Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> are there any known problems with gprof?
No, but on the other hand it's not something that many people use. We
have one simple test for it in the test suite, but it's only run for
go32v2,linux,freebsd,darwin,haiku.
> Mantis says no but when enabling gprof support in my
Lars wrote:
> Am I just reinventing the library already available for fpc for IPC
> (interprocess communication) ?
The simpleipc unit does not contain support for sending arbitrarily
typed data, but you could use the fcl-json units to encode your data in
json, send the json data as a string, and
Thank you all for the help!
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:51 AM Jonas Maebe
wrote:
> Luiz Gonzaga de Oliveira Neto wrote:
> > Would be it be better to try to compile this with the Turbo Pascal
> > compiler then? Or do you think it would be easier to try to remove the
> >
On 2016-10-18 14:30, fredvs wrote:
> Many thanks Graeme for your opened mind and your impressing clarity.
Tell that to my wife she would disagree! ;-)
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Maybe if you supply two small binaries
Maybe or, better, supply two clean new glasses to those two "developers".
Sorry Graeme but I am tired to fight.
The honor of fpc is saved, the problem is or *ld* or FreeBSD multi-arch
design.
Many thanks Graeme for your opened mind and your impressing
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Bart wrote:
> As explained there is no certain way.
> Lazarus comes with lconvencoding unit which has a guessencoding function.
> Maybe this can be of some help to you?
I'd not seen this unit before. Maybe this is the short way to do what
I
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> There are some heuristics you could try to apply (see e.g.
> http://chsdet.sourceforge.net ), but in general it is impossible to know
> for sure what encoding has been used
Interesting project, I'll take a look,
On 2016-10-18 00:22, David Emerson wrote:
> I filed a bug against the documentation and it was marked fixed in
> 3.1.1, what's the best way to review the new version?
You'll have to have a copy of FPC's 3.1.1 source code. You will also
have to check out the latest documentation from the
On 2016-10-18 03:24, fredvs wrote:
> Yes, without Smart-linking, a 32 bit fpc application runs fine in a
> multi-arch 64 bit system.
>
> With Smart-linking a 32 bit application runs fine only in a mono-arch 32
> bit.
Umm, that is very weird.
Maybe if you supply two small binaries, each with