Hi,
I've been trying to figure this out all morning, and after 2 hours I
still can't see why fpdoc doesn't work correctly.
I have linked documentation in descendant classes - so as not to
duplicate documentation in the XML description files. I currently use
the IPF linear output writer, and DO
Thank you for your tips and suggestions.
It seems that FPSYSTEM from rtl-Sysutils is the 1:1 replacement for the old
SHELL function but that made no difference to my problem.
I dug out the previsious fpc version 1.9.4 from archive.debian.org which
fortunately could be installed [for how long?]
On 29/02/2012 11:44, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Martin wrote:
Sure one *could* record *all* variables, and the callstack...
But what if
- you add a new variable, what to initialize it with?
- remove the function that called the current code, or even delete
the line where you just paused?
Or
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 01.03.2012 21:42, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 01.03.2012 16:34, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:29 AM,
But if I have many methods with a identifier like Value, I will have
to modify all methods and put something like lValue, Value1, etc.
Trust me, that's MUCH better than letting the compiler compiles wrong code.
i.e. it refers to identifier we don't mean to refer. I've had a lot of this
before
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM, leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote:
But if I have many methods with a identifier like Value, I will have
to modify all methods and put something like lValue, Value1, etc.
Trust me, that's MUCH better than letting the compiler compiles wrong code.
i.e.
Am 02.03.2012 13:23, schrieb Marcos Douglas:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 01.03.2012 21:42, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 01.03.2012 16:34, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Hi,
The TField class have the FValueBuffer: Pointer attribute and have
also SetData(Buffer: Pointer,...) method that all T***Field subclasses
use to set themselves.
The methods AsInteger, AsString, etc use FValueBuffer
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 13:23, schrieb Marcos Douglas:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 01.03.2012 21:42, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Sven
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Hi,
The TField class have the FValueBuffer: Pointer attribute and have
also SetData(Buffer: Pointer,...) method that all T***Field subclasses
use to set themselves.
The methods
Am 02.03.2012 16:48 schrieb Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 13:23, schrieb Marcos Douglas:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 01.03.2012 21:42,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Hi,
The TField class have the FValueBuffer: Pointer attribute and have
also SetData(Buffer: Pointer,...)
On 02.03.2012 20:03, Sven Barth wrote:
One more question: why this feature isn't works when used with arguments?
The arguments could have the same name of a property.
Normally it should work with arguments as well, but there is a bug if
you define a property with an identifier that's used
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 02.03.2012 20:03, Sven Barth wrote:
One more question: why this feature isn't works when used with
arguments?
The arguments could have the same name of a property.
Normally it should work with arguments as
I need implements a similar structure but I need know if
the use of
Variant have very cost.
It has a cost.
The reason for using a buffer in tdataset is that a record's data
normally is located in one continuous buffer, from which a value is
picked from the right spot
15 matches
Mail list logo
