Although Adobe's installers do not prevent Reader and Acrobat from
being installed in parallel, I MOST STRONGLY RECOMMEND AGAINST
such installations. Unless you are very technically sophisticated,
you are likely not to get the "desired results" when trying to
maintain such an installation.
Further
Although Adobe's installers do not prevent Reader and Acrobat from
being installed in parallel, I MOST STRONGLY RECOMMEND AGAINST
such installations. Unless you are very technically sophisticated,
you are likely not to get the "desired results" when trying to
maintain such an installation.
Further
> Mike's take is that Acrobat and Reader interact in some way that can
> cause problems. And I disagree...
>
> Reader is a separate product that doesn't conflict or inter-operate
> with Acrobat binaries
Art, I could swear that I've heard Dov say there are possible issues, not
only with multip
Or before you do that, you may want to clarify and question Mike's
opinion on version compatibility, which I think is different than
Adobe's.
Mike's take is that Acrobat and Reader interact in some way that can
cause problems. And I disagree. As far as I know, Adobe has always
recommended that onl
> Mike's take is that Acrobat and Reader interact in some way that can
> cause problems. And I disagree...
>
> Reader is a separate product that doesn't conflict or inter-operate
> with Acrobat binaries
Art, I could swear that I've heard Dov say there are possible issues, not
only with multip
Hi, Austin:
You can enter a formal request at
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
You might want to request that the installer test for and report the
presence of conflicting Acrobat installations.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Austin Meredith
wrote:
> Dov, I'm wonder
Or before you do that, you may want to clarify and question Mike's
opinion on version compatibility, which I think is different than
Adobe's.
Mike's take is that Acrobat and Reader interact in some way that can
cause problems. And I disagree. As far as I know, Adobe has always
recommended that onl
Hi, Austin:
You can enter a formal request at
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
You might want to request that the installer test for and report the
presence of conflicting Acrobat installations.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Austin Meredith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Dov, I'm wondering if you should alert Adobe to revise their
installation instructions for Adobe Acrobat: that they should include
as an initial step in their instructions, the purging of the Adobe
Reader from the user's machine.
Dov, I'm wondering if you should alert Adobe to revise their
installation instructions for Adobe Acrobat: that they should include
as an initial step in their instructions, the purging of the Adobe
Reader from the user's machine.
___
You are curren
> The unexplained crashes we get are of two sorts. One sort of crash is
> the one we get in Acrobat Pro 8, during the process of distillation,
> and then when we repeat our procedure, the distillation succeeds
> without any further problem. The other sort of crash is the one we
> get in the Adobe R
> The unexplained crashes we get are of two sorts. One sort of crash is
> the one we get in Acrobat Pro 8, during the process of distillation,
> and then when we repeat our procedure, the distillation succeeds
> without any further problem. The other sort of crash is the one we
> get in the Adobe R
The problems we are having with Acrobat Pro 8 are problems of 1.) the
very significant processing effort that is required, to re-distill an
updated FM8 file into an updated PDF suitable for posting to the
internet, and 2.) the frequency with which Acrobat Pro 8 suddenly
crashes. This processing
Austin Meredith wrote:
> Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
> FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
> Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
Upgrading to a new version of a tool just because it exists has never ma
Acrobat 9 was just announced and has NOT been released. The projected
release date is sometime shortly before July.
For the record, in terms of interoperability with FrameMaker, Acrobat 9
provides no new Distiller features, but should be fully compatible with
all versions of FrameMaker that were c
Acrobat 9 was just announced and has NOT been released. The projected
release date is sometime shortly before July.
For the record, in terms of interoperability with FrameMaker, Acrobat 9
provides no new Distiller features, but should be fully compatible with
all versions of FrameMaker that were c
> Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
> FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
> Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
I'll get it when Creative Suite 4 comes out. There's no sense buying Acrobat
twice.
Mike Wickham
The problems we are having with Acrobat Pro 8 are problems of 1.) the
very significant processing effort that is required, to re-distill an
updated FM8 file into an updated PDF suitable for posting to the
internet, and 2.) the frequency with which Acrobat Pro 8 suddenly
crashes. This processing
Austin Meredith wrote:
> Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
> FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
> Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
Do you have a problem with Acrobat 8 that version 9 fixes? Do you have
an u
> Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
> FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
> Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
I'll get it when Creative Suite 4 comes out. There's no sense buying Acrobat
twice.
Mike Wickham
Austin Meredith wrote:
> Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
> FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
> Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
Do you have a problem with Acrobat 8 that version 9 fixes? Do you have
an
Austin Meredith wrote:
> Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
> FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
> Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
Upgrading to a new version of a tool just because it exists has never
Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
Acrobat Pro 9 is just being released. Since we presently distill our
FM8 files into PDFs with Acrobat8 -- should we upgrade immediately to
Acrobat9, or should we "wait for the dust to settle"?
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PR
24 matches
Mail list logo
