Re: Round-trip revisions via MS Word. Alternate methods?

2014-02-25 Thread John Sgammato
How do you go from FM to Word?
I find the Mif2Go RTF output is very good, especially if you set up your FM
template to minimize disruptions. Layout effects like sideheads and uneven
columns can get messy, but single columns with headers work out really
well, and x-ref links are preserved.


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Harding, Dan dhard...@illinois.edu wrote:

 Good morning,

 We have used the same authoring process for eons: Authors/editors work in
 MS Word, as well as preliminary indexing work. I then take the MS Word
 file, import into FM (unstructured) and do the final print-ready
 formatting, making things adhere to our publishing standards and tightening
 up consistency.

 As a process it work well... until it's time to revise the book for the
 next edition.

 Our authors and editors will ONLY work in MS Word. PDF comments/revisions
 will not work, as there frequently are extensive revisions including
 insertion of new sections (multiple pages) of content, as well as shuffling
 of content.

 When I export the final FM version back to MS Word for them to work on,
 the conversion is VERY crude and frequently requires extensive work on the
 post-conversion Word files for the editors to be able to work within the
 files.

 Then of course there's the reformatting from scratch in FM when the
 revisions are done (which actually is faster and more reliable than trying
 to reconcile changes in the MS Word version with the existing FM version).

 Is there a better way to perform the round-trip process given the MS Word
 requirement, and barring that, are there better ways/tools to get cleaner
 MS Word files from FM than exporting to RTF?

 Would making the change from unstructured to structured FM on my part help
 in this regard?

 Environment:

 Windows 7 64-bit Enterprise
 Framemaker 10 (unstructured) [NOTE: TCS 5 is on order but I have not
 received it yet.]
 Microsoft Office 2010

 Thank you in advance.

 Dan Harding
 University of Illinois Tax School

 ___


 You are currently subscribed to framers as john.sgamm...@actifio.com.

 Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

 To unsubscribe send a blank email to
 framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
 or visit
 http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/john.sgammato%40actifio.com

 Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
 http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.




-- 

http://www.actifio.com/*John Sgammato, Documentation Architect*
*e* john.sgamm...@actifio.com  *c* 508.927.2083
*t* @actifiodocs http://twitter.com/actifiodocs

333 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451
http://twitter.com/actifio
http://www.linkedin.com/company/399246
https://plus.google.com/102870897962348937868/posts
  http://www.youtube.com/user/actifiohttp://www.actifio.com/

*Radically simple copy data management *

*.*
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: Compatibility of old(ish) Software with Windows 7

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Lauriston
I typically have 10-15 applications running and if I come close to
using 4GB it's a sign that one of my apps (usually Firefox) has a
memory leak. As I noted earlier, I ran 64-bit Windows at work for a
year and a half and performance was indistinguishable from my 32-bit
system at home, and at work I preferred the 32-bit version of
Photoshop since the 64-bit version took so long to load.

If people experience performance bottlenecks on a PC with 4GB of RAM
and 32-bit Windows when not performing resource-intensive tasks such
as editing video, it's due to unnecessary bloatware, cycle-hogging
utilities such as Bitdefender, software with memory leaks, or malware.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Harding, Dan dhard...@illinois.edu wrote:
 I think buying more than 4GB of RAM would be a waste of money for most tech 
 writers.

 I disagree 100%. It's not just the specific application(s) you run, but also 
 how you work, that determines how much RAM is useful.

 If you only ever run a single word-processing application, then yes, more 
 would be a waste. However, if you are a rampant multitasker, as I am, where 
 you have a desktop pub application, word processing, Excel, a half dozen 
 browser windows, etc., running simultaneously, system RAM is essential for 
 responsiveness and to avoid virtual memory swapping.
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: Round-trip revisions via MS Word. Alternate methods?

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Lauriston
You might evaluate migrating to Flare, its Word export and import are
significantly better than FrameMaker's, and its FrameMaker import is
very good.

MadCap now claims that Flare supports round-tripping for use as an
add-on for FrameMaker. I don't know if that's an exaggeration or if it
still requires some manual cleanup in FM after import as it did in
7.1:

http://forums.madcapsoftware.com/viewtopic.php?f=10t=13473

In my last job I was unable to get RoboHelp's Word export to do what I
needed it to do, but if you've ordered TCS5 anyway, you might as well
give it a shot. But that won't improve import.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Harding, Dan dhard...@illinois.edu wrote:
 Good morning,

 We have used the same authoring process for eons: Authors/editors work in MS 
 Word, as well as preliminary indexing work. I then take the MS Word file, 
 import into FM (unstructured) and do the final print-ready formatting, making 
 things adhere to our publishing standards and tightening up consistency.

