I wonder how many of us might buy a Frame Light for home use, even with
no output capabilities at all. I think remember a WYSINQWYG (...not
quite...) editor for Interleaf, and Flare has an editor for use by
reviewers. Something like that would suit me fine.
In my present job I don't have a
On 22/02/2011 7:19 PM, Mike Wickham wrote:
I think it was a mistake for FrameMaker 10 not to include ePub
output directly from FrameMaker. I can output an ePub straight from
InDesign or straight from Apple Pages, but I need the full TCS3 to
output ePub through RoboHelp.
When I saw the
Adobe wants you to use Acrobat for that (with PDFs). That why they
incorporated comments features in Acrobat and incorporating the
comments into Frame.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
052-763-7133
On 2/22/2011 12:56 PM, Anthony Davey wrote:
]
Sent: 23 February 2011 09:17
To: Anthony Davey
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Frame Light, what's the potential market?
Adobe wants you to use Acrobat for that (with PDFs). That why they incorporated
comments features in Acrobat and incorporating the comments into Frame.
Regards
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Frame Light, what's the potential market?
I think it was a mistake for FrameMaker 10 not to include ePub output
directly from FrameMaker. I can output an ePub straight from InDesign
or straight from Apple Pages, but I need the full TCS3
Hi Ant,
Probably not what you want to hear but...
Frankly, why bother. It is reinventing the wheel that Adobe decided to
let fall some years go with Frame View, et al. InDesign already has a
client application for copy editing, I see no particular reason for
Frame to have another
I admit I'm astonished that any software product manager could ask about the
market for a Light version of their product.
I thought the industry had already proven - time and again - that such things
never thrive.
If they want to expand the market for Frame, why not bring back the Mac/Unix
Totally agreeing with Rick here, and yet curiously, we are both SMEs.
Go figure ;)
Alan
On 23/02/2011, at 10:14 AM, Dr Rick Smith wrote:
I admit I'm astonished that any software product manager could ask
about the market for a Light version of their product.
I thought the industry had
This is something I have been in favor of for at least 10 years. It would be
great to be able to set up read-only templates (both structured and
unstructured) for users, particularly those with fairly simple documents. If
it were inexpensive enough ($99 at the most), it could be used by clients
On the other hand, faced with clients who keep asking me to port their
Frame manuals into Word so they can make text edits, I would welcome a
relatively inexpensive 'Frame Light product. As it presently stands,
clients will not buy Frame, and find PDF markup cumbersome for extensive
edits.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Dr Rick Smith r...@cryptosmith.com wrote:
I admit I'm astonished that any software product manager could ask about the
market for a Light version of their product.
I thought the industry had already proven - time and again - that such things
never thrive.
On 23/02/2011, at 11:00 AM, Milan Davidović wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Dr Rick Smith
r...@cryptosmith.com wrote:
I admit I'm astonished that any software product manager could ask
about the market for a Light version of their product.
I thought the industry had already proven
this email unless absolutely necessary.
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Brad Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:21 PM
To: Anthony Davey
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Frame Light, what's the potential
Lightroom probably is a better fit for the description Photoshop Light than
Elements is...
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:00:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Frame Light, what's the potential market?
From: milan.li...@gmail.com
To: r...@cryptosmith.com
CC: framers@lists.frameusers.com
On Tue, Feb 22
I'd like to see this as well, but also doubt that this would be
something that Adobe will get behind. You'd think that Adobe's
web-editor (Buzzword) would export to FM (or MIF), but no. It exports to
PDF, DOC, DOCX, RTF, ZIP, TXT, ODT, and EPUB (hmm .. need to check that
out). C'mon .. MIF is
I think it was a mistake for FrameMaker 10 not to include ePub output
directly from FrameMaker. I can output an ePub straight from InDesign
or straight from Apple Pages, but I need the full TCS3 to output ePub
through RoboHelp.
When I saw the announcement of RJ Jacquez' webinar on
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:19:35 -0600, Mike Wickham i...@mikewickham.com wrote:
I think it was a mistake for FrameMaker 10 not to include ePub output
directly from FrameMaker. I can output an ePub straight from InDesign
or straight from Apple Pages, but I need the full TCS3 to output ePub
and no gasoline. Just makes no sense
whatsoever.
2011/2/22 Fred Ridder docu...@hotmail.com:
Lightroom probably is a better fit for the description Photoshop Light
than Elements is...
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:00:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Frame Light, what's the potential market?
From: milan.li
18 matches
Mail list logo
