyword, doesn't?
No, it's not a keyword.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
27 matches
Mail list logo