 As a process it work well... until it's time to revise the book for the next 
 edition.

 Our authors and editors will ONLY work in MS Word. PDF comments/revisions 
 will not work, as there frequently are extensive revisions including 
 insertion of new sections (multiple pages) of content, as well as shuffling 
 of content.

 When I export the final FM version back to MS Word for them to work on, the 
 conversion is VERY crude and frequently requires extensive work on the 
 post-conversion Word files for the editors to be able to work within the 
 files.

 Then of course there's the reformatting from scratch in FM when the revisions 
 are done (which actually is faster and more reliable than trying to reconcile 
 changes in the MS Word version with the existing FM version).

 Is there a better way to perform the round-trip process given the MS Word 
 requirement, and barring that, are there better ways/tools to get cleaner MS 
 Word files from FM than exporting to RTF?
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Compatibility of old(ish) Software with Windows 7

2014-02-25 Thread Davis, David
The thing is, Robert, 
FM7 and Acrobat 7 have problems with more than just Windows 7, 
and if someone's earning their living using them, my advice to them would be to 
update their tools to something more recent, rather than compromise their 
operating system!
Even on a basic level, if you only have FM7, you are not going to be able to 
open any FrameMaker docs you get sent from people with FM7.1, 7.2, 8, 9, 10, 11 
or 12! 
And you don't have Unicode support (that was FM 7.2, I think?).

David


Message: 7
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:42:45 -0800
From: Robert Lauriston rob...@lauriston.com
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Compatibility of old(ish) Software with Windows 7
Message-ID:
CAN3Yy4B9EKvjEdPtSQ+tJU6+jJ+6Y8P7meZ8DG=-a2txnmq...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The subject of this thread is Compatibility of old(ish) Software with Windows 
7 and the opening post specifically mentioned FM7 and Acrobat 7, which do have 
problems with 64-bit Windows.

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
 most people do not use old programs that don't work in 64-bit installations 
 of Windows 7.

*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person. This email comes from a division of the Invensys 
Group, owned by Invensys plc, which is a company registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at 3rd Floor, 40 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 
7AW (Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities within 
the Invensys Group, please select the Legal Entities link at invensys.com. 
Invensys PLC is owned by the Schneider-Electric Group.
You may contact Invensys plc on +44 (0)20 3155 1200 or e-mail 
recept...@invensys.com. This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be subject 
to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and 
affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).


___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: Round-trip revisions via MS Word. Alternate methods?

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Lauriston
Second on MIF2Go. It can be a challenge to configure the first time
but the output is far superior to FM's native export and you have a
lot more control. Here are the settings from a mif2htm.ini file that
worked for me:

[Options]
Output=Standard
EqVertAdjust=18

[Setup]
UseExistingMIF=No
DeleteMIF=Yes
ConversionDesigner=No
WordSuffix=.rtf
ApplyTemplateFile=No
ConvertVariables=Yes
GenerateBook=No
UseFrameTOC=No
UseFrameIX=No
UseFrameGenFiles=No
WriteEquations=Yes
WriteAllGraphics=No
WriteRefPageGraphics=Yes
WriteMasterPageGraphics=Yes
UseGraphicFileID=Yes
GraphicNameDigits=6
GraphicExportDPI=96
EquationExportDPI=120
EquationFrameExpand=125
GraphicExportFormat=WMF
PrjFileName=
IDFileName=
PluginVersion=b112
UseExistingDCL=No

[Automation]
WrapAndShip=No
WrapPath=.\wrap
ShipPath=.\wrap

[Fonts]
Times=Times New Roman
Helvetica=Arial
Courier=Courier New
HelveticaNarrow=Arial Narrow
Helvetica-Narrow=Arial Narrow
Century Schoolbook=NewCenturySchlbk
Common Bullets=CommonBullets

[Defaults]

[Graphics]
UseGraphicPreviews=No
GrVertAdjust=8

[GraphFiles]

[GraphExport]
ImportGraphics=Normal
ExportNameChars=4
ExportNumDigits=4

[WordOptions]
Word8=Yes
WordPerfect=No
HeadFoot=None
HFFramed=No
Sideheads=Left
ExtXrefPages=No
Quotes=Help

[WordSectionFiles]

[WordCntStyles]
paragraph=1

[MacroVariables]
; Put any macro definition sections before this section.

[Setup]
PluginVersion=b111l
WriteEquations=Yes
WriteAllGraphics=No
WordSuffix=.rtf
IDFileName=
UseExistingMIF=No
DeleteMIF=Yes
UseExistingDCL=No
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: Round-trip revisions via MS Word. Alternate methods?

