Hi, Laurie.
since we're the ones who will be converting the old docs/maintaining etc.
It sounds like you have existing content in FrameMaker format, which is not a
deal breaker but it does take time to put such content into InDesign files.
If you want to talk your client out of using
Baruch,
You said:
I'm investigating the feasibility of using voice to
text software as a hedge against tendonitis and other
work-related maladies. Does anyone have experience
using such software with Frame?
I know a couple of people who've done permanent damage to their arms. It's
tragic
Baruch,
You said:
> I'm investigating the feasibility of using voice to
> text software as a hedge against tendonitis and other
> work-related maladies. Does anyone have experience
> using such software with Frame?
I know a couple of people who've done permanent damage to their arms. It's
Hi, Sue.
My FrameMaker training included Adobe's Classroom in a Book (
http://tinyurl.com/b3moea ), and FrameMaker's Help system. The Classroom in a
Book series is excellent because it's a tutorial that forces you to bump into
functionality that you might not otherwise be aware of. It comes
Hi, Sue.
My FrameMaker training included Adobe's Classroom in a Book (
http://tinyurl.com/b3moea ), and FrameMaker's Help system. The Classroom in a
Book series is excellent because it's a tutorial that forces you to bump into
functionality that you might not otherwise be aware of. It comes
Callie,
As a FrameMaker user, I evaluated Flare, FrameMaker +ePublisher, and Adobe's
Technical Communicator Suite last April. Each approach has its limitations,
advantages, and frustrations.
Flare is the most forward-looking product, but there is a learning curve and no
real point in
Callie,
As a FrameMaker user, I evaluated Flare, FrameMaker +ePublisher, and Adobe's
Technical Communicator Suite last April. Each approach has its limitations,
advantages, and frustrations.
Flare is the most forward-looking product, but there is a learning curve and no
real point in
