On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal wrote:
Still, it is more logical to place it under utils, with the rest of the
programs.
The argument about the time to compile seems simply false to me:
If you consider the FPC toplevel 'make all' as the only command to
issue, then you
Am 14.03.2024 um 11:04 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 2024-03-14 11:06, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote:
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:04 schreef Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
To me it therefore seems a better idea to move the IDE to utils, and to
have a
toplevel make command
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:52 schreef Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal:
"OK, that would be addressed in case of inclusion under utils as well.
Even more so, actually - users who want to recompile packages for
whatever reason (e.g. to have debug information included as discussed
here recently ;-) )
On 2024-03-14 11:06, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote:
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:04 schreef Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
To me it therefore seems a better idea to move the IDE to utils, and
to have a
toplevel make command that does the same as 'make all' simply without
the
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:04 schreef Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
To me it therefore seems a better idea to move the IDE to utils, and
to have a
toplevel make command that does the same as 'make all' simply without the
utilities. Or have a 'NOUTILS=1' define.
Or let fpmake simply build
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
I agree, I'm also not very fond of the IDE being in
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
> I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
> "utils" directory with programs.
I agree, I'm also not very fond of the IDE being in packages, but most of
the team considers it a legacy piece of
On 2024-03-14 09:34, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
Thanks, Karoly and Marco.
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
Well, yes, it's somewhat confusing admittedly. The IDE sources used to
be located at the
Op 14-3-2024 om 09:34 schreef Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal:
Thanks, Karoly and Marco.
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
Roughly the RTL is a base set of units needed for the compiler itself.
When the compiler
Thanks, Karoly and Marco.
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
Thankyou again,
Guillermo Martínez.
El Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:45:19 +0100
Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
escribió:
> Op 13-3-2024 om 21:34 schreef Karoly Balogh via
11 matches
Mail list logo
