This OLE renaming trick also works if the OLE is an embedded Excel file or a
Word file. Just rename it to .xls or .doc.
Seraphim
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jeremy H. Griffith jer...@omsys.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:24:48 -0700, Combs, Richard
richard.co...@polycom.com
wrote:
This OLE renaming trick also works if the OLE is an embedded Excel file or a
Word file. Just rename it to .xls or .doc.
Seraphim
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:24:48 -0700, "Combs, Richard"
>
> wrote:
>
> >Actually, it's much worse than
Well said, Jeremy!
Seraphim
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Jeremy H. Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:46:29 -0700, Dov Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hardly see how your request is related to natural
justice any more or less than a request to also allow
Well said, Jeremy!
Seraphim
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:46:29 -0700, Dov Isaacs wrote:
>
> >I hardly see how your request is related to "natural
> >justice" any more or less than a request to also allow simultaneous
> >activation of
The problem might be when you have *more than one condition* applied to a
particular piece of text. If the system is set to show *any one or more* of
those conditions, the text will be visible.
For example, if you have a piece of text that is intended for ProductA, and
is also intended for
The problem might be when you have *more than one condition* applied to a
particular piece of text. If the system is set to show *any one or more* of
those conditions, the text will be visible.
For example, if you have a piece of text that is intended for ProductA, and
is also intended for
Hi List,
Is anyone out there using Frame 8's Boolean conditional features?
I would like to find out more details about how it works, and the limits of
the functionality.
Thanks,
Seraphim Larsen
--
azseraphim at gmail.com ? http://www.linkedin.com/in/seraphimlarsen ?
http://www.ronpaul2008
I also prefer Fred's method.
But if you still need a keyboard shortcut, it's Ctrl-Shift-V
Seraphim Larsen, Senior Technical Writer
Intel Corporation • DEG/ECG/Ops/TechComm • Chandler, AZ
My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel.
On 1/31/07, Fred Ridder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My
I also prefer Fred's method.
But if you still need a keyboard shortcut, it's Ctrl-Shift-V
Seraphim Larsen, Senior Technical Writer
Intel Corporation ? DEG/ECG/Ops/TechComm ? Chandler, AZ
My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel.
On 1/31/07, Fred Ridder wrote:
> My preferred appro
