Thank you! That makes perfect sense. Not.
Sometimes I wonder how much Adobe cares about FrameMaker. Are they as
sloppy with the rest of their products?
Jenny
On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:19 PM, Shlomo Perets wrote:
> Jenny,
>
> You wrote:
>
>> Can someone decode the Adobe update numbers for me? I wa
lto:framers-
> boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Fred Ridder
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:19 AM
> To: l...@astoria-pacific.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Adobe update number vs patch number
>
>
> One distinction is that Adobe generally does n
numbers do not work well in filenames.
-Fred Ridder
> From: l...@astoria-pacific.com
> To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Adobe update number vs patch number
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:51:33 -0800
>
> That's good to know, Shlomo. Thank you. As a person involved i
> To: Jenny Greenleaf
> Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: Adobe update number vs patch number
>
>
>
> 9.0.0 = 9.0p196
> 9.0.1 = 9.0p230
> 9.0.2 = 9.0p237
> 9.0.3 = 9.0p250
>
>
> Shlomo Perets
_
Lea
Jenny,
You wrote:
>Can someone decode the Adobe update numbers for me? I wanted to make
>sure I had the latest updates for my Framemaker 9 installation.
>
>Autoupdate doesn't show any necessary updates, but others have
>reported that it doesn't always.
>
>The support site has 9.01, 9.02, 9.03.
>
