Den 11-06-2013 04:49, m...@rpzdesign.com skrev:
Passing a Pchar gives weird, erratic behavior
Could you maybe describe this weird, erratic behavior?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
In our previous episode, m...@rpzdesign.com said:
Passing a Pchar gives weird, erratic behavior
Please make minimal examples in a few lines, and add them to the bugtracker.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
To Marco and Jeppe:
As for 2 examples:
res := PosEx(mypchar,'NEEDLE',35) ;
res := Copy (mypchar, 10,15) ;
What are the byte boundaries here?
Zero Based from the pointer?
1 Based from the pointer?
As far as behavior, it would throw the program in unstable land over
time and gdb
would show
In our previous episode, m...@rpzdesign.com said:
As for 2 examples:
res := PosEx(mypchar,'NEEDLE',35) ;
res := Copy (mypchar, 10,15) ;
These are not examples. These are snippets. Examples I can compile and
debug.
What are the byte boundaries here?
Zero Based from the pointer?
I
Oops, those parameters for Posex were backwards:
res := PosEx('NEEDLE',mypchar,35) ;
On 6/11/2013 7:10 AM, m...@rpzdesign.com wrote:
To Marco and Jeppe:
As for 2 examples:
res := PosEx(mypchar,'NEEDLE',35) ;
res := Copy (mypchar, 10,15) ;
What are the byte boundaries here?
Zero Based from
Jonas,
Thanks for the guidance.
Where is cpumips defined?
Also, I could not use the $fpctarget variable, I had to use the exact
file path to avoid some complains in lazarus.
#include /etc/fpc.cfg
#ifdef cpumips
-Fu/home/dennis/fpc/$fpcversion/units/$fpctarget
Hi Folks.
I don't know how Jeppe is playing around but because I want to make
sure FPC works preoperly I decided to take some time to see what
happens
Yhis is the code snippet I use in Win32 and Linux x86_64
All are Lazaur 1.0.8
Put the code under a
Hi,
I thought that if I had a subclass that inherited form a parentclass,
and both have a method with the same name (Bar), then the method of
the subclass hid the method of the parentclass, and you could not call
inherited Bar in the subclass.
More specifically I was under the impression that
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:29 PM, m...@rpzdesign.com m...@rpzdesign.com wrote:
I totally understand, but I did not discover the problem until
I was well into a larger project that I could not de-construct
to try to generate a reproducible sample.
I am under a time pressure, decided to start
