Re: Footnote Structured Frame Bug

2006-04-02 Thread Daniel Emory
--- Lynne A. Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Lynne for confirming that this bug has been propagated through all releases of structured FrameMaker. == 1) You comment that it doesn't matter whether the text range is defined as an inclusion or

Footnote Structured Frame Bug

2006-04-02 Thread Daniel Emory
--- "Lynne A. Price" wrote: Thank you Lynne for confirming that this bug has been propagated through all releases of structured FrameMaker. == > 1) You comment that it doesn't matter whether the > text range is defined as > an inclusion or contextual element.

Footnote Structured Frame Bug

2006-04-01 Thread Lynne A. Price
At 07:21 AM 3/31/2006, Daniel Emory wrote: >This bug is in FM+SGML 6, and I'm curious whether it's >also in later releases. > >...The bug is unaffected by whether >the Footnote element is included in the structure rule >of those text containers, or is listed as an inclusion >under those text

Footnote Structured Frame Bug

2006-03-31 Thread Daniel Emory
This bug is in FM+SGML 6, and I'm curious whether it's also in later releases. I have an EDD in which an element of type Footnote (not surprisingly, the element name is also Footnote) is provided for most elements that have in their structure rule. The bug is unaffected by whether the Footnote