2014-02-25 Thread gr...@hedgewizard.net
If you are using FM's native RTF, it's always been a bit dodgy.
(Though the PDF-to-Word exporter is even more so!)

I would *highly* recommend that you invest in a copy of MIF2Go
(http://mif2go.com/).  It provides a MUCH better output.

Grant

 On February 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM Harding, Dan dhard...@illinois.edu wrote:


 Good morning,

 We have used the same authoring process for eons: Authors/editors work in MS
 Word, as well as preliminary indexing work. I then take the MS Word file,
 import into FM (unstructured) and do the final print-ready formatting, making
 things adhere to our publishing standards and tightening up consistency.

 As a process it work well... until it's time to revise the book for the next
 edition.

 Our authors and editors will ONLY work in MS Word. PDF comments/revisions will
 not work, as there frequently are extensive revisions including insertion of
 new sections (multiple pages) of content, as well as shuffling of content.

 When I export the final FM version back to MS Word for them to work on, the
 conversion is VERY crude and frequently requires extensive work on the
 post-conversion Word files for the editors to be able to work within the
 files.

 Then of course there's the reformatting from scratch in FM when the revisions
 are done (which actually is faster and more reliable than trying to reconcile
 changes in the MS Word version with the existing FM version).

 Is there a better way to perform the round-trip process given the MS Word
 requirement, and barring that, are there better ways/tools to get cleaner MS
 Word files from FM than exporting to RTF?

 Would making the change from unstructured to structured FM on my part help in
 this regard?

 Environment:

 Windows 7 64-bit Enterprise
 Framemaker 10 (unstructured) [NOTE: TCS 5 is on order but I have not received
 it yet.]
 Microsoft Office 2010

 Thank you in advance.

 Dan Harding
 University of Illinois Tax School

 ___


 You are currently subscribed to framers as gr...@hedgewizard.net.

 Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

 To unsubscribe send a blank email to
 framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
 or visit
 http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/grant%40hedgewizard.net

 Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
 http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Round-trip revisions via MS Word. Alternate methods?

2014-02-25 Thread Keith Soltys
I saw the PDF with  comments import feature being demoed at an STC meeting 
earlier this month and it did appear to work, at least in the simple case being 
shown. But the document was changed after the PDF was created and the comments 
ended up exactly where they should have been.

It's something I'd like to implement here but I have to wait until we get our 
Acrobat readers upgraded to a more current version.

Regards
Keith

-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com 
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Steve Rickaby
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:12 PM
To: Rick Quatro; 'Harding, Dan'; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Round-trip revisions via MS Word. Alternate methods?

At 09:40 -0500 22/2/14, Rick Quatro wrote:

Mif2Go by Omsys is a much better way to get good Word output from
FrameMaker. They will tell you that there is no good tool for
round-tripping between Word and FrameMaker, but if you are doing it
anyway, you might as well make the Frame to Word side as good as
possible. I highly recommend Mif2Go.

Just to add to what Rick's said, there's a helpful section (6.1) in the Mif2Go 
manual, which you can download from the Omni Systems site, explaining just why 
Word doesn't play well with FrameMaker.

http://mif2go.com/download/ug

Just a thought, taking a more global view... FrameMaker 12 claims to be able to 
import PDFs with comments into the original FrameMaker source document, *even 
if it has changed*. I have no experience of how well it works (yet ;-), but you 
might want to review this new feature.

--
Steve

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail, including all materials contained in or 
attached to this e-mail, contains proprietary and confidential information 
solely for the internal use of the intended recipient. If you have received 
this email in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise 
and ensure that it is permanently deleted from your systems, and do not print, 
copy, distribute or read its contents.

AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ Le présent courriel, y compris tous les documents qu'il 
contient ou qui y sont joints, renferme des renseignements exclusifs et 
confidentiels destinés uniquement à l'usage interne du destinataire prévu. Si 
vous avez reçu le présent courriel par erreur, veuillez nous aviser 
immédiatement, notamment par retour de courriel, et vous assurer qu'il est 
supprimé de façon permanente de vos systèmes; veuillez également vous abstenir 
d'imprimer, de copier, de distribuer ou de lire son contenu.
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: Frame not working this morning

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Lauriston
Have you rebooted your computer?
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: SOLVED was RE: Frame not working this morning

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Lauriston
My guess is an update was applied and the machine needed another
reboot to complete it.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Gutierrez, Anita
anita.gutier...@sage.com wrote:


 Thanks David, Rick, and Robert--I should have tried these basic
 troubleshooting tricks before bugging the list.  Monday morning. L Rebooting
 the machine did the trick for now.

___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.