Hi all
> Content Management and Versioning is a recurring topic on Framers. Does
> anyone have a summary of systems that are compatible with Frame?
>
> Also, instead of using binary files, would it be possible to use MIF or,
> if in a completely structured environment, XML in the CVS to keep t
Hi Neil,
Yes, I am using Tortoise with fm files.
I work with them in the following manner.
Firstly, I need you to know that I work with developers wherein the complete
code is managed by CVS and the code build is ant 1.6.5 based.
Torotoise is used more because it integrates directly into explore
At 09:00 AM 3/15/2006, Combs, Richard wrote:
Martha misspoke -- when you check in, the file isn't _replaced_, the new
version is _added_. Every version you check in is available in the
repository.
Thanks, Richard, for clarifying what I meant.
--
Martha Jane {Kolman | Davidson}
Dances With Word
At 05:31 PM 3/14/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if the product manager has just decided to restore the functionality
that was removed a few days ago, how do you retrieve the version of the FM
file that contains the content you deleted when the function was removed?
So far, that's never happ
Neil Tubb wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone out there has used the open source
> Tortoise CVS with Frame files? I'm looking into it as a way
> to introduce some simple version control for our cust docs
> (just simple check-in, check-out...obviously no merges or
> anything like that). Any inf
> Just wondering if anyone out there has used the open source
> Tortoise CVS with Frame files?
I've been using it for a few years now. It was always good, but the
version that came out maybe a year ago fixed some little problems,
especially with the images in icons, and now it's great.
We're al
Donald.M.Rinderknecht wrote:
Also, instead of using binary files, would it be possible to use MIF or,
if in a completely structured environment, XML in the CVS to keep track
of differences down to the 'element' level?
Have used Tortoise SVN for a couple of years for Frame XML saves:
brillian
I've been using it heavily for about 6 weeks.
I really like it -- much better than SourceSafe!
The best part is that I'm working with writers in Paris and Geneva,
while the subversion record copies are on a server in San Jose, CA, so
we have three copies in case of disaster, and as we work from
Content Management and Versioning is a recurring topic on Framers. Does
anyone have a summary of systems that are compatible with Frame?
Also, instead of using binary files, would it be possible to use MIF or,
if in a completely structured environment, XML in the CVS to keep track
of differenc
that Frame 7.1 is working well
with WebDAV natively...
Cheers,
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martha J Davidson
Sent: Tue 3/14/2006 8:20 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Anyone used Tortoise CVS with Frame Files
I use TortoiseCVS with Fram
Martha:
> I use TortoiseCVS with Frame files. I mark both .fm and .book files
> as binary, so that each time I check in the entire file is replaced,
And if the product manager has just decided to restore the functionality
that was removed a few days ago, how do you retrieve the version of the
On 3/14/06, Neil Tubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone out there has used the open source Tortoise CVS
> with Frame files? I'm looking into it as a way to introduce some simple
> version control for our cust docs (just simple check-in,
> check-out...obviously no merges or anyth
I use TortoiseCVS with Frame files. I mark both .fm and .book files
as binary, so that each time I check in the entire file is replaced, and
I don't use CVS Diff. Otherwise, everything works smoothly.
What specific questions do you have?
martha
At 07:58 AM 3/14/2006, Neil Tubb wrote:
Just wond
13 matches
Mail list logo
