I was hoping to avoid this solution, but if ya gotta, ya gotta. And guess
what - there is a gotcha.
One of the columns is narrow, so the 2 word text wraps around. When these 2
words are the autonumber value, they do not wrap around. They are squeezed
onto one line and the second work overlays
A \t adds a tab stop which isn't going to do anything unless you also
set up a tab stop in the para tag.
See if it'll take a \r to force a return after the first word. That
should work, but it doesn't take on my system.
However, em spaces do work. Try putting a \sm or two between your
words to
Yup, that's a problem. Especially if you believe the doc, which says
it is valid.
Damn tech writers ;- )
Art
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Fred Ridder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replying to Leah Smaller, Art Campbell wrote (in part):
See if it'll take a \r to force a return after the
I was hoping to avoid this solution, but if ya gotta, ya gotta. And guess
what - there is a gotcha.
One of the columns is narrow, so the 2 word text wraps around. When these 2
words are the autonumber value, they do not wrap around. They are squeezed
onto one line and the second work overlays
A \t adds a tab stop which isn't going to do anything unless you also
set up a tab stop in the para tag.
See if it'll take a \r to force a return after the first word. That
should work, but it doesn't take on my system.
However, em spaces do work. Try putting a \sm or two between your
words to
Replying to Leah Smaller, Art Campbell wrote (in part):
> See if it'll take a \r to force a return after the first word. That
> should work, but it doesn't take on my system.
\r is not valid in autonumber strings. I would be nice if it were...
-FR
Yup, that's a problem. Especially if you believe the doc, which says
it is valid.
Damn tech writers ;- )
Art
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Fred Ridder wrote:
> Replying to Leah Smaller, Art Campbell wrote (in part):
>
>> See if it'll take a \r to force a return after the first word. That
