For the record...
A comparison of random text sizes in PDF as created from FrameMaker 7.2 and
Word 2002 on the same system (XP) shows the same or slightly smaller
rounding deviations when using Word (eg: 10.02 in Word->PDF, vs. 9.96 in
FM->PDF, when 10 points are specified in the source file).
From: Reng, Winfried [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Line width in inported graphics slightly diminishing in
FM generated PDFs
To: framers@FrameUsers.com
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi,
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature
9:06 +0100
From: "Reng, Winfried" <wr...@tycoint.com>
Subject: AW: Line width in inported graphics slightly diminishing in
FM generated PDFs
To:
Message-ID:
<1F5BCB07D8AED54190885844E0EC675D4ED24E at TFSDEMS30002.tycoce.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
On 8 Mar 2006, at 00:52, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat preflight says the
At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat preflight says the
At 2:54 PM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
Thank you for the tip, Peter.
We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I believe that the file format of later releases of Illustrator is
PDF. If you're saving your AI
@FrameUsers.com
Subject: Re: Line width in inported graphics slightly
diminishing in FM generated PDFs
At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner
than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts
Hi,
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat preflight says the graphics uses "0.199600pt" lines.
PDFs of these
Thank you for the tip, Peter.
We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I'm still curious why this happens, but for the practical matter at hand,
we decided to use 0.21 pts for minimum line width in our graphics.
Yosuke
On 8 Mar 2006, at 00:52, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
> We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
> 0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
> but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
> FM, Acrobat preflight says
At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
>0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
>but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
>FM, Acrobat preflight says the
Hi,
> >We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines
> thinner than
> >0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
> >but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs
> created from
> >FM, Acrobat preflight says the graphics uses "0.199600pt"
To: framers at FrameUsers.com
> Subject: Re: Line width in inported graphics slightly
> diminishing in FM generated PDFs
>
> At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>
> >We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner
than
> >0.2 pts. The thinnest
Hi, Yosuke:
At 9:52 AM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
Hi,
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat
Thank you for the tip, Peter.
We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I'm still curious why this happens, but for the practical matter at hand,
we decided to use 0.21 pts for minimum line width in our graphics.
Yosuke
Hi, Yosuke:
At 9:52 AM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
>0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
>but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
>FM, Acrobat
16 matches
Mail list logo